By GottaLaff
Let's see if we can follow this: The Party of No unifies around a message of obstruction. But the Tea Baggers are obstructing too, only they're blocking each other. They aren't joining in each other's reindeer games. And within the Tea Bagger gang, there are a couple of different Tea Bagger gangs who sit at different lunch tables and won't share Twinkies with their brethren. But they do have the words "tea" and "party" in common.
And that turns out to be a problem:
On April 14, a U.S. District Court in West Palm Beach, Florida, saw papers filed from more than one faction of the fractious movement each claiming the intellectual property rights to the name "Tea Party."
Intellectual? That must be a typo. There is nothing "intellectual" about Tea Tantrumers.
Let's recap:
The unruly group within a larger unruly group that won't play with the other unruly group but shares a common name wants control of the name that the various unruly groups claim ownership of as opposed to affiliating themselves with the GOP.
Clear?
Short version: They're going to federal court over the name "Tea Party".
That would be the same federal court that is "organized under the Constitution and laws of the federal government of the United States." The very same one that infringes on the Tea Tantrumers' liberties. Yeah, that one.
Will you excuse me for a minute? I need some popcorn and a refreshing beverage with a bendy straw.
And because it just wouldn't be millennial politics, or legal actions for that matter, without a little mud-slinging, each side is calling the other's political loyalties into question.
See how amusing splitting the Republican vote can be?
More here.
H/t: Coopster04