By GottaLaff

Did the Party of No just morph into the Party of Oops? That sound you hear could very well be a very loud Rushpublic backfire.
Since the GOP will put up a fight no matter who President Obama chooses as a Supreme Court nominee, what difference will it make whether the candidate is centrist, liberal, or shamelessly progressive?
[I]n some ways "that realization is liberating for the president" to choose whomever he pleases, an administration official told TPMDC.
In comments that are at odds with the conventional wisdom about what Obama needs to do to make sure the Senate confirms his nominee to replace John Paul Stevens, a White House official involved in the confirmation process tells TPMDC that the President isn't taking a cautious approach to selecting a nominee. Despite having one less Democrat in the Senate than when Sonia Sotomayor was confirmed last year, the administration isn't limiting itself to reviewing only centrist candidates for the court vacancy, the official said.
"It doesn't matter who he chooses, there is going to be a big 'ol fight over it. So he doesn't have to get sidetracked by those sorts of concerns," the official told me.
Prez O doesn't seem too pressured. Then again, he rarely, if ever, does.
Many in the blogosphere, on the Tee Vee Machine, the Radio Machine, the Twitter Machine, and every other sphere and machine, have been saying the same thing for some time.
Now let's hope the president chooses a nominee that will be able to be as persuasive and reasonable as Justice Stevens, and just a smidge or nine to the left of him for good measure.
Corporate judicial activism must be stopped in its tracks, or democracy as we know it will wither away.
H/t: Glenn Greenwald