Holy crap. Joe sure wrapped both those questions up. Church and state above, Rove V Wade below.
Wednesday, October 1, 2008
Biden VS Palin On Separation Of Church And State, Roe V Wade
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Recent Posts
.jpg)
Posts
15 comments:
Holy Crap? Is that a slur or an affirmation? I believe the latter! Get your f'n church out of my damn government witch!
Bite me F.
Heh, Josh Marshall calls it- Couric Inflicts Death By Questions. LOL
Ok.
Good job, Papa Joe. :)
Biden talked about the country and the Constitution and history. Palin talked about herself - what she wants, what she believes, what she would like to see happen.
Biden believes in the Constitution. Palin believes the opposite - she wants laws based on what the majority of people in a specific area want. She doesn't get the the Constitution was supposed to protect the minority from the tyranny of the majority. If it were not so, there would have been no amendments to guarantee the right to speak out against the majority, publish articles critical of the gov't, to have a lawyer and to not give evidence against yourself.
This is more than a flawed character - it's a complete lack of understanding what it really means to be an American.
Brutal! Thanks, Paddy.
McCain votes no
Nado when I opened up the comments I was thinking holy crap only to see your comment - great minds! Anywho WTF was that about the Supreme court cases... don't really know but I wonder how much different she can be tomorrow...
Death penalty?
Yeah, sure! Thanks fine! But other than that I'm pro-life.
Oh, and a Supreme Court case that I disagree with was Plessy vs. Ferguson.
You couldn't even think of that one?
Plessy v. Ferguson? That was about " separate but equal" ( in reality, separate but you are still inferior to us, you know).
I came up with four this morning before I even had my coffee- Roe, Brown v. the Board of Education, Miranda v. Arizona, and Dred Scott. That was, again, before coffee. I got Plessy after coffee, as well as Mapp v. Ohio ( illegally seized evidence cannot be used at trial), Griswold v. Connecticut ( right to privacy), United States v. Nixon, Texas v. Johnson ( flag burning as first amendment right), and the most famour case in the last quarter century, Bush v. Gore. And I don't even LIVE in the U.S., and we do not study the Supreme Court in Canadian schools ( outside of the fact it exists).
I'm still more qualified to be vice president that Sarah Palin- and I don't even meet the constitutional requirements.
Gosh! Saracudda didn't even have any issues with Exxon Shipping v. Baker and its ramifications for her home state? Whatever . . .
If Joe just keeps it well-informed and reasonable on Thursday night, Sarah will take care of burying herself.
Dear me, I didn't think it was possible to make her look worse.
There is no video showing on this page. Can someone let me know if they could see it on their computer?
Or do you have a URL so I could see it from another source?
nevermind
It just showed up.
Post a Comment