Showing posts with label meltdown. Show all posts
Showing posts with label meltdown. Show all posts

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Michael Moore's new film: 'Capitalism: A Love Story'

By GottaLaff

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEigk7nnKgQd4ygXxwvylISfk95tyOyPZJzP0CiuHZqzOhJDPaFBZiuTI8OccvdSApJM8wbBzUGvUEHxChzDlarrJbtNFC8H7EcdT2X9zUz4JkU14eLgHV6LCbwJ7KzDy-nZSawVy1Mgv5SU/s400/Michael+Moore.jpg
Nothing says romance like Wall Street:
Michael Moore's opting to spoof romantic conventions in titling his upcoming documentary "Capitalism: A Love Story," which addresses the causes of the global economic meltdown.

"It will be the perfect date movie," Moore said in an announcement Wednesday. "It's got it all -- lust, passion, romance and 14,000 jobs being eliminated every day. It's a forbidden love, one that dare not speak its name. Heck, let's just say it: It's capitalism." [...]

The film is described as focusing on "the disastrous impact that corporate dominance and out-of-control profit motives have on the lives of Americans and citizens of the world."

Don'tcha love a good chick flick? beating_heart_2.gif - (3K)

The release date is October 2.

Sunday, July 5, 2009

Video- State of the Union: Did Palin make the right move?



Bill Bennett is the sole holdout on Sar not flaming out, and even Huckabee and Rove think she screwed up.

Former Bush adviser Karl Rove and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee both seemed to be scratching their heads over Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's decision to resign her office in an appearance along with Alaska Lt. Gov Sean Parnell on "Fox News Sunday."

Rove said, "I'm a little perplexed," since "she's not going to be able to escape media attention."

And Huckabee deemed it "a risky strategy," adding that "if she did get out because of a feeling of getting chased, that's not going to stop if she stays in politics."

He also questioned the way the resignation was announced, saying, "You don't call a press conference to create questions, you call one to resolve them."

Saturday, July 4, 2009

Quote of the Day

Snort, someone needs to PhotoShop me a nice Crockett and Tubbs pic with Sar and Todd inserted...

“I think Sarah Palin is on the verge of becoming the Miami Vice of American politics: Something a lot of people once thought was cool and then 20 years later look back, shake their heads and just kind of laugh,”

-Republican media consultant Todd Harris.

Sunday, March 22, 2009

"It's about power. How Wall Street insiders are using the bailout to stage a revolution"

By GottaLaff

http://i.realone.com/assets/rn/img/4/4/7/3/26763744-26763749-slarge.jpg
Illustration by Victor Juhasz
Thanks to our friends at BuzzFlash, we get a link to another brutal gem by Matt Taibbi. Fasten your seatbelts:

It's over — we're officially, royally fucked. no empire can survive being rendered a permanent laughingstock, which is what happened as of a few weeks ago, when the buffoons who have been running things in this country finally went one step too far. It happened when Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner was forced to admit that he was once again going to have to stuff billions of taxpayer dollars into a dying insurance giant called AIG, itself a profound symbol of our national decline — a corporation that got rich insuring the concrete and steel of American industry in the country's heyday, only to destroy itself chasing phantom fortunes at the Wall Street card tables, like a dissolute nobleman gambling away the family estate in the waning days of the British Empire. [...]

[A]ll this happened at the end of eight straight years that America devoted to frantically chasing the shadow of a terrorist threat to no avail, eight years spent stopping every citizen at every airport to search every purse, bag, crotch and briefcase for juice boxes and explosive tubes of toothpaste. Yet in the end, our government had no mechanism for searching the balance sheets of companies that held life-or-death power over our society and was unable to spot holes in the national economy the size of Libya (whose entire GDP last year was smaller than AIG's 2008 losses).

So it's time to admit it: We're fools, protagonists in a kind of gruesome comedy about the marriage of greed and stupidity. And the worst part about it is that we're still in denial — we still think this is some kind of unfortunate accident, not something that was created by the group of psychopaths on Wall Street whom we allowed to gang-rape the American Dream. When Geithner announced the new $30 billion bailout, the party line was that poor AIG was just a victim of a lot of shitty luck — bad year for business, you know, what with the financial crisis and all. Edward Liddy, the company's CEO, actually compared it to catching a cold: "The marketplace is a pretty crummy place to be right now," he said. "When the world catches pneumonia, we get it too." [...]

He conveniently forgot to mention that AIG had spent more than a decade systematically scheming to evade U.S. and international regulators, or that one of the causes of its "pneumonia" was making colossal, world-sinking $500 billion bets with money it didn't have, in a toxic and completely unregulated derivatives market. [...]

People are pissed off about this financial crisis, and about this bailout, but they're not pissed off enough. The reality is that the worldwide economic meltdown and the bailout that followed were together a kind of revolution, a coup d'état. They cemented and formalized a political trend that has been snowballing for decades: the gradual takeover of the government by a small class of connected insiders, who used money to control elections, buy influence and systematically weaken financial regulations.

The crisis was the coup de grâce: Given virtually free rein over the economy, these same insiders first wrecked the financial world, then cunningly granted themselves nearly unlimited emergency powers to clean up their own mess. [...]

The mistake most people make in looking at the financial crisis is thinking of it in terms of money, a habit that might lead you to look at the unfolding mess as a huge bonus-killing downer for the Wall Street class. But if you look at it in purely Machiavellian terms, what you see is a colossal power grab that threatens to turn the federal government into a kind of giant Enron — a huge, impenetrable black box filled with self-dealing insiders whose scheme is the securing of individual profits at the expense of an ocean of unwitting involuntary shareholders, previously known as taxpayers.

Go read the rest here.

Sunday, March 1, 2009

VIDEO: Palin filmmaker John Ziegler's meltdown: "You are a sackless lying piece of crap... you have no balls."

By GottaLaff

Every time this gasbag gets in front of a camera, he spews even more gag-inducing bibble-babble, if that's even possible. Here's a thought: Try helping yourself for a change, John. You might start by staying out of camera range for more than 24 hours, a bad habit you and your pal Limelight Palin share.

Wasn't proving himself to be the worst blind date ever on national television embarrassing enough for him? I guess not, considering the obliviously weak arguments in his own defense.

Speaking of oblivious, this wannabe Spielberg once again shows himself to have zero awareness of how video cameras actually record what you say and do, and how those recordings get recycled on the Internets for all to see.

Look! Here's one of those recordings now!

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

FBI investigating 530 corporate fraud cases

By GottaLaff

The meltdown is in meltdown:

The FBI is conducting more than 500 investigations of corporate fraud amid the financial meltdown, FBI Deputy Director John Pistole told the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday.

Investigators are tackling an even bigger mountain of mortgage fraud cases in which hundreds of millions of dollars may have been swindled from the system, he told lawmakers.

Pistole says there are 530 active corporate fraud investigations, and 38 of them involve some of the biggest names in corporate finance in cases directly related to the current economic crisis. [...]

"It is a matter of lawyers, brokers or real estate professionals that are systematically trying to defraud the system," Pistole said.

Agents have even seen some instances of organized crime getting involved in mortgage fraud, he said. [...]

Senate Democrats are urging more spending to expand the ranks of the FBI's financial fraud investigators. [...]

Barofsky, who was appointed the inspector general of the ongoing financial bailout plan, suggested the best way to clean up mortgage fraud is to pursue licensed professionals in the industry, and make examples of them.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Yikes

By GottaLaff


Um...
On C-Span, Rep. Paul Kanjorski (D-PA) explained how the Federal Reserve told members of Congress about an electronic run on the banks "to the tune of $550 billion dollars" within "an hour or two" last fall.

According to Kanjorski, on September 18, 2008 the Fed tried to "stem the tide" by pumping money into the financial system but it didn't work and decided instead to announce an immediate increase in deposit insurance to $250,000 per account to stop the panic.

Said Kanjorski: "If they had not done that, their estimation is that by 2 p.m. that afternoon, $5.5 trillion would have been drawn out of the money market system of the U.S., would have collapsed the entire economy of the U.S., and within 24 hours the world economy would have collapsed. It would have been the end of our economic system and our political system as we know it."
Gulp.

Sunday, February 1, 2009

AP Investigation: Banks sought 21,800 high-paid foreign workers during meltdown

By GottaLaff

The more we learn, the worse they get:

Major U.S. banks sought government permission to bring thousands of foreign workers into the country for high-paying jobs even as the system was melting down last year and Americans were getting laid off, according to an Associated Press review of visa applications.

The dozen banks now receiving the biggest rescue packages, totaling more than $150 billion, requested visas for more than 21,800 foreign workers over the past six years for positions that included senior vice presidents, corporate lawyers, junior investment analysts and human resources specialists. The average annual salary for those jobs was $90,721, nearly twice the median income for all American households. [...]

It is unclear how many foreign workers the banks actually hired; the government does not release those details. The actual number is likely a fraction of the 21,800 foreign workers the banks sought to hire because the government only grants 85,000 such visas each year among all U.S. employers. [...]

Foreigners are attractive hires because companies have found ways to pay them less than American workers. [...]

David Huber of Chicago is a computer networking engineer who has testified to Congress about losing out on a 2002 job with the former Bank One Corp. He learned later the bank applied to hire dozens of foreign visa holders for work he said he was qualified to do.

"American citizenship is being undermined working in our own country," Huber said in an AP interview. [...]

Grassley, with Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., is pushing for legislation to make employers recruit American workers first, along with other changes to the visa program. [...]

Jennifer Scott of Yreka, Calif., a retired technical systems manager at Bank of America in Concord, Calif., said in 2004 she oversaw foreign employees from a contractor firm that also sent overnight work to employees in India.

"It had nothing to do with a shortage, but they didn't want to pay the U.S. rate," she said, adding that the quality of the work was weak. "It's all about numbers crunching."

Numbers crunching? It's safe to say there very well may be some head-crunching in these banks' future.

Saturday, January 31, 2009

Governments across Europe tremble as angry people take to the streets

By GottaLaff

One of my alumni, Matt, who I have known for 13 years, is an activist. He is also the most intelligent, well-read, and informed former student I've ever had the pleasure to know. He is soft-spoken, but direct, and when Matt tells me something, I listen. He is not one to exaggerate.

He has given me many a heads-up about protests, anarchist demonstrations, impending revolt, you name it. He's witnessed, and video taped, police brutality, the militarization of our cities, and other assaults on our freedoms. When it happens, Matt is there, or knows someone else who is.

Talk about having a finger on the pulse of growing unrest, he's very well-connected and warns me of events months before they happen.

Matt and I met over Christmas break, and he was clearly disquieted by the building anger churning across Europe. His own agitation made me squirm, as he described scenes of violence and impending "revolution". Matt, you called it:

France paralysed by a wave of strike action, the boulevards of Paris resembling a debris-strewn battlefield. The Hungarian currency sinks to its lowest level ever against the euro, as the unemployment figure rises. Greek farmers block the road into Bulgaria in protest at low prices for their produce. New figures from the biggest bank in the Baltic show that the three post-Soviet states there face the biggest recessions in Europe.

It's a snapshot of a single day – yesterday – in a Europe sinking into the bleakest of times. But while the outlook may be dark in the big wealthy democracies of western Europe, it is in the young, poor, vulnerable states of central and eastern Europe that the trauma of crash, slump and meltdown looks graver.

Exactly 20 years ago, in serial revolutionary rejoicing, they ditched communism to put their faith in a capitalism now in crisis and by which they feel betrayed. The result has been the biggest protests across the former communist bloc since the days of people power.

Europe's time of troubles is gathering depth and scale. Governments are trembling. Revolt is in the air.

The article goes on to break it down geographically. I'll let you all know what Matt says the next time I speak to him.

Friday, December 12, 2008

Breaking- White House open to using TARP money for automakers


Just said on MSNBC. Get the hell on it already.

Added-

WASHINGTON - The White House said Friday it is willing to consider using some of the $700 billion Wall Street bailout fund to help the U.S. auto industry.

The news comes the day after a bailout-weary Congress killed a $14 billion package to aid struggling U.S. automakers. A partisan dispute Thursday night over union wage cuts derailed a last-ditch effort to revive the emergency aid before year’s end.

Lansing, Michigan Mayor Lashes Out



Mayor Virg Bernero of Lansing, Mich., tells Harry Smith that Congress' failure to help the Big 3 is "colossal." He called on the president to stop what he believes could be an economic depression.

Monday, September 22, 2008

The Bush economy fix, by Randi Rhodes

By GottaLaff

Randi Rhodes just now, on the rush to fix the economy their way (and yes, she compared it to the rush to invade Iraq, as we did here):

"They raped us and now they want us to pay for the rape kit."
Sounds almost Palinesque, doesn't it?

UPDATE, per Randi:
The plan is a "pre-emptive economic attack on the American people."
She goes on:
Decisions by the Secretary of the Treasury are non-reviewable and may not be reviewed by any court or any administrative agency.

Why? There is no defense for that. Period. One man in charge of our nation's financial destiny on every front, wtf? Any decision he makes, he makes alone and is not reviewable. Double wtf?

How many times are we going to do this? They are putting us out of business, taking money out of consumers' hands and into the hands of the Secretary. Just him alone.
I only just got home, so I'm catching up. I have no idea what the Democrats' response has been today. Anyone?

Sunday, September 21, 2008

Nancy Pelosi not signing on to Paulson's power grab

By GottaLaff

This is a little more like it. Pelosi
:

“Congress will respond to the financial markets crisis by taking action this week in a bipartisan manner that will protect the taxpayers’ interests. The Administration’s $700 billion proposal does not include the necessary safeguards. Democrats believe a responsible solution should include independent oversight, protections for homeowners and constraints on excessive executive compensation.

We will not simply hand over a $700 billion blank check to Wall Street and hope for a better outcome. Democrats will act responsibly to insulate Main Street from Wall Street.

“As we proceed to deal with this crisis, this is clear recognition that the party is over for the Bush Administration’s anything goes, failed economic policies that have damaged our economy, undermined the middle class and further pointed out the need for a New Direction.

H/t: Firedoglake

VIDEO: Gramm-pa McCain can't fire Cox, but he'd replace him anyway

By GottaLaff

Via Think Progress:


Last week, Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) said that if he were president, he would fire SEC chairman Christopher Cox — a plan that is unconstitutional. “By the way, technically he can’t be quote, fired. But I’ll tell you, when I’m president, if I want somebody to resign, they resign.”
The video clip from 60 Minutes shows a few remarks from the conversation that I posted about here. Gramm-pa McCain discusses replacing Cox with New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo:
[I]n a statement from Cuomo’s spokesperson Alex Detrick, the Attorney General was non-commital: “It would inappropriate to comment in light of our ongoing investigations of short selling during the markets turmoil last week, as well as other market investigations we are currently conducting in conjuction with the SEC.
Grammps? If you aren't legally allowed to fire someone, it might be difficult to replace him.

Obama called Pelosi, Reid, others about economy

By GottaLaff

Barack Obama made a phone call or eight:

ABC's Sunlen Miller reports: Since yesterday, Sen. Barack Obama has spoken on the phone with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, Senate Banking Committee chairman Chris Dodd, Rep. Barney Frank, Sen. Chuck Schumer, Rep. Ralph (sic) Emmanuel, former President Bill Clinton and Sen. Hillary Clinton about the economic situation and the plan for dealing with it.

Spokesperson Linda Douglass says that the conversations were about devising a "quick, bipartisan solution" to the economic crisis [...]

"As of now, the Bush administration has only offered a concept with a staggering price tag, not a plan," Obama said. "Even if the U.S. Treasury recovers some or most of its investment over time, this initial outlay of up to $700 billion is sobering. And in return for their support, the American people must be assured that the deal reflects the basic principles of transparency, and fairness, and reform. We can’t allow this to happen again. They have run this government, they have run this economy into the ground. We’ve got to make sure that we lift if back up, but we’ve got to have some rules in place to make sure it doesn’t happen again."

Obama set out seven principles (several of which he has regularly mentioned on the campaign trail) for what he would like to see included in the government's bailout plan.

    • No blank check. If we grant the Treasury broad authority to address the immediate crisis, we must insist on independent accountability and oversight. [...]
    • Rescue requires mutual responsibility. As taxpayers are asked to take extraordinary steps to protect our financial system, it is only appropriate to expect those institutions that benefit to help protect American homeowners and the American economy. [...]
    • Taxpayers should be protected. This should not be a handout to Wall Street. [...]
    • Help homeowners stay in their homes. [...] We cannot have a plan for Wall Street banks that does not help homeowners stay in their homes and help distressed communities.
    • A global response. As I said on Friday, this is a global financial crisis and it requires a global solution. [...]
    • Main Street, not just Wall Street. [...] I call on Senator McCain, President Bush, Republicans and Democrats to join me in supporting an emergency economic plan for working families [...]
    • Build a regulatory structure for the 21st Century. While there is not time in a week to remake our regulatory structure to prevent abuses in the future, we should commit ourselves to the kind of reforms I have been advocating for several years. We need new rules of the road for the 21st Century economy, together with the means and willingness to enforce them.

Saturday, September 20, 2008

BushCo's Fear in a Box! Get some today!

By GottaLaff


First, read my post down thread. Then read the following excerpts by Glenn Greenwald.

His piece is long, but so worth it. He starts with the premise that we've been bamboozled before (Iraq much?) based on the product we all buy into: Fear! Packaged as Iraq, it's got something for everyone! Blood! Guts! Heroism! Action! Impending Doom!

But wait! There's more! Fear and dread now come packaged as The Great Depression II! In this episode we have Wealth! Poverty! Meltdown! Loss! Financial Ruin! And yes, Impending Doom! Hurry up, Congress! Make a decision! The entire country depends on you! Yes folks, it's the Gullibility Hour, brought to you buy BushCo's Fear in a box! Get some today!
The people on whose behalf these schemes are being implemented -- the true beneficiaries -- are the very same people who have been running and owning our Government -- both parties -- for decades, which is why they have been able to do what they've been doing without interference. They were able to gamble without limit because they control the Government, and now they're having others bear the brunt of their collapse for the same reason -- because the Government is largely run for their benefit. [...]

The transactions are way too complex even for the most sophisticated financial analysts to understand, let alone value. Whatever else is true, generations of Americans are almost certainly going to be severely burdened in untold ways by the events of the last week -- ones that have been carried out largely without any debate and mostly in secret. [...]

The Treasury Secretary is dictating to these companies how they should be run and who should run them. The Federal Government now controls what were -- up until last month -- vast private assets. These are extreme -- truly radical -- changes to how our society functions. Does anyone have any disagreement with any of it or is anyone alarmed by what the consequences are -- not the economic consequences but the consequences of so radically changing how things function so fundamentally and so quickly?

Other countries are debating it. The headline in the largest Brazilian newspaper this week was: "Capitalist Socialism??" and articles all week have questioned -- with alarm -- whether what the U.S. Government did has just radically and permanently altered the world economic system and ushered in some perverse form of "socialism" where industries are nationalized and massive debt imposed on workers in order to protect the wealthiest. If Latin America is shocked at the degree of nationalization and government-mandated transfer of wealth, that is a pretty compelling reflection of how extreme -- unprecedented -- it all is.

But there's virtually no discussion of that in America's dominant media outlets. All one hears is that everything that is happening is necessary to save us all from economic doom. And what's most amazing about that is that the Natural, Unchallenged Consensus That Nobody Questions can shift drastically in a matter of days and still nobody questions anything. This is what Atrios observed as I was writing this post:

It's fascinating to watch how easily consensus is manufactured. A few days ago elite opinion seemed to be cheering Paulson's "no bailout" line, and now they're cheering a trillion bucks thrown down the crapper. All the Very Serious People will spend their days coming up with their pony plans, oblivious to the fact that the pony plan is not an option. The Bush administration's plan is the option.
[T]his authorizes Hank Paulson to transfer $700 billion of taxpayer money to private industry in his sole discretion, and nobody has the right or ability to review or challenge any decision he makes.
Fear in a Box! Get yours today!
"When you listened to him describe it you gulped," said Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York. [...]

" [T]he congressional leaders were told "that we’re literally maybe days away from a complete meltdown of our financial system, with all the implications here at home and globally."

Mr. Schumer added, "History was sort of hanging over it, like this was a moment."

Please, go read.

UPDATE: Bernie Sanders has something to say.

H/t: Paddy

Paulson’s Blank Check

By GottaLaff

See if this makes you as jumpy as it made me.

Via Firedoglake:

  • No one who foresaw the crisis, such as Krugman or Stiglitz, is involved in making the plan to fix it.
  • The man overseeing the bailout is the ex-CEO of Goldman Sachs, a Wall Street Company. He helped cause the crisis.
  • Paulson helped obtain the SEC exemption which allowed brokerages to increase leverage to 60:1 from 12:1.
  • The money is Paulson's to use for buying commercial and residential mortgages and mortgaged backed securities as he chooses. No one has any oversight over him, and he can pay any price he wants to, including face amount of the debt.
  • Courts cannot review his decisions, not can any regulators. He has to report to Congress once every six months.
  • He gets 700 Billion dollars to use as he sees fit, looking after the taxpayer is a "consideration" not a requirement.
  • Bet on that 700 Billion dollars being gone before January 20, 2009. Bet on Treasury asking for more.
  • That is $2,324 dollars per man, woman and child in America
  • There is no bailout for mortgage holders. Banks get bailed out, but not ordinary people.
  • Banks and brokerages made record profits these last eight years. Ordinary Americans barely broke even.
  • In 2007 Wall Street paid itself bonuses equal to the raises of 80 million Americans.
  • Banks bailed out by this plan need make no changes in how they do business.
  • Banks bailed out need not replace the management which drove them into insolvency.
  • Shareholders and bondholders of such banks do not lose a cent.
  • The securities which caused this crisis are still allowed.
  • Expect the 700 billion dollars to increase inflation, especially in oil.
  • Bush is asking you to trust his administration with 700 billion after spending 580 billion on the Iraq war. Do you trust him?
The text of the bill is here. As I've said before, I glaze over at this stuff, but from what I've read here, I'm not thrilled. I wasn't to begin with, but this is an easy-to-understand list, and it has increased my not-thrilledness.

H/t: One of our Anonymi

Friday, September 19, 2008

Cook Report:: Gramm-pa McCain made "the biggest faux pas ...all year"

By GottaLaff

Maybe if Gramm-py stopped using that abacus of his for number crunching:

This is not about the economy, this is about a crisis,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), one of McCain’s closest friends, said Friday. “And John McCain has shown a willingness to get his hands dirty to take on corruption. Barack Obama hasn't found any corruption to fight, even in Chicago."
Or maybe he should just get new friends who don't claim "this isn't about the economy."
Observers say McCain has his work cut out for him – and that an already tough year for the GOP likely just got tougher.

The critical event was McCain’s unfortunate comment that the economy is sound,” says Charlie Cook of the nonpartisan Cook Political Report. “He’s been really slow to pick up on what’s been going on. He stumbled knee-deep into a pile, and it’s going to be hard for him to get out. . . . This has been the biggest faux pas committed by either of them all year.”
It's my firm belief that Gramm-pa has been stuck in a pile for years. But I digress...
“The problem that Sen. McCain has got at this moment is that this is a big government intervention in the financial markets, and guess what? : At the moment, it’s working,” says former Nebraska Sen. Bob Kerrey, an Obama supporter. “His fundamental argument all along has been to keep the government out of it. But if the government hadn’t intervened, this thing could easily have spiraled out of control.”
But there's always a but.
That’s the bad news for McCain. The bad news for Obama: The economic crisis could help propel him to the presidency, but if the federal government spends $1 trillion or even $500 billion bailing out financial companies, it won’t have much left over for the plans he hopes to pursue come January.
But...
With the market on a roller-coaster, major financial institutions failing, and the federal government having to step in to prevent a fiscal disaster of Depression-era proportions, such inverted numbers as seen in the Times poll could prove fatal to McCain’s hopes.
But... McCain wants to make this about anything BUT the economy. Wowzers, that was 2 buts in a row:
But the imperative to muddy Obama as part of the problem trumps any concerns about backlash. Anything to make the crisis a Beltway problem instead of just a Bush problem.

And after pinning blame on Obama, McCain’s camp wants to move the debate off the current crisis and force a conversation about larger issues relating to the economy -- and also the two candidates. [...] “A vote for Sen. Obama will leave this country at risk during one of the most severe challenges to America’s economy since the Great Depression, and that’s straight talk, my friends.”
My friends, we have just witnessed the biggest "but" of all.

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Bush II sets example for Palin/McBush III: Ignore the press

By GottaLaff


Froomkin nails it again:

And here is what you might call the "money quote": "[M]y administration is focused on meeting these challenges. The American people can be sure we will continue to act to strengthen and stabilize our financial markets and improve investor confidence. "

Anbody reassured? I didn't think so.

His remarks, made just outside the Oval Office, lasted less than two minutes. Nothing he said changed the growing awareness in Washington that, despite being the nation's first MBA president, Bush has been and remains largely AWOL as the nation's wealth dwindles away.

And of course, he took no questions.

On Tuesday, Bush ignored a shouted question while touring hurricane damage in Galveston. "Mr. President, what are you going to do about AIG?" Tabassum Zakaria of Reuters yelled out. Bush shot back: "We're here talking about the people of Galveston, Texas. They've got a great mayor and they're working hard."

Yesterday, Bush ignored Associated Press reporter Deb Riechmann's request for comment during a photo op with Panama's President Martin Torrijos. The exchange was not reflected in the official transcript of his newsless event. But Cox News Service reporter Ken Herman captured it on video, and provided his own transcription:

"'With all due respect,' [Riechmann] said with all due respect, 'you haven't taken any questions since Aug. 6.'

"'I can't hear what you said,' Bush responded, with all due respect.

"'This way please, through the Rose Garden,' a pool wrangler said, with all due respect.

"'You got to speak with a louder voice,' Bush said, with a smile and all due respect.

"'I can't hear you,' he added. 'I'm old.'"

And Ben Feller writes for the Associated Press this morning: "As he finished his very brief statement and turned to walk back into the Oval Office, a reporter asked if he believed the economy was still sound. The president kept walking."

George W. Bush is a despicable little cretin who has accomplished two things in his unfathomably failed presidency: Deteriorating America to the point of its being nearly unrecognizable, and being the perfect mentor to Gramm-pa Sid and his granddaughter, Rookie McLipstick.

I say this with all due respect.

Financial crisis not that important to BushCo

By GottaLaff

As long as Bush/McCain have what they need, the rest of us can go jump in a lake. Oh wait, there are no lakes. Global warming dried them all up:

House Minority Leader John Boehner said his conference was forced to cancel a meeting Thursday morning after the administration "refused" to send over a representative to brief House Republicans on the federal government's response to the latest financial turmoil.

Boehner did not give a reason for the no-show from the administration, the latest sign of deteriorating relations between congressional Republicans and the White House.

"I and all of my colleagues are concerned about the lack of information and the lack of consultation that has occurred," Boehner said of the admnistration's recent bailouts.

Recent Posts