Showing posts with label criminal investigation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label criminal investigation. Show all posts

Monday, May 3, 2010

Pelosi: BushCo Barred Officials From Briefing Congress Pre-'08 Financial Crisis

By GottaLaff

So far, when it comes to legal repercussions for their thuggery, BushCo has skated. Worms like John Yoo, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, and Bush himself are free to write books and spew their toxic venom all over the Tee Vee Machine while America (and what's left of its Constitution) has suffered immensely.

There have been no consequences for holding and torturing hostages at Gitmo and elsewhere, for spying on Americans, for outing a CIA agent, etc., ad nauseam.

Will there be any for this?

Nearly two years after the Wall Street meltdown drove the U.S. economy to the brink of collapse, and forced the U.S. government to prop up major financial institutions with hundreds of billions of dollars, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi now claims that the Bush Administration prohibited its own top officials who were handling the emerging crisis from briefing Congress until a complete financial collapse was only hours away.

In little-noticed statements to reporters over the last few weeks, Pelosi has alleged that the Bush administration knew well in advance of its intervention that the financial crisis would hit, and that Congress would need to authorize a historic and unpopular bailout - but that top officials, including then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, told her that they had been barred from briefing Congress about true extent of the crisis.

If accurate, the allegation could constitute a major indictment of the Bush administration, which may have worsened the crisis and resulting economic fallout by delaying the call for congressional action.

IMHO, with the economy still slogging through a sluggish recovery, the national state of mind could very well default to blame mode and demand a full investigation. One can only hope. And of course, that's only if this story gets media attention.

Will BushCo be excused because it's difficult to prove intent, or because there is no appetite to go after them?

Nor is it clear if the Administration's alleged decision not to brief Congress earlier was a calculated strategy to avoid spooking the already shaky financial markets thus hastening the crisis or, as Pelosi suggests, a political calculation in advance of the 2008 presidential elections, or a combination of the two.

There's much more here. TPM did a great job reporting this.

UPDATE: Bush and Paulson spokesperson fire back.

H/t: hapkidogal

Mark Sanford avoids criminal charges following ethics investigation

By GottaLaff

http://rlv.zcache.com/mark_sanford_dont_cry_for_me_im_in_argentina_tshirt-p235608297378106648o7i1_400.jpg

Mark the C Streeter skates after pleading no contest to ethics charges. However, I wonder what will eventually come of Rachel Maddow's investigations into the suspiciously low rent he paid to live there.

As for the Appalachian Trail hike trip to Argentina sexcapades, he's home free:

South Carolina's Attorney General has decided that Gov. Mark Sanford will not face criminal charges following an investigation into his travel and campaign expenses.

The A.G. said he didn't "knowingly, willfully, and intentionally set out to break state law". He did, however, knowingly, willfully, and intentionally set out to break his family member's hearts.

But on Monday, McMaster said the ethics violations did not rise to the level of criminal conduct. The law, he said, "requires a much higher standard before criminal prosecution is warranted."


This gave Sanford the opportunity to use the word "stalwart":


He said McMaster's decision reaffirms his belief that the Sanford administration has always "been a stalwart defender of the taxpayer. "


Said the man who could very well be residing in a building owned by a group that shouldn't have tax exempt status and treats their favorite members of Congress to cut rates.

Thursday, April 29, 2010

Criminal investigation of Goldman Sachs opened

By GottaLaff

Via an e-mail alert:

WASHINGTON (AP) AP source: US attorney's office in Manhattan opens criminal investigation of Goldman Sachs.

About time.

More details as they come in.

UPDATE:

In its preliminary stage, the investigation by the Manhattan US Attorney's Office is focusing on whether the financial giant or its employees committed securities fraud in connection with its mortgage trading, people familiar with the probe told the daily.

They said the criminal investigation stems from a referral from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).



Wednesday, April 7, 2010

VIDEO- Rachel Maddow Show: ACORN pimp, UNedited

By GottaLaff

This was simply beauteous. Rachel turned the "ACORN pimp" story on its head. If you missed it, now's your chance:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Monday, March 1, 2010

Politico: "ACORN cleared in Brooklyn: 'No criminality' "

By GottaLaff

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/assets_c/2009/09/acorn_logo_nu-cropped-proto-custom_2.jpg

This would not be the first time that that ACORN has been shown to have done nothing illegal. Now we have more evidence. They get cleared... again:

From a March 1 post by Politico's Ben Smith:

Kings County, New York District Attorney Joe Hynes put out a statement just now:

On September 15, 2009, my office began an investigation into possible criminality on the part of three ACORN employees. The three had been secretly videotaped by two people posing as a pimp and prostitute, who came to ACORN'S Brooklyn office, seeking advice about how to purchase a house with money generated by their 'business.' The 'couple' later made the recording public. That investigation is now concluded and no criminality has been found.


No criminality. None.

Unfortunately, as usual, the media reports have already done so much damage, as has the pampered, well-connected Team O'Keefe, and the Rushpublic smear machine, that the ACORN brand has been irreparably marred.

So who's the real pimp here?

But hey, it's the American way.

Wednesday, February 3, 2010

ACORN mounts campaign to ’sting the stinger’

By GottaLaff

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/137680/thumbs/s-OKEEFE-ON-HANNITY-large.jpg


ACORN Pimp/PhoneGater "Jimmy" Olsen O'Keefe is going to have his hands full. He's got legal issues coming out his fedora. Let's hope every charge sticks.

ACORN CEO Bertha Lewis:
"Now that he's proven that [O'Keefe's] law-breaking isn't a one-shot deal, we are demanding that the attorneys general in California and Maryland conduct formal investigations of O'Keefe's actions from last year," Lewis said in the email. [...]

"Regardless of the impact on ACORN, the fact remains that the attorneys general for California and Maryland should be investigating O'Keefe's actions at our offices in those states, especially in light of what has happened in New Orleans" [...]

"[I]t is ACORN's success that has made the Glenn Beck/Karl Rove/Sarah Palin crowd so determined to destroy us," Lewis wrote. "According to a study by the New Organizing Institute (NOI), an estimated 865,000 people cast ballots in 2008 that had been successfully registered by ACORN since 2004."
Brad over at BradBlog had a few interesting little tidbits. Did you know this?
You folks do realize that James O'Keefe never actually wore his ridiculous pimp costume into those ACORN offices on those doctored and illegally recorded video tapes, right? But, rather, he was filmed outside of the offices wearing his get-up, while appearing as the conservatively dressed boyfriend of a hooker trying to escape an abusive pimp when the cameras were rolling inside the offices. That's just one of many deceptions O'Keefe carried out."
That's right: Little Baby James decked himself out like his role models, but only for the videos outside the offices. Once he was with Hookerette, he wore preppy wear. Maybe he just likes to play dress-up.

Let's hope his next outfit is orange.

Again, for the record, ACORN employees have done nothing illegal... unlike Hannity's little protege, Jimmy the Wonder Pimp.

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Blackwater’s Erik Prince to teach high school, reveals CIA role

By GottaLaff

http://almightydad.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/wha.jpg

Some background in my little Blackwater for Dummeez primer here.

Just when you thought you'd heard it all:
For the past six years, Prince "appears to have led an astonishing double life," writes Adam Ciralsky. "Publicly, he has served as Blackwater’s CEO and chairman. Privately, and secretly, he has been doing the CIA’s bidding, helping to craft, fund, and execute operations ranging from inserting personnel into 'denied areas'—places US intelligence has trouble penetrating—to assembling hit teams targeting al-Qaeda members and their allies." [...]

Prince told Ciralsky that he was engaged in work for the CIA "up until two months ago—when Prince says the Obama administration pulled the plug." That would seem to confirm recent news reports that the Obama administration was using Blackwater for assassinations in Pakistan.

Prince also told Ciralsky he plans to step down as chairman and CEO of Blackwater -- a move Ciralsky reports has started a "power struggle" within the company over who will succeed its founder.

“I’m through,” Prince told Vanity Fair. “I’m going to teach high school. ... History and economics. I may even coach wrestling. Hey, Indiana Jones taught school, too.”

You can read the entire Vanity Fair report here.

First and foremost, why is the ObamAdministration getting within 50 miles of Swampwater? Why are they still on the payroll? Yes, I know the obvious answers, but that won't stop me from asking.

Next: I teach high school. I know high school. Erik, you are not high school material. You're not even pig sty material.

Now if you'll excuse me, I have to pick my jaw up off the floor.

Thursday, November 12, 2009

VIDEO: Nidal Malik Hasan is not being charged with terrorism

By GottaLaff

http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/EXID19673/images/resized_Barack_Obama_Fort__Hood_Memorial_speech_pictures.jpg

Per the press conference on MSNBC just now, you might be interested to know that Nidal Hasan, the man who is being charged with 13 counts of premeditated murder at Fr. Hood, is not being charged with terrorism. There may be further charges in the future.

To quote my pal Twitter CindyScott54, "I'm sure that will cause some whigs to flip."

Yes, there was some major ball-dropping, plenty of warning signals, rampant conclusion-jumping, and a whole lot of inappropriate profiling.

And it was without a doubt an inexcusable crime, a devastating tragedy... but officially, it was not terrorism.

Thursday, September 3, 2009

Dep't. of So What Else is New: Alberto Gonzales flip flops on torture investigation

By GottaLaff

Gonzo, August 31, 2009 (posted here yesterday):

Former U.S. Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales on Tuesday defended the decision of his current successor, Eric H. Holder Jr., to investigate alleged prisoner abuse by CIA interrogators over President Obama's desire to look forward.

"As chief prosecutor of the United States, he should make the decision on his own, based on the facts, then inform the White House," said Mr. Gonzales, who was appointed to the post by President George W. Bush in 2005 and resigned in 2007. [...]

"Anyone who politicizes... the interrogations... should be condemned..." he said, unwittingly condemning himself and his fellow thugs.

The Washington Times America's Morning News (interview with Alberto Gonzales)

Gonzo today:
In a new interview with the Washington Times, he said that just because he thinks it’s “legitimate to question and examine” the interrogators’ conduct, he doesn’t endorse an investigation:

I don’t support the investigation by the department because this is a matter that has already been reviewed thoroughly and because I believe that another investigation is going to harm our intelligence gathering capabilities and that’s a concern that’s shared by career intelligence officials and so for those reasons I respectfully disagree with the decision.

He probably just didn't "recall" his previous-- recorded-- statments.

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

AUDIO: Gonzales defends Holder's decision on CIA

By GottaLaff

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiBwxMXYHnd5Z5UUgrfAnbsM3Z0Y8JQscgPiiHzjt0sCE8fDz8wlUd34-qvsecDLh-Aq8Wd2RmrC1-xufpawkxZu-tKv3eRSp1eNdaAuct0daA2lRLmLSWM6CdHQwKHF8Y4t4pFAgunXGgh/s1600/AlbertoGonzalesClap.jpg

The Washington Times has this exclusive... probably because nobody else wanted to listen to Gonzo:

Former U.S. Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales on Tuesday defended the decision of his current successor, Eric H. Holder Jr., to investigate alleged prisoner abuse by CIA interrogators over President Obama's desire to look forward.

"As chief prosecutor of the United States, he should make the decision on his own, based on the facts, then inform the White House," said Mr. Gonzales, who was appointed to the post by President George W. Bush in 2005 and resigned in 2007.

Of course he also said BushCo lawyers clearly defined which "interrogation techniques" were legal. You know why they did that, Gonzo? Because they rewrote the law so that they could legalize torture.

Maybe he agrees with Holder because the narrow parameters of the investigation would let him off the hook for his own involvement. Paddy and I are scratching our heads a little over this one.

"Anyone who politicizes... the interrogations... should be condemned..." he said, unwittingly condemning himself and his fellow thugs.

I need a drink. Here's the entire interview:

The Washington Times America's Morning News (interview with Alberto Gonzales)


Sunday, August 30, 2009

Dickless in DC: Obama's torture investigation "offends the hell out of me"

By GottaLaff

http://www.helpinghandsgroup.org/images/the_missing_piece_book.jpg

This is the biggest endorsement of Barack Obama that I can think of, and it comes by way of Dickless Cheney:
"I was not a fan of his when he got elected, and my views have not changed any," Cheney said of Obama.
That should bring multitudes of voters our way. We owe him.

Oddly, my favorite quote has been removed from the AP piece. It was in regard to Dickless' claim that-- stop me if you've heard this one, it's a knee-slapper-- Obama is politicizing investigations, those unnecessary CIA ones. About BushCo's illegal torture of detainees? Yeah, those investigations.

Now maybe the quote was never in there to begin with, but that would be odd, because here is the The Daily Beast version that they attribute to the Associated Press:
“It’s clearly a political move,” the former vice president told Fox News Sunday when he was asked about the Obama administration’s investigation of CIA interrogations. “[It] offends the hell out of me. … I just think it's an outrageous political act...."
Here is the AP version:

"It's clearly a political move," Cheney said in an interview aired on "Fox News Sunday." "I mean, there's no other rationale for why they're doing this."

He added: "I just think it's an outrageous political act that will do great damage, long term, to our capacity to be able to have people take on difficult jobs, make difficult decisions, without having to worry about what the next administration is going to say."

The Case of the Missing "Offends the Hell Out of Me". Maybe Dickless is no longer offended? Offensive, yes; offended, no longer. Who knew he could be so forgiving?

Tuesday, August 25, 2009

Republican Peter King calls Holder investigation of BushCo/CIA 'bulls**t'

By GottaLaff

http://www.newsday.com/polopoly_fs/1.1320353.1248532690!image/371569715.jpg_gen/derivatives/display_600/371569715.jpg

See, Rep. Peter King, when crimes are committed, investigations are necessary. People were tortured and murdered. That cannot be ignored. That demands scrutiny. If it's inconvenient, too bad. If they were committed by members of your own party, too freakin' bad.

"It's bullsh*t. It's disgraceful. You wonder which side they're on," the Long Island Republican told Politico Tuesday.

They're on the side of justice, Pete.

On Monday, Attorney Gen. Eric Holder asked federal prosecutor John Durham to examine whether CIA interrogations of suspected terrorists were illegal in the months and years after the September 11 attacks. [...]

The White House said Tuesday that President Obama supported Holder's decision.

"It's a total breach of faith, and either the president is intentionally caving to the left wing of his party or he's lost control of his administration," King said Tuesday.

No, Petey, it's the Rushpublics who have lost control... all control. Need proof? Attend any town hall meeting. The assault weapons are a dead giveaway.

Then read what I've referenced below the ********* line. Then read Jane Mayer's The Dark Side. Then re-read (if indeed, you've ever read it to begin with) the U.S. Constitution and the Geneva Conventions.

Then remember-- if you're one of those who feels it necessary to look forward and not back-- that all crimes took place in the past. That's how we know they happened.

And if anyone says otherwise, it's bulls**t.

************************

All my previous posts on this subject matter can be found here; That link includes one specific to only Fayiz al-Kandari's story here. Here are audio and video interviews with Lt. Col. Wingard, one by David Shuster, one by Ana Marie Cox, and more. My guest commentary at BuzzFlash is here.

If you are inclined to help rectify these injustices: Twitterers, use the hashtag #FreeFayiz. We have organized a team to get these stories out. If you are interested in helping Fayiz out, e-mail me at The Political Carnival, address in sidebar to the right; or tweet me at @GottaLaff.

If you'd like to see other ways you can take action, go here and scroll down to the end of the article.

Then read Jane Mayer's book The Dark Side. You'll have a much greater understanding of why I post endlessly about this, and why I'm all over the CIA deception issues, too.

More of Fayiz's story here, at Answers.com.

Monday, August 24, 2009

CIA Inspector General Report Implicates DOJ Lawyers Again

By GottaLaff

http://images.cutoutandkeep.net/steps/20603/20603.jpg

This is why I'm hoping that pulling on that one tiny legal thread will eventually unravel much more:

As the report explains, CIA interrogators had to sign an acknowledgment that they’d read the Department of Central Intelligence guidelines.

Although the DCI Guidelines are an improvement over the absence of such DCI Guidelines in the past, they still leave substantial room for misinterpretation and do not cover all Agency detention and interrogation activities.

If the Justice Department lawyers who approved those guidelines knew they left substantial room for misinterpretation but approved them anyway, they could be implicated in encouraging the interrogators’ transgressions. Whether that’s a criminal offense, an ethics violation or just sloppy lawyering, it directly implicates the Justice Department in the CIA’s actions. [...]

[T]he Justice Department played a key role in the development and approval of policies that led to the torture and abuse of detainees. And one way or another, any real probe into what happened and how to keep it from happening again will have to address that.

BushCo and their legal minions must be held accountable. Whether that will happen or not is debatable, even doubtful. But it would be a sad day for the United States if they weren't.

Why?

Try this for starters:

******************

All my previous posts on this subject matter can be found here; That link includes one specific to only Fayiz al-Kandari's story here. Here are audio and video interviews with Lt. Col. Wingard, one by David Shuster, one by Ana Marie Cox, and more. My guest commentary at BuzzFlash is here.

If you are inclined to help rectify these injustices: Twitterers, use the hashtag #FreeFayiz. We have organized a team to get these stories out. If you are interested in helping Fayiz out, e-mail me at The Political Carnival, address in sidebar to the right; or tweet me at @GottaLaff.

If you'd like to see other ways you can take action, go here and scroll down to the end of the article.

Then read Jane Mayer's book The Dark Side. You'll have a much greater understanding of why I post endlessly about this, and why I'm all over the CIA deception issues, too.

More of Fayiz's story here, at Answers.com.

BREAKING: Attorney General to appoint prosecutor to investigate CIA (corrected)

By GottaLaff

Per MSNBC and on Twitter, via Jeremy Scahill, Holder will investigate alleged abuse:

AG Holder 2 appoint prosecutor 4 CIA torture. Demand investigation of top officials, not just foot soldiers...
Here's more from the Washington Post:
Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. has decided to appoint a prosecutor to examine nearly a dozen cases in which CIA interrogators and contractors may have violated anti-torture laws and other statutes when they allegedly threatened terrorism suspects, according to two sources familiar with the move.

Holder is poised to name John Durham, a career Justice Department prosecutor from Connecticut, to lead the inquiry, according to the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the process is not complete.

Durham's mandate, the sources added, will be relatively narrow: to look at whether there is enough evidence to launch a full-scale criminal investigation of current and former CIA personnel who may have broken the law in their dealings with detainees.
Scahill says we should demand that top officials be investigated, too. Hear, hear (go here to sign a petition from Amnesty International U.S.A.). More from WaPo:
With Monday's looming public announcement, however, the attorney general and his national security team appear to be staking out a middle ground -- rejecting a broad inquiry that could result in possible prosecutions of Justice Department lawyers in the Bush years as well as cabinet officers who developed counterterrorism policy; but giving civil liberties advocates at least part of what they wanted without supporting a full, independent truth commission to examine a host of Bush national security practices.

US Justice Dept advises pursuing CIA abuses

By GottaLaff


The Big Kahuna Torture Report is due out today, and there's a lot of news breaking. Here's the latest:
The U.S. Justice Department has recommended reopening nearly a dozen prisoner-abuse cases, which could expose CIA employees and contractors to prosecution for their treatment of terrorism suspects, The New York Times said on Monday.

The recommendation, reversing the Bush administration, came from the Justice Department's ethics office and has been presented to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder.

The department is due to disclose later on Monday details of prisoner abuse that were gathered in 2004 by the CIA's inspector general but have never been released, according to the Times report, which cited an unnamed person officially briefed on matter. [...]

"With the release of the details on Monday and the formal advice that at least some cases be reopened, it now seems all but certain that the appointment of a prosecutor or other concrete steps will follow, posing significant new problems for the CIA," the Times said.

The recommendation to review the cases centres mainly on allegations of detainee abuse in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Hear that, Fayiz? We've got our fingers crossed for a real crack at the truth.

******************

All my previous posts on this subject matter can be found here; That link includes one specific to only Fayiz al-Kandari's story here. Here are audio and video interviews with Lt. Col. Wingard, one by David Shuster, one by Ana Marie Cox, and more. My guest commentary at BuzzFlash is here.

If you are inclined to help rectify these injustices: Twitterers, use the hashtag #FreeFayiz. We have organized a team to get these stories out. If you are interested in helping Fayiz out, e-mail me at The Political Carnival, address in sidebar to the right; or tweet me at @GottaLaff.

If you'd like to see other ways you can take action, go here and scroll down to the end of the article.

Then read Jane Mayer's book The Dark Side. You'll have a much greater understanding of why I post endlessly about this, and why I'm all over the CIA deception issues, too.

More of Fayiz's story here, at Answers.com.

Sunday, August 23, 2009

Former Top Interrogators Back Wide-Ranging Criminal Probe Into Torture

By GottaLaff

http://www.makethemaccountable.com/images/0904/YouMustProsecute.gif
(cartoon via, and Jamiol’s World)

My new bff, Jason Leopold, has a terrific post that you can find here. Please read the whole thing. I didn't do it justice (no pun):

Three of the country’s former top counterterrorism interrogators and intelligence experts, are speaking out publicly in support of a wide-ranging criminal investigation into the Bush administration’s use of torture against “war on terror” detainees, and have also urged Congress to launch a separate probe to review how the policies that lead to torture were created.

Jack Cloonan, a former FBI security and counterterrorism expert who was assigned to the agency’s elite Bin Laden Unit, Col. Steve Kleinman, a career military intelligence officer recognized as one of the Defense Department’s most prolific interrogators, and Matthew Alexander, a senior interrogator for a special operations task force in Iraq whose team captured down Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the leader of al-Qaeda in Iraq, said ignoring clear-cut evidence of interrogation-related crimes would only lead to further law breaking in the future. Alexander uses a pseudonym for security reasons.

In an interview, Cloonan and Kleinman, both of who conducted interrogations of terror suspects after 9/11, also sharply disputed recent claims by former CIA Director Michael Hayden and Republican lawmakers that a criminal investigation would have a grave impact on intelligence gathering and may lead to another 9/11-type attack on the homeland.

At a panel discussion held at the National Press Club Thursday on outsourcing intelligence, Hayden said an investigation, “no matter how narrowly defined” will “start pulling threads." [...]

“What this is really about is cover your ass,” Cloonan said about the senators’ letter. “To suggest [intelligence gathering] will come to a screeching halt if there were an investigation is not accurate.”

Kleinman, who most recently served as a senior adviser on a Director of National Intelligence-commissioned study on strategic interrogation, agreed.

“I respectfully disagree profoundly with the assessment that any effort to look back would make us more vulnerable, Kleinman said. “In fact, we have to look back to show our utmost vulnerabilities.

“I’ve had the honor of testifying before four committees of Congress and I am always astounded at the profound political partisan politics that surround this issue. I’m a professional interrogator I have 25 years of experience in this and I don’t have any concern whatsoever that an investigation into how we conducted ourselves since 9/11 would in any way undermine our ability to continue gathering intelligence.”

Furthermore, Kleinman and Cloonan believe their colleagues in the intelligence community share their views. But many are unable to speak out publicly. [...]

Kleinman and Cloonan added that the outside contractors and the interrogators who lacked the training and experience are the ones who saw the use of torture as a means to gain valuable information. Moreover, they are likely the ones who fear an investigation.

“The people who are true professionals don’t see anything wrong with an investigation,” Kleinman said. “I conducted interrogations in three separate military campaigns. I can look back if they called me in tomorrow and I would not even be thinking about getting liability insurance.

I simply can't wrap my mind around ignoring crimes like ordering/committing torture and convoluting our legal system in order to justify it, especially after reading Jason's post.

Setting a terrible precedent is just one of the consequences of inaction. The many, many posts I've written (see below) help to explain why I feel so strongly.

******************

All my previous posts on this subject matter can be found here; That link includes one specific to only Fayiz al-Kandari's story here. Here are audio and video interviews with Lt. Col. Wingard, one by David Shuster, one by Ana Marie Cox, and more. My guest commentary at BuzzFlash is here.

If you are inclined to help rectify these injustices: Twitterers, use the hashtag #FreeFayiz. We have organized a team to get these stories out. If you are interested in helping Fayiz out, e-mail me at The Political Carnival, address in sidebar to the right; or tweet me at @GottaLaff.

If you'd like to see other ways you can take action, go here and scroll down to the end of the article.

Then read Jane Mayer's book The Dark Side. You'll have a much greater understanding of why I post endlessly about this, and why I'm all over the CIA deception issues, too.

More of Fayiz's story here, at Answers.com.

Tuesday, August 4, 2009

Blackwater Founder Implicated in Murder + Bonus Blackwater for Dummeez!

By GottaLaff



Via Jeremy Scahill:
A former Blackwater employee and an ex-US Marine who has worked as a security operative for the company have made a series of explosive allegations in sworn statements filed on August 3 in federal court in Virginia. The two men claim that the company's owner, Erik Prince, may have murdered or facilitated the murder of individuals who were cooperating with federal authorities investigating the company. The former employee also alleges that Prince "views himself as a Christian crusader tasked with eliminating Muslims and the Islamic faith from the globe," and that Prince's companies "encouraged and rewarded the destruction of Iraqi life."

In their testimony, both men also allege that
Blackwater was smuggling weapons into Iraq. One of the men alleges that Prince turned a profit by transporting "illegal" or "unlawful" weapons into the country on Prince's private planes. They also charge that Prince and other Blackwater executives destroyed incriminating videos, emails and other documents and have intentionally deceived the US State Department and other federal agencies. The identities of the two individuals were sealed out of concerns for their safety.

These allegations, and a series of other charges, are contained in sworn affidavits, given under penalty of perjury, filed late at night on August 3 in the Eastern District of Virginia
as part of a seventy-page motion by lawyers for Iraqi civilians suing Blackwater for alleged war crimes and other misconduct.
Well over a year ago, I wrote up a post called Blackwater for Dummeez. I think it's time to repost it (keep in mind, the information was compiled in October 2007):

What is Blackwater USA, boys and girls? Blackwater USA is an international security contractor founded in 1997 by Erik Prince and is based in the U.S, . state of North Carolina where it operates a tactical training facility that it claims is the world's largest. Wow!

Let's take a peek into their world, in their very own words, where they claim to be: "The most comprehensive professional military, law enforcement, security, peacekeeping, and stability operations company in the world".

Our leadership and dedicated family of exceptional employees adheres to an essential of core corporate values- chief among these are integrity, innovation, excellence, respect, accountability, and teamwork.

In doing this, we have become the most responsive, cost-effective means of affecting the strategic balance in support of security and peace, and freedom and democracy everywhere.

Blackwater's Federal Contracts

Year Amount Paid

2001 $736,906

2002 $3,415,884

2003 $25,395,556

2004 $48,496,903

2005 $352,871,817

2006 $593,601,952

Well, howdy-do, that's impressive!

Now! What do they do? Stuff that includes integrity, innovation, excellence, respect, accountability, and teamwork? Nah, they were just kidding. They do this:

The lead Suburban in our convoy loomed up behind an old, puttering sedan driven by an older man with a young woman and three children. As we approached at typical breakneck speed, the Blackwater driver honked furiously and motioned to the side, as if they should pull over. The kids in the back seat looked back in horror, mouths agape at the sight of the heavily armored Suburbans driven by large, armed men in dark sunglasses. The poor Iraqi driver frantically searched fora means of escape, but there was none. So the lead Blackwater vehicle smashed heedlessly into the car, pushing it into the barrier. We zoomed by too quickly to notice if anyone was hurt.

That's what they do.

Who's in charge? Just a dickens of a guy! Erik Prince! And what a resume has he!

Born: 6-Jun-1969 Religion: Born-Again Christian Race or Ethnicity: White
Sexual orientation: Straight Occupation: Business, Military Party Affiliation: Republican Executive summary: Founder, Blackwater USA Military service: Navy SEAL Team Officer (1993-96, Bosnia, Haiti)<

Erik Prince is a multi-millionaire right-wing fundamentalist Christian from a powerful Michigan Republican family. His wealth came from his father, Edgar Prince (d. 1995, billionaire, started Family Research Council with Gary Bauer). A major Republican campaign contributor, he interned in the White House of President George H.W. Bush and campaigned for Pat Buchanan in 1992, finding time to intern for conservative congressman Dana Rohrabacher as well. Prince founded the security and mercenary firm Blackwater USA in 1997 with Gary Jackson, another former Navy SEAL.

Prince's sister Betsy DeVos is a powerful conservative in her own right. Married to the son of Richard DeVos (Republican bankroller and co-founder of Amway), she served as chair of Michigan Republican Party in the 1990s. His mom is Elsa Prince Broekhuizen (Republican Party funder, remarried)

Can you say mercenary? I knew that you could. Now why would I go and ask a thing like that? Here's why!

In the capital, American officials said a joint U.S.-Iraqi commission formed to look into last month's shooting incident in which Blackwater USA security guards killed at least 11 Iraqis had yet to meet. In addition, most members of an FBI team that also will investigate the Sept. 16 shootings have not arrived and probably will not get to Iraq until next week, said U.S. Embassy spokeswoman Mirembe Nantongo.

Why, there were more killings than we can count! There was the one where a drunk killed a guard on Christmas, and there was one where…oh never mind. Now remember, boys and girls, killing is bad. Killing for money is worse. And killing for money with no repercussions is worst of all!

No need to worry, because there's o-ver-sight. Can you say oversight? Yes, the U.S. Congress is on the job! Or are they...?

Darrell Issa: On the "Democrat side", this isn't about Blackwater. It's a repeat of the MoveOn dot Org attack on Petraeus' patriotism. They'll simply switch targets. I'm here to defend General Petraeus and our men and women in uniform.
Oooopsies! Well, kids, sometimes love can be misplaced. Erik Prince has a lot of love to share, too, but in the form of big fat checks:

Prince's latest donation was in July, when he gave $20,000 to the National Republican Congressional Committee. California recipients of Prince's $1,000 checks include Reps. Jerry Lewis and Duncan Hunter, a current GOP presidential candidate, and former Rep. Richard Pombo.

The former serviceman has given almost all of his donations to Republicans. There was, however, an exception in 2006, when he donated $5,000 to the Green Party of Lucerne County, Pa. That was a Republican ploy to ensure the Green Party's U.S. senate candidate got on the ballot in an effort to peel votes away from Democrat Bob Casey and help Republican Rick Santorum. The effort failed and Casey won.

What's a mercenary to do? He has to invest his hard earned wages somewhere, doesn't he?

Well, kiddies, that's enough for today. No go eat your supper before it gets cold. You can sit in front of the TV and catch up on the latest news. What could be more fun than all the dinner you can eat, and all the Blackwater you can stomach?

Thursday, July 30, 2009

Emails Implicate Rove in Prosecutor Firings

By GottaLaff

http://legalmarketing.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/duh_2.jpg
http://images.cafepress.com/image/12249879_400x400.jpg
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/89/208679430_c989e8da9f.jpg?v=0

From the Department of Tell Us Something We Don't Know:
"Political adviser Karl Rove and other high-ranking figures in the Bush White House played a greater role than previously understood in the firing of federal prosecutors almost three years ago, according to e-mails obtained by the Washington Post, in a scandal that led to mass Justice Department resignations and an ongoing criminal probe."
Emptywheel has more.

Thursday, July 23, 2009

Physicians at Guantanamo violate medical ethics: study

By GottaLaff

http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/40950000/jpg/_40950860_demo_b203_pa.jpg

Unabashedly sounding like a broken record, I will remind you to pick up a copy of Jane Mayer's The Dark Side. She goes into some detail about the role of medical professionals at Gitmo. It's disturbing, to say the least.
The use of physicians at the US prison camp in Guantanamo Bay has forced medical professionals to violate their ethics codes, according to findings published Thursday in the UK journal Lancet.

The roles that medical professionals have been called on to play at the controversial detention facility "has damaged the integrity of the physicians working for the military and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)," the study said.

"These physicians had a conflict of loyalty because of their ethical obligations to their imprisoned patients and the Bush administration's demands to further the goals and interests of military commanders and intelligence officials."

The paper was authored by Leonard Rubenstein, executive director of Physicians for Human Rights, and George Annas, a professor at Boston University and an expert on bioethics.

Basing their arguments on a Pentagon report on procedures at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, the authors argue military directives allowing force-feeding of detainees and the use of behavioral scientists in interrogations has led medical professionals at the facility to violate ethics rules. [...]

The paper says "little comfort" can be derived from the Pentagon's insistence that behavioral scientists at Guantanamo comply with "governing policies and procedures."

How ironic, using the word "comfort" in any context relating to Gitmo. How appalling that "governing policies and procedures" like these were literally dictated by BushCo. Again, read the book.

"As with force-feeding, the policies are flawed because they invite and even require unethical behavior."

The authors recommend the Pentagon abandon the use of force-feeding and the involvement of behavioral scientists in interrogations. They also call for "independent medical reviews" of the physical and mental health of detainees and a commission inquiry into US detention policy and the role of physicians.

How many demands for investigations will there be? What are we up to now, 3, 12, 15, 40? It doesn't really matter. What does matter is that so many reports like this are being released. And with each report, more attention is paid to the horrific stories about detainees like Fayiz al-Kandari. Now let's do something. Take action, ease your conscience.

All my previous posts on this subject matter can be found here; That link includes audio and video interviews with Lt. Col. Wingard, one by David Shuster, one by Ana Marie Cox, and more. My guest commentary at BuzzFlash is here.

If you are inclined to help rectify these injustices: Twitterers, use the hashtag #FreeFayiz. We have organized a team to get these stories out. If you are interested in helping Fayiz out, e-mail me at The Political Carnival, address in sidebar to the right; or tweet me at @GottaLaff.

If you'd like to see other ways you can take action, go here and scroll down to the end of the article.

Then read Jane Mayer's book The Dark Side. You'll have a much greater understanding of why I post endlessly about this, and why I'm all over the CIA deception issues, too.

More of Fayiz's story here, at Answers.com.

Freed Gitmo Detainees Claim Post-Obama Torture, Mistreatment

By GottaLaff



Lt. Col. Barry Wingard is a military lawyer who represents Guantanamo Bay detainee Fayiz al-Kandari. Fayiz was suspected of being a terrorist and a follower of Osama bin Laden, and has been imprisoned and brutally mistreated (I call it torture, although "legally", that may not apply) for over seven and a half years. He was sold for bounty, and the so-called evidence against him is hearsay upon hearsay. He has not yet had a trial. Sound familiar?
Boumediene, a 43-year-old Algerian, spent the last seven and a half years in Guantanamo. He was held there because he was suspected of being a terrorist and a follower of Osama bin Laden. After the 9/11 terrorist attacks, he was seen as one of those dangerous people the United States wanted to keep locked behind bars for as long as possible. This would be done without charges and without a trial, under a set of special laws that ignored the Geneva Conventions on the treatment of prisoners of war.
Lather, wince, repeat.

Once there, Boumediene claims that he was tortured for 16 days. He says that he was kept awake day and night and forced to walk across sharp stones with his bare feet tied together. He also claims that he was told that if he refused to confess, his handlers would put makeup on and rape him.

Other detainees have recounted similar events, which were part of the special interrogation methods authorized by then-President George W. Bush. [...]

"They put him in a terribly cold cell with 50 degrees Fahrenheit (10 degrees Celsius)," says Kirsch. "For the first days he had no running water, and he had to sleep on a pad less than one-centimeter thick visibly stained and smelling of food, vomit and feces." According to Kirsch, Boumediene was "kept isolated there" for 10 days, until Feb. 10, and was "not permitted to shower, pray or change his clothes. He was force fed using violent methods that were intended to and did injure him, and there was no medical treatment" for a foot injury.

When Kirsch met with his client on Feb. 12, Boumediene showed the lawyer the bruises covering his body. Kirsch then complained to the Pentagon about Boumediene's treatment. "At that time, an American judge already had ruled my client should be a free man, but the military still would not deliver to him hundreds of letters his wife, daughters and other family members had written to him over the years he was imprisoned illegally," Kirsch adds. Boumediene eventually did receive a few of the letters, but only on May 15, the day of his release.

I do not like posting this, because I am an Obama supporter (obviously, not a blind follower), and believe in many of the things he has accomplished, and hopes to accomplish. However, we can't ignore this story, Fayiz's story, or any others. We can't afford to:

The US Department of Defense denies all these accusations; it claims that they are unfounded and that procedures at Guantanamo have been reviewed. But Kirsch is convinced that the treatment of detainees like Boumediene violates the Geneva Conventions.

Ironically, the delegation that the Pentagon sent to Guantanamo came to similar conclusions about the conditions there, noting that abuse and mistreatment had, in fact, occurred. But the Pentagon officials insisted that the soldiers in question were disciplined, ordered to undergo special training or discharged. Otherwise, its report was positive.

Other reports about the mistreatment of prisoners at Guantanamo have also emerged since Obama became president in January. Mohammed el Gharani, who was released and returned to his native Chad in April, claims that, until his last day at Guantanamo, soldiers beat him with sticks and used pepper spray on him whenever he refused to leave his cell. Another detainee has corroborated Gharani's claims.

"We never imagined that detainee abuse would continue after Jan. 20," says Michael Ratner, the head of the New York-based Center for Constitutional Rights. Ratner coordinates the legal defense of Guantanamo detainees. Across the ocean, the London-based organization Reprieve, which has defended many Guantanamo prisoners over the years, is now calling for an independent investigative commission to be appointed.

All my previous posts on this subject matter can be found here; That link includes audio and video interviews with Lt. Col. Wingard, one by David Shuster, one by Ana Marie Cox, and more. My guest commentary at BuzzFlash is here.

If you are inclined to help rectify these injustices: Twitterers, use the hashtag #FreeFayiz. We have organized a team to get these stories out. If you are interested in helping Fayiz out, e-mail me at The Political Carnival, address in sidebar to the right; or tweet me at @GottaLaff.

If you'd like to see other ways you can take action, go here and scroll down to the end of the article.

Then read Jane Mayer's book The Dark Side. You'll have a much greater understanding of why I post endlessly about this, and why I'm all over the CIA deception issues, too.

More of Fayiz's story here, at Answers.com.

Recent Posts