Showing posts with label flip flop. Show all posts
Showing posts with label flip flop. Show all posts

Sunday, May 2, 2010

VIDEO: Waffle, Baby, Waffle a la Rubio

By GottaLaff

First:

Please note that posting could be light today. Paddy is gone for a few hours, I'm on no sleep and have a huge video project ahead of me that got a bigger response than I ever expected, and that's a good thing. Between editing and Paddy's absence, things will be a little slower today.


With that, join me in watching Marco Rubio partake in the new GOP dance craze that I call the McCain Flip Flop:

The oil rig disaster has caused problems for the Republican candidate Marco Rubio, a drilling proponent. In 2008, Rubio told Newt Gingrich’s big oil front group American Solutions for Winning the Future that he was proud to join the “drill here, drill now, pay less effort.” (Rubio also promoted drilling In a spanish-language endorsement.)

Now, Rubio is waffling on drilling.



If this disaster makes proponents of drilling think twice, then there is a silver lining. The cost was way too steep, but playing the Glad Game can at least help us cope.

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Poll-itics: John McCain Way Ahead of Hayworth

By GottaLaff

Not Maverick takes a big lead in one poll:

A new Rocky Mountain poll in Arizona finds Sen. John McCain (R) is leading his Republican primary opponent, J.D. Hayworth (R), 54% to 26%, with 18% still undecided.

Will the voters flip back to Hayworth? How far to the right will Not Maverick flop to win over the racial profile crowd? Stay tuned for our next episode of As the Stomach Turns....

Monday, April 26, 2010

VIDEO- McCain on AZ racial profiling bill: I Don’t Know ‘Whether All Of It Is Legal Or Not’

By GottaLaff

Remember this?

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) "has endorsed a tough Arizona anti-immigration bill that will let police arrest people who aren't carrying identification, the latest move in McCain's rightward shift in advance of a tough Republican Senate primary this summer," Politico reports.

Not Maverick Any More is supporting a racial profiling bill that he's not even sure is legal (at about :22):



So let's recap: First he's a maverick, then he isn't. Then he shifts on immigration. Now he's not sure he supports "all the details" of the legislation he advocates. He's just for "the thrust" of the bill.

All while not answering a direct question with a direct answer.

Flanked by police officers at a town hall, McCain rejected fears that the bill will lead to racial profiling. [...]

Unlike her father, McCain's daughter, Meghan, has a clear position on the law. In her Daily Beast column, the younger McCain writes, "I do not support the bill that was signed by Governor Jan Brewer. I believe it gives the state police a license to discriminate, and also, in many ways, violates the civil rights of Arizona residents. Simply put, I think it is a bad law that is missing the bigger picture of what is really going on with illegal immigration."

Meghan can teach her father a thing or two about a thing or two. Now there's someone who could probably beat J.D. Hayworth.

By the way, Daddy McCain called the law a “good tool” for law enforcement. He can relate. He's a good tool for right wing extremists.

Tuesday, April 20, 2010

VIDEO- John McCain: Illegal Immigrants "Intentionally Causing Accidents On The Freeway"

By GottaLaff

In a previous post, I wrote about Flippy McCain doing an about-face and suddenly supporting racial profiling in Arizona disguised as an anti-immigration bill.

It gets worse:



Poor Not McMaveri-cain. He's apparently losing what's left of his mind, as you can see by his response to a question about said racial profiling:

McCain: I hope -- I would be very sorry that if some of that happens. And I regret it, but I also regret the -- really, it's not just the murder of Robert Krantz. It's the people whose homes and property are being violated. It's the drive-by that -- the drivers of cars with illegals in it that are intentionally causing accidents on the freeway. Look, our border is not secured. Our citizens are not safe.

Yes, that's right, Flippy, these people want to die, kill others, maim and get maimed. It's all in their big Looking-for-a-Better Life Plan, striving to get into crashes and destroy as many lives as possible in the process.

Let's recap: Causing car accidents and injuring oneself and others is a vast improvement on the status quo and has become a lifelong goal.

Why, I bet the government's in on it, too! After all, he specified that it happens on ::dun-dun-dun-n-n:: freeways! It's a plot. It's all one big, commie, socialist, Marxist plot. The end is near.

"Get me a bottle of milk and some tranquilizers. I see it all now, it's a plot... a plot..."

Monday, April 19, 2010

Flippy McCain now supports Arizona anti-immigration bill

By GottaLaff

Now that he's no longer calls himself "maverick", we can now refer to him as "flippy". It's more appropriate, and it's way cuter:

Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) "has endorsed a tough Arizona anti-immigration bill that will let police arrest people who aren't carrying identification, the latest move in McCain's rightward shift in advance of a tough Republican Senate primary this summer," Politico reports.

"It's a dramatic switch for a senator who supported comprehensive immigration reform with Democratic lion Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA) just four years ago."

Flippy's into racial profiling now, is he? Nice. Way to change for the worse. He's gone so far to the right now, he's running headlong into his old running mate, Halfy.

Flippy/Halfy/Loony* 2012-2013 1/2!

*That would be Michele Bachmann. Flippy will need her when Halfy quits in the middle of the campaign.

Friday, March 5, 2010

Russ Feingold tells White House to try KSM in civilian court

By GottaLaff

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj8HJ4XuJCMLvv-AOM5ZZ1iL-fJ-P2bXzA7Tqlj92EuZra3dQf8nGurjmP4hS_HqjaoLqXyeCfo3AIbpp_JJoJf5CVVThWF-C-9_3uYHmSwyxDGhM5u1Ms8RGirDUjLlfXLTXPmLZ5deEgB/s320/russ+feingold.jpg

Earlier I posted about the change of heart, er, flip flop, by the White House over the venue for the Khalid Sheikh Mohammed trial. I also expressed my frustration, and explained why military commissions are inferior to civilian courts.

Looks like I'm not alone. Greg Sargent spoke to Russ Feingold's office and got the following statement. Feingold is the first prominent Congressional Democrat to speak out, but hopefully not the last:

“We have a great track record of successfully trying and convicting terrorists in civilian courts. The military commission system is largely untested, and these cases could easily get bogged down in years of legal challenges. The best way to bring these terrorists to justice swiftly is through our civilian courts.”


Bingo.


The bottom line, as Robert Gates has suggested, is that those arguing against civilian trials for terror suspects are, intentionally or not, actually trying to limit the tools at our disposal for fighting terrorism — for ideological reasons. That point can’t be restated enough.


Thank you Russ Feingold, and thank you Greg.

White House considers military trial for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed

By GottaLaff

http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2010/POLITICS/03/05/911.trial/story.ksm.fbi.jpg

I'm one of the progressives mentioned in this piece that would not be happy if Obama flips on this one:

White House advisers are considering recommending alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed be tried in a military court instead of a civilian one in New York City, a senior administration official told CNN on Friday.

In November, Attorney General Eric Holder announced his intention to try Mohammed in a New York civilian court. [...]

Progressive activists blasted the potential administration switch.

"If this stunning reversal comes to pass, President Obama will deal a death blow to his own Justice Department, not to mention American values," said Anthony Romero, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union.

"If the president flip-flops and retreats to the Bush military commissions, he will betray his campaign promise to restore the rule of law, demonstrate that his principles are up for grabs and lose all credibility with Americans who care about justice and the rule of law."

Romero is right. Military trials, as I've said a million times, allow hearsay evidence and false testimony given after having been tortured into submission.

And why is there so little confidence in our legal system? We've handled terrorists in criminal court before with success. Why is this time difference? The BushCo politics of fear is making a big comeback.

We are a nation of laws, not a nation of tortured laws. President Obama needs to stick to his word and adhere to American principles.

Thursday, March 4, 2010

Rep. Nathan Deal (R-Ga.) Postpones Resignation to Vote on Health Care

By GottaLaff

Deal or no deal:

Rep. Nathan Deal (R-Ga.) will not be leaving Congress on Monday, as he announced earlier this week, but will instead stay through the upcoming House vote on a health care overhaul. [...]

State party leaders had encouraged him resign his seat so he could dedicate himself full time to the race. But House GOP leaders urged Deal to stick around Washington a little longer after realizing that his departure would lower the threshold for passage of the health care bill from 217 to 216 votes.


As I said in a previous post, they're feeling more threatened than ever, because health care reform is about to become a reality.

Unfortunately, the more threatened they feel, the more desperate they become, and so the more smeary and feary and irrational they get.

The next few weeks should be a barrel of laughs.

Monday, February 22, 2010

Mitch Daniels Open to Presidential Bid

By GottaLaff

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20090530/us-republicans-climate/images/9d927a1c-0d0f-4f89-ba92-f93f12a7d80f.jpg

Too late for the CPAC straw poll, huh?
Late last year, Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels (R) said explicitly he was not interested in running for president in 2012 and dismissed any speculation that he might be a candidate.

"That has now changed, according to the Washington Post.

"During an interview at the winter meeting of the National Governors Association here over the weekend, Daniels said he has now been persuaded to keep open the door to a possible candidacy."
It's always good to start right out with a flip flop. Mitch Daniels (R-Hyp. O. Crite):

He then left Hudson in 1990 for the pharmaceutical company Eli Lilly and Company. From 1993 until 1997, Daniels was President of North American operations, and promoted to Senior Vice President for Corporate Strategy and Policy at Eli Lilly in 1997 where he served until leaving the company in 2001.[7][6]

In January 2001, upon his appointment as Director of federal Office of Management and Budget (see below), Daniels resigned as a member of the board of Indianapolis Power & Light Co. and sold the $1.45 million he held in company stock, donating the proceeds to charity. Later that year, Indianapolis Power & Light Co. was bought by Virginia-based AES Corp.[6] After the stocks dropped, the Indiana Securities Division investigated the sale and found no wrongdoing. A state investigation also found no wrongdoing. [...]

In January 2001, Daniels accepted President George W. Bush's invitation to serve as director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). [...]

Daniels came under fire for overseeing a $236 billion annual surplus turn into a $400 billion deficit during his 29-month tenure. Supporters argued that Daniels was one of the few in the administration working toward restraint, and that ultimately he had to take marching orders from the administration.[7]

In 2002, Daniels helped discredit a report by Assistant to the President on Economic Policy Lawrence B. Lindsey estimating the cost of the Iraq War at between $100–$200 billion. Daniels called this estimate "very, very high" and stated that the costs would be between $50–$60 billion.[10] In March, as Congress considered H.R. 1559, “Emergency Wartime Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2003,” OMB was ordered to prepare an estimate for the defeat of the Iraqi Army and a six-month aftermath ending with the 2003 fiscal year on September 30.[11] Daniels’ estimate referred only to this period,[12].

Much more here.

Oh, and there's this:

Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, in the GOP's weekly radio and Internet address, said the House's climate bill was "a classic example of unwise government." The address culminated a week of coordinated Republican attacks on the Democratic proposal, which would require the first nationwide reductions in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases blamed for global warming.

By all means, Mitch, run.

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

John McCain, then and now, on "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"

By GottaLaff



Unfortunately, Flipper McNotPrez flipped in the wrong direction:

"The day that the leadership of the military comes to me and says, Senator, we ought to change the policy, then I think we ought to consider seriously changing it because those leaders in the military are the ones we give the responsibility to."

-- Sen. John McCain, in an interview on Hardball in 2006, about the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy.

"At this moment of immense hardship for our armed services, we should not be seeking to overturn the Don't Ask, Don't Tell policy."

-- McCain, quoted by NBC News earlier today, after the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs recommended changing the policy.
Today:
"No matter how I look at the issue, I cannot escape being troubled by the fact that we have in place a policy which forces young men and women to lie about who they are in order to defend their fellow citizens."

-- Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, quoted by the New York Times, on the need to repeal the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" law.
So much for responding to the leaders in the military.

By the way, does J Sid get that there are gays in the military now who contribute greatly?

And does he realize how many other countries allow gays in their military and somehow their world hasn't come to an end?

And finally, he of all people should understand that "this moment of immense hardship for our armed services" is exactly the time we need even more skilled service members, not fewer.

I am so unbelievably glad this man is not in the White House.

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

VIDEO- Colbert: Lieberman's got "Joe-Mentia"

By GottaLaff

The Colbert ReportMon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
For He's a Jowly Good Fellow
www.colbertnation.com
Colbert Report Full EpisodesPolitical HumorU.S. Speedskating


Colbert reminds us that Traitor Joe is over 65, so his "Joe-mentia" will be covered by Medicare.


(click on red button)

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Now aides deny Giuliani bid for U.S. Senate

By GottaLaff



He was going to run before he wasn't. Oh well then. And just as the polls indicated that he could beat Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) handily.

After all the talk of entering the race, we get this:
"It's not true," spokeswoman Maria Comella emailed just now.
All together now, a big Scooby Doo "whaaa?"

Sunday, November 15, 2009

VIDEO: Fox's Chris Wallace catches Rudy Giuliani's blunder, but not his own

By GottaLaff

Of all people, Chris Wallace zaps Mr. Noun-Verb-9/11's flip-flopitude. How bracing!

Sidebar: I caught an interesting slip of the tongue by Wallace at about :39, too. Listen carefully:



Apparently, according to Rudy, "we are exactly who we say we are, a nation of war"... Well, according to Rudy and the Bush crime family.

Thursday, September 3, 2009

Dep't. of So What Else is New: Alberto Gonzales flip flops on torture investigation

By GottaLaff

Gonzo, August 31, 2009 (posted here yesterday):

Former U.S. Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales on Tuesday defended the decision of his current successor, Eric H. Holder Jr., to investigate alleged prisoner abuse by CIA interrogators over President Obama's desire to look forward.

"As chief prosecutor of the United States, he should make the decision on his own, based on the facts, then inform the White House," said Mr. Gonzales, who was appointed to the post by President George W. Bush in 2005 and resigned in 2007. [...]

"Anyone who politicizes... the interrogations... should be condemned..." he said, unwittingly condemning himself and his fellow thugs.

The Washington Times America's Morning News (interview with Alberto Gonzales)

Gonzo today:
In a new interview with the Washington Times, he said that just because he thinks it’s “legitimate to question and examine” the interrogators’ conduct, he doesn’t endorse an investigation:

I don’t support the investigation by the department because this is a matter that has already been reviewed thoroughly and because I believe that another investigation is going to harm our intelligence gathering capabilities and that’s a concern that’s shared by career intelligence officials and so for those reasons I respectfully disagree with the decision.

He probably just didn't "recall" his previous-- recorded-- statments.

Sunday, May 17, 2009

Obama puts pragmatism over promises

By GottaLaff


If you didn't already know that President Obama tends to be more of a centrist than a liberal, or if you didn't expect it, then you most likely haven't been paying attention. I'm surprised at the surprise of so many who believed that President Obama was a die-hard lefty. He never presented himself that way, as I've said in previous posts, and he has always maintained that he'd try to meet the other side halfway. That doesn't sound all that ultra-lib to me.

This article in the L.A. Times discusses his "flip flops":
Unlike his predecessor, George W. Bush, who styled himself as "the Decider" and took pride in sticking with decisions come what might, Obama is emerging as a leader so committed to pragmatism that he will move to a new position with barely a shrug.

Whether it's a long-standing campaign promise or a recent Oval Office decision, Obama has shown a willingness to reverse himself and even anger his most liberal supporters if he can advance a higher-priority goal or avoid what he sees as a distracting controversy.
William A. Galston, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and former advisor to President Clinton:
"If he's basically faithful to the agenda he ran on, the reversals -- such as they are -- are going to be seen as tolerable exceptions rather than as leading indicators," he said. "If you are a single-issue person, what the president says in regard to your issue may be a bitter disappointment."
Now about those 180s:
The recent shifts appear to be part of a pattern of starting in a liberal position and then rerouting toward the center.
Surprise! (Only if you hadn't been paying attention for the past two years)
Though for the most part liberals have held their fire, the last week's events raise the question of how long they will tolerate the pattern. [...]

As the House debated war funding last week, House Appropriations Committee Chairman David R. Obey (D-Wis.) compared his position to when, after being elected to the House as an antiwar candidate in 1969, he initially gave President Nixon's war policy the benefit of the doubt.

"I decided to give him a year. I'm pretty much in the same position," Obey said. "We have no choice but to give the president a shot. It's a miserable situation that he's inherited, and he does not have a good hand to play."
For those of us who are disappointed in some of his decisions, keep in mind that the alternative would have been much worse. Obama won the nomination. It was down to him or ::shudder:: McCain/Palin. He is light years better, smarter, wiser, and way leftier than they ever would have been.

When we disagree strongly enough with his positions, then we should make sure we are heard. Call or write your representatives, notify the White House web site, email letters to the editors of your local newspapers. But while whining and stomping our collective feet is a great release, it won't move those proverbial mountains. Only being pro-active will.

And if there is one thing we have learned, it's that President Obama is a very good listener.

Saturday, May 16, 2009

Steele: We Need Guns To Defend Ourselves Against ‘Terrorists’ Coming To ‘Our Communities’

By GottaLaff

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg-GWzV8xnlSu71n6dOIPZZUSeGdXeulFo5rD0E4H9ZdS-TQdAWdfZF7HmI8dHM2RgGNYUGWO87Kcad-o4LefVy4NHoQot_auZcdxc3Q1WHBUqrhDwZRsxapHP7s_hyphenhyphenNK4nZifqMkrvlw/s400/MichaelSteele.jpg
I am an anti-American Marxist, Commie, Socialist, gay abortionist who wants your guns, your religion, your government, your money, your unborn baby, your guns... hell, I want it all:
Today, RNC Chairman Michael Steele spoke at the National Rifle Association’s (NRA) “Celebration of American Values” Leadership Forum. During his speech today, Steele criticized Barack Obama’s potential Supreme Court nominee, saying the President is “looking to put Doctor Phil on the Court.

Steele also played to his NRA audience by fear-mongering that Democrats may take away Americans’ guns. He claimed that those guns are more necessary than ever since Guantanamo detainees may soon be in the United States and the public will have to defend itself:

It is ironic, to say the least, that at the same time Democrats in Congress are threatening to deny Americans their second amendment right to own a firearm and defend their families and homes, they are considering bringing terrorists like 9-11 mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed and other Al Qaeda detainees to our communities once the President follows through on his campaign promise to close Guantanamo Bay.

[...] Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said yesterday on Fox News. “We don’t want them in our jails.” (Of couse, Guantanamo detainees transferred to the U.S. for trials would actually be housed in federal prisons, where dozens of dangerous terrorists are already held. In fact, the U.S. has already successfully prosecuted 145 terrorism cases in federal court, a sharp contrast to the series of debacles in Guantanamo prosecutions.) [...]

Just two years ago, Steele came out forcefully against assault weapons, saying that they were “overkill.” “If you want to talk about gun control, that’s where you need to start,” said Steele. “We’ve got 300 gun laws on the books right now. At the end of the day, it’s about how we enforce the law.” However, a few months ago he changed his mind and said that a ban on assault weapons was just the first step in the Obama administration’s plan “repeal the 2nd Amendment.

Let's put it this way: I want the guns of anyone who sounds as crazy as these wackos do.

Sunday, April 12, 2009

Rick Warren cancels ABC appearance

By GottaLaff

So I'm thumbing through my L.A. Times, and I notice that Rev. Rick Warren would be on George Stephanopoulososlousolsousoluos. "Oh, good!" I exclaimed. "Now Rev. Rick can explain this!" I bounded around the house, rubbing my little liberal fascist, communist, socialist hands together in anticipation. My hopes were so high!

But then....

But then.... this happened:

Pastor Rick Warren, after making apparently contradictory statements about his stance on a gay-marriage measure, canceled an Easter Sunday appearance on ABC’s “This Week” just “moments before the scheduled interview,” host George Stephanopoulos told viewers.

Stephanopoulos said Warren’s representatives said the best-selling evangelical author was “sick with exhaustion.” The host told viewers that he wished the pastor a speedy recovery.
He must be exhausted. He'd just executed one of the most strenuous flip-flops in history. Yes, history, and that's no easy feat. Here's hopes for a speedy recovery and the ability to rebound, both physically and morally.

Thursday, April 9, 2009

McCain Adviser Flips on Bush Tax Cuts

By GottaLaff


Any chance of any McCainians flipping on the Iraq occupation? Never mind. That's asking too much:
Heard in the CQ newsroom:

Though economist Douglas Holtz-Eakin spent the 2008 presidential campaign advising Sen. John McCain to defend the Bush-era tax cuts, he now thinks they should be allowed to expire on Dec. 31, 2010 due to "the prospect of an Argentina-style fiscal meltdown."
Said Holtz-Eakin: "If you ask: 'Who pays the taxes?', it's the first step toward not having the answer be: 'Our kids.'"
Now that's change you can believe in.

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Gramm-pa McCain: Did I say "balance the budget" in 4 years? Psyche!

By GottaLaff

The video is from September 22, 2008:

HARWOOD: Would you concede, then, that you could not achieve your goal of balancing the budget in your first term with this huge bailout added?

MCCAIN: I believe we can still balance the budget.
October 20, 2008, adviser Douglas Holtz-Eakin:
“The events of the past few months have completely thrown a wrench into that, there’s no way round it. He would still like to balance it. It’s going to be harder, take longer,” said Holtz-Eakin at a debate with his Democratic counterpart at Columbia University in New York.
But wait! IWRC* Palin didn't get the memo. October 20, 2008:
Gov. Sarah Palin said that McCain would still balance the budget by the end of his first term.
The word "erratic" comes to mind.

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Republicans for Obama, and more...

By GottaLaff

Ambinder's post repeats a couple of items I've already covered, but I'm including them anyway. Why? Because taken as a whole, Ambinder's article paints quite a picture:

A former publisher of National Review endorses Obama, as does Rep. Wayne Gilchrist of Maryland, a Republican.

Eight new battleground state polls courtesy of Charles Franklin and the University of Wisconsin are here.

How many game-changers can there possibly be?

A president can fire the Chairman of the SEC. No he can't. Yes he can. No he can't. Yes he can, yes he...well, not directly...

This is an actual AP lede: "John McCain either doesn't want to meet Spain's prime minister any time soon or isn't quite sure who he is."

Johnny, we hardly knew ye.

That last "Johnny" part? Here's an excerpt:

There are now not one but two drawn curtains on Mr. McCain’s plane separating his spacious quarters from the press corps. Left idle is the couch that was built in the front of the plane — called “Straight Talk Air” — to reproduce at 30,000 feet the freewheeling chats with reporters that were the stock-in-trade on his bus; the other morning it was covered with newspapers. Mr. McCain, who promised to hold weekly news conferences if elected president, has not held one in more than a month.

He recently began doing town-hall-style meetings with voters, including one with Ms. Palin on Wednesday night in Grand Rapids, Mich.. But these are mostly by invitation only — reminiscent of Mr. Bush’s town-hall-style meetings of 2004 — as was obvious by the succession of softball and adulatory questions floated across his plate.

Buh-bye J Sid, hello Gramm-pa.

Recent Posts