Showing posts with label Sen. Ben Nelson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sen. Ben Nelson. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

GOP +1 block financial reform bill for third time

By GottaLaff

Here's all you really need to know:


The Party of No, plus Nelson.

Third Senate Test Vote on Financial Overhaul Bill Fails 56-42

Between meeting in back rooms with the Big Bankers, and showing America who their real BFF are by refusing to allow financial reform, all the Rushpublics are doing is exposing themselves to be the obstructionists they are... all while reminding everyone who pays them to be that way.

Keep those votes coming, Dems.

UPDATE: Claire McCaskill makes a good point. She just said on MSNBC that the GOP pretends they don't want to block the bill, while they block the bill.

Monday, February 8, 2010

Who needs Republicans when you've got Ben Nelson?

By GottaLaff



This is what I meant earlier when I said 60 (or 59) Democrats in the Senate is not what the media insists it is (a block of 60-- or 59-- votes):
Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) announced Monday that he will oppose the nomination of Craig Becker to serve on the National Labor Relations Board, likely dooming the nominee’s Senate confirmation.
Thank you Ben. You proved my point.
The controversy surrounding the nomination is due principally to Becker’s background, which many believe displays an anti-free-market and pro-union bent. Becker is a labor lawyer who has served as associate general counsel to the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and the AFL-CIO. For the past 27 years, Becker has taught and practiced labor law and written articles expressing extremely pro-union, anti-business views.
Just FYI:
Senator Ben Nelson 2005 - 2010


Top 20 Contributors to Campaign Cmte

Rank ↓Contributor ↓Total ↓Indivs ↓PACs ↓
1NelNet Inc$52,100$34,100$18,000
2Berkshire Hathaway$46,800$45,800$1,000
3Level 3 Communications$39,600$34,600$5,000
4Omaha Steaks$36,100$36,100$0
5AT&T Inc$32,750$10,750$22,000
6Amgen Inc$28,250$14,250$14,000
7Nebraska Beef$25,150$25,150$0
8Microsoft Corp$24,800$15,800$9,000
9Union Pacific Corp$24,750$18,750$6,000
10Prudential Financial$24,500$20,000$4,500
11Citigroup Inc$23,700$12,200$11,500
1221st Century Systems$23,500$15,900$7,600
13PMA Group$22,100$19,100$3,000
14Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp$20,900$9,900$11,000
15Aetna Inc$20,250$11,250$9,000
16Altria Group$20,000$3,000$17,000
16Comcast Corp$20,000$10,500$9,500
18Cauthen, Forbes & Williams$19,650$19,650$0
19Healthsouth Corp$19,150$9,150$10,000
20American Interventional Pain Physicians$19,000$0$19,000
20Schering-Plough Corp$19,000$0$19,000

Monday, February 1, 2010

DNC gave $500K to anti-public option Ben Nel$on's health care ad campaign

By GottaLaff



This will ruffle more than a few feathers, mine included:

Americablog discovers the DNC sent nearly $500,000 to the Nebraska Democratic Committee to run advertisements defending Sen. Ben Nelson's (D-NE) vote for health care reform.

"Nelson announced his support for the much-weakened Senate health care bill on December 19, 2009. He cast his vote for final passage on December 24, 2009. The DNC transferred money to the Nebraska party on December 28, 2009. You do the math."
More from Sudbay:
So, not only did Nelson get bought off with Medicaid funding from the federal treasury, it now appears he got TV ads, paid for by supporters of real health care reform, praising him for killing real reform. As David Dayen noted last week, Nelson was fully prepared to torpedo the bill anyway.

Most state parties would greatly appreciate a $500,000 infusion of cash from the DNC. That doesn't happen very often.
It sure doesn't. Imagine those who could have made, you know, good use of money like that, instead of anti-public option, anti-Medicare-buy-in, anti-abortion rights Nelson.

Way to unify the party, DNC. Enjoy siding with obstructionists much? Apparently, real health care reform and the lives of millions of Americans weren't a huge priority.

As Greg Sargent puts it:
Joe Sudbay reports that your donations to the DNC may have funded ads praising Ben Nelson for watering down reform — perhaps not the goal you intended.
No, perhaps not. Not even close.

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Captionary: How Schumer Won Over Nelson edition

By GottaLaff


(via)

Chuck could have simply blackmailed him with this photo:
Politico tells the story of how Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) went hunting with Sen. Ben Nelson (D-NE) in the latter's home state and how, six weeks later, Schumer secured Nelson's crucial vote on health care reform.
Let's hearken back to the days of Dickless McHeartStent during his BushCo hunting stents, er, stints:

http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2006/02/13/cheneyrifle_wideweb__470x407,0.jpg
http://agitprop.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2007/06/27/whittington.jpg

Thursday, December 17, 2009

Sock-puppet VIDEO mocking Lieberman

By GottaLaff

MoveOn nailed him, right down to the whiny voice and wrinkled sock face:

The video is part of a fundraising drive intended to defeat Lieberman's reelection campaign in 2012.

The group announced today that it has raised $1 million since Thursday.



Traitor Joe and Ben Nelson should go to work as a greeter duo at a Walmart somewhere.

AUDIO- Sen. Nelson: Health care bill 'isn't sufficient'. Psst! Neither is Sen. Nelson

By GottaLaff

http://a.abcnews.com/images/Primetime/ht_Chloe1_090716_ssv.jpg

Who's impeding the Senate bill? Senator Ben is impeding the Senate bill! Who's our little impeder? Who's our snooky wookums who's doing his bestest to stwip wepwoductive rights fwom women? Attaboy!

Looky there how BenBen continues to let Americans die by being an obstructionist and potentially encourages the deaths of distraught women who must make heartbreaking decisions!

Who's Big Insurance's wittle man? Who's Big Pharma's Big Boy?

Oh Ben? No cookie for you:
Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson told a Nebraska radio station Thursday that he will not vote for the Senate health care bill as it stands because of concerns over insurance coverage for abortions and other unresolved issues. [...]

"If it is not at the point that I think it needs to be with the improvements that I'm pushing, and they've made a lot of them, then I will not vote on cloture on the motion to end debate," Nelson told KLIN on Thursday.


Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Ben Nelson reviewing new abortion language

By GottaLaff

http://www.molecularstation.com/molecular-biology-images/data/504/Blastocyst.jpg

Abortion is legal. Making it even more difficult for those who have to make the gut-wrenching decision to get one is turning freedom of choice upside down.

Side effects of "new abortion language" include higher rates of death, higher health care costs, and emotional devastation.

But who cares about that as long as the blastocyst is happy:
Sen. Ben Nelson tells CNN he has received a compromise proposal on abortion restrictions that look "better than what's in the bill," but that he has to review it, and send it back to anti-abortion interest groups in his home state of Nebraska.
How about sending it to the pro-choice groups? And the pro-already alive and trying to get through an emotional trauma groups? And the pro-abiding by existing law groups?

But what do they know? They're not nearly as affected by Nelson's decision as a cluster of cells is.

Sunday, December 13, 2009

Health Care Now: Special Comment by my 72-year-old friend, Part 2

By GottaLaff

http://www.whatnowtoons.com/images/health-care-what-now-227_color.jpg

My very caring, impassioned 72-year-old Twitter pal, who goes by the name 42bkdodgr, would like to share his feelings about getting a decent Health Care Reform Bill passed, now. I am more than happy to oblige.

But first, a personal note from 42bkdodgr:
Many of you may wonder why I chose to use the “ 72 year old friend” as the introduction to my Special Comments. I selected the moniker so readers could see that from my age and life experiences I give a different perspective to the issues of today.
Now for his Special Comment:
This is the Moment

The Democrats have worked hard with the Republican members of the Senate and their own conservative members to try an reach an accord in drafting a HCR bill.

With recent comments made by Sen. Joe Liberman, Sen. Ben Nelson and Sen. Chuck Grassley, it has become more and more apparent to me, with each passing day, the Democrats will not get the 60 votes needed to pass a true HCR bill. I believe every Republican will vote against any HCR bill presented, nor will the Democrats get all their own members to vote in favor.

We know that when the Republicans are in power they pay little or no attention to the health care needs of the people. Look what they did in 2003: They passed an unfunded $400 billion dollar Medicare Drug bill that resulted in increasing the country’s deficit and cost senior citizens thousand of dollars.

Majority Leader Reid, the American people started out on this journey with you, as the song goes with “High Hopes”, and now you are at the point of another song titled “This is the Moment”. If real health care reform isn’t enacted now, it could be another 20 years before it is addressed again.

Bear in mind Sen. Reid, President Obama’s original goal was to have a strong public option, coverage for all Americans, ending rejection for pre-existing conditions, eliminating the donut hole gap in prescription drug coverage, prohibiting insurance companies from imposing annual and lifetime caps on benefit payments, and limiting premium discrimination based on gender and age.

So where are you, Senator Reid? Do you accept a whittled down HCR bill, or do the Democrats take the bull by the horns and use the Reconciliation procedure to pass a real medical reform bill? Let the Republicans scream and yell, they will do it anyway, no matter how you shape the bill.
Many thanks again for another pointed, relevant piece, 42bkdodgr. You never fail to say what so many of us are thinking and feeling, and your perspective is invaluable.

Part One here.

Spoil sports

By GottaLaff

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/assets_c/2009/08/Nelson-Lieberman-cqphotos-cropped-proto-custom_2.jpg

No matter what solutions the Democrats come up with, there will be the same old obstructionists giving them the same old thumbs down. They have no interest in moving the bill forward or providing life-saving options to ill and dying Americans. None. It's all about who shoves money into their pockets.

Time to tell them to take their donors and shove them:

Independent Joe Lieberman of Connecticut says opposition is growing to the Medicare buy-in. Lieberman says that he'd "have a hard time voting for it."

Democrat Ben Nelson of Nebraska says he fears the proposal could lead to single-payer government health care.

Let's hope Nelson is right.

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

BREAKING: Dems have FINAL deal to drop public option

By GottaLaff




UPDATE: PER KEITH, HARRY REID SAYS THEY HAVE A FINAL DEAL. SEE DETAILS BELOW, although none of these have been confirmed yet. (Please note, blog title edited to reflect this update)

Keith Olbermann just announced that Democratic Senators are saying they've reached a tentative deal to drop the public option.

The new darling of the debate is the Medicare buy-in proposal for those 55 and over.

UPDATE (liveblogging Keith):
Stupak (Nelson's was already given the thumbs down) Amendment wouldn't be part of a Senate plan, would never make it to Obama's desk.

Melissa Harris Lacewell's response:


(click to enlarge)

UPDATE, via Keith:
AP reporting that Medicare would be open to 55-year-olds and up, and it will be in the final bill.
And here is my e-mail alert from the L.A. Times:
Senators strike tentative deal to drop public option for health insurance

Democratic senators say they have a tentative deal to drop a government-run insurance option from healthcare legislation.

But liberals and moderates have been discussing an alternative, including a private insurance arrangement to be supervised by the federal agency that oversees the system through which lawmakers purchase coverage.

Additionally, talks centered on opening up Medicare to uninsured Americans beginning at age 55, a significant expansion of the large government health care program that currently serves the over-65 population.
UPDATE, per Keith:
Harry Reid says, "More choice for consumers, more competition for insurance companies."
Via Firedoglake (please go to their site for details) (h/t: smassing ):
For starters, the Medicaid expansion has completely been dropped, even though it would have been a big money saver for the government [...]

Now we are getting reports that the Medicare buy-in is not really a buy-in. . . or really Medicare. Senators are looking at restricting the Medicare buy-in so completely that it will be an option for almost no one. It will likely only be for a very tiny segment of poor and very unhealthy 55-64 year-olds [...]

Adding insult to injury, the “Medicare” this tiny fraction of people could buy in to might end up not even really being Medicare:

[Kent] Conrad said that he’d propose having the Medicare buy-in be treated as “a separate pool” that could have negotiated rates, rather than those set by the existing Medicare program. [...]

This very expensive non-Medicare that almost no one could buy in to might only be a temporary stopgap for just three years if a handful of conservatives get their way
Everything is still in flux, but this is not making many people happy. Understatement.

Senate rejects abortion amendment

By GottaLaff

http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/02T9c1I21G0r0/610x.jpg

I was watching this live. Senators Lieberman, Collins and Snowe voted to set aside the amendment:
The Senate narrowly rejected an amendment that would have restricted abortion coverage in the pending health-care bill, leaving in question whether Majority Leader Harry Reid (Nev.) has the 60 votes needed to move the bill toward final passage.

The measure, which failed 54-45, addressed the scope of restrictions on coverage of abortion services for people who receive subsidies to buy insurance. The outcome was expected, but could cost the support of Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.), who has threatened to filibuster the $848 billion bill unless abortion restrictions are tightened.

On to the next challenge...

Monday, December 7, 2009

VIDEO: Mikulski compares Nelson amendment to Nazi Germany and Communist China

By GottaLaff



I was gone when this part of the debate aired, and I've heard kudos to Senator Mikulski all over the place. This is the only clip I could find... for now.

Here's the loooong version from CSPAN. Mikulski is at about 455:00.

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Ben Nelson Floats Paying for Afghanistan War with War Bonds

By GottaLaff

http://i68.photobucket.com/albums/i27/chugroberts/Hobnob/ww1647-68.jpg

Buy bonds! With money you don't have! Even though it's for a war that has waning support! At best!
Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) today suggested the idea of selling war bonds to pay for sending troops to Afghanistan, reports CBS News Capitol Hill Producer John Nolen.

"Some people jumped right out and said you need a war tax, and I said wow, we didn't have a war tax in the Second World War," Nelson said. "The fact that we had bonds, war bonds, and people invested in their country in that fashion made a lot of sense back then. I don't know why it might not make sense today, certainly in lieu of jumping to tax."
Because World War II was "the good war" and the Afghan War is the sucky one? But his heart was in the right place, right?

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Ben Nelson threatens filibuster

By GottaLaff

http://features.csmonitor.com/politics/wp-content/assets/19/909/article_photo1.jpg

He and Joe the Traitor can go take a hike on the Appalachian Trail together:
Spokesman Jake Thompson elaborated a bit, "The abortion language, the public option and some other issues could be reason for him to vote no on cloture for final passage of a health care reform bill."
Dem v. Dem. Attaboy. Make it harder to survive in America.

H/t: Wolfrum

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Lieberman arm-twisting Ben Nelson to kill public option

By GottaLaff

http://i175.photobucket.com/albums/w122/wboxerw19/40794132.jpg
“MartyEisenstadt” poses for a photo with Sen. Joe Lieberman - moments before Lieberman and Blue Dog Dems invaded Sen. Ben Nelson’s office for some arm-twisting.

UPDATE: In comments, Eitan Gorlin just clarified:
In talking to Wolfrum, I may have gotten caught up in the excitement of my own speculation. The only thing I am sure of is "moderates" I mentioned met today in Nelson's office behind closed doors without staff or press.
Thank you, Eitan, much appreciated.

Original post
:

One of my Twitter buddies, Wolfrum, alerted me to a post of his about Traitor Joe's latest antics. Grab your Pepto and let's dive in:
This is a true story as related to me by Eitan Gorlin.

Martin Eisenstadt creators Eitan Gorlin and Dan Mirvish were in Washington D.C. today, tooling about Congress pressing the flesh to promote their new book [...]

Moments after the picture was taken, however, Gorlin informs me that Lieberman, along with Blue Dog Democrat Senators Mary Landreau and Blanche Lincoln and one Senator they couldn’t identify went into the office of fellow Blue Dog Ben Nelson, leaving the Eisenstadt duo behind. [...]

Gorlin:

It was obvious what was happening. Nelson is the swing vote on health care reform and everybody in Washington is talking about him.”[...]
You’re going to see Nelson come out against the health care reform bill, I’m sure of it,said Gorlin.

When will the Dems finally wake up and tell the Joe the Bummer that he's out as committee chairman? ... Followed by voters telling him he's out of career options.

Saturday, October 3, 2009

Sen. Ben Nelson: Public option shelved

By GottaLaff

http://www.omaha.com/apps/pbcsi.dll/bilde?Site=OW&Date=20091003&Category=NEWS01&ArtNo=710039914&Ref=AR&maxw=490&maxh=275

Here's an idea: Let's shelve most members of Congress:

The idea to allow the federal government to compete with private insurance companies via a so-called “public option” has been “shelved” in Congress, U.S. Sen. Ben Nelson said Friday. [...]

For the moment, the public option is shelved,” said Nelson, who gave an update on health-care reform to a group of Nebraska doctors in Omaha.

Nelson and Nebraska Gov. Dave Heineman spoke at a convention of the Nebraska Medical Association in downtown Omaha.

Heineman warned that a health care proposal wending its way through the Senate Finance Committee with Democratic support could prove expensive to states. A Republican, Heineman said the bill includes “millions” in unfunded mandates that would require Nebraska to either raise taxes or slash its budget.

“We'll only have two choices. You're going to get higher taxes or we're going to cut the budget,” Heineman said. “Plain and simple.”

Nelson, who is considered a pivotal vote in the Senate, said he would not support any bill until it was in its final form and he knew all of its particulars. [...]

Nelson said the cooperative idea is something he could support, although he made no commitment. Nelson's opposition to the public option was greeted warmly by many of the doctors in the room. Several said they questioned how the government could propose running a health care program, when it couldn't adequately fund Medicare, its current health care program for senior citizens. [...]

One doctor, however, did support the public option.

Dr. Victoria Maclin tried to persuade Nelson that a public option was needed to help cover the uninsured and the underinsured. “It's going to provide access to those people who can't afford insurance,” said Maclin, a fertility specialist in Omaha.

Nelson argued that a public option would be the beginning of the end of private insurance, as more and more people migrated to the cheaper government insurance plan.

And that would be bad because....?

Oh, and Ben, I guess you missed this poll.

Sunday, September 6, 2009

VIDEO: Sen. Ben Nelson Favors Public Plan ‘Trigger’

By GottaLaff



Expletives deleted.

Oh, and by the way, I'm currently disgusted enough to give a shout out to "Dean 2012":

"That's a terrible idea," former Gov. Howard Dean has previously said of Nelson's plan. Insurance companies "will just change their behavior until the trigger runs out and go back to how they were."
Paddy and I have been fuming all morning. And we have yet to be talked down.

Sunday, August 30, 2009

TeaDeather Watch: Helsinki Syndrome

By GottaLaff

http://www.helsinkisyndrome.org/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/webassets/Untitled-1.gif

I got an e-mail from my pal David Williams, a freelancer and regular contributor to the Omaha City Weekly... and it goes a little something like this:

Laffy, I appreciate the opportunity you’ve given me in reaching your readers. And even though I have now come to the sad realization (how dumb could I have been?) that you are a socialist bent on the enslavement of the American people, I like to think that you are a fair socialist bent on the enslavement of the American people; that you will continue to welcome my contributions even if they eminate from what I’m sure you will consider to be the dark underbelly of Nebraska.

And, please, don’t try to talk me down. My son has already done so. With breathless futility.

“You’ve allowed yourself to be seduced,” he said incredulously. “It can’t be! It’s like that…that…Helsinki Syndrome!”

Being only 29 and a product of the Hollywood Generation, he had confused the Stockholm Syndrome with its celluloid doppelganger – that memorable invention of Hans Gruber, the diabolically dapper international thief featured in a certain high-rise heist film of a bygone millennium.

Regardless of his errant phrasing, my son had accused his own father of having fallen prey to psychological bonding with one’s tormentors.

“You’ve been shadowing those tin foil hat Tea Baggers for so long that they’ve gotten into your head,” he cried.

“Nothing of the sort,” I explained. “I’m fine. You should have been there! It was just…just…”

The tipping point, my awakening, had come mere hours earlier when I had gone to cover a 9/12 Project protest at U.S. Senator Ben Nelson’s office here in Omaha, Nebraska. The crowd, if you could call it that, was rather anemic. Only 25 flag and sign-waving patriots were there an hour after the rally had begun, so I thought the best use of my time on a quiet Saturday afternoon under azure skies would be to pepper Nelson’s office with a few cogent questions.

Questions like how Nelson could stand idly by when one of his colleagues in the Cornhusker State delegation, House member Lee Terry, continues to yammer on about death panels.

And how he should consider pressuring the president to dump any hopes of bipartisanship with the birther-baiter-babbler wing of…well, you know.

Nelson’s office was less than talkative. No replies to my queries. None.

Then it hit me. For Nelson’s office to be so thoroughly unresponsive to his constituents, so utterly unwilling to engage in the public square (even if it was a parking lot) of political discourse…well…maybe…just maybe…the placard people had a point. Perhaps I should hear them out. I mean really listen to them this time.

And don’t even bother pointing out that Nelson’s office was closed today, as it is on every Saturday.

It doesn’t change the fact that his blinds were blind to the people. His desks, probably still hung over from a Friday night bender of pulling the plug on grandma and tipping over outhouses ripe with the now-dashed promise of the American Dream…were dismissive.

And his mums were mum.

Everybody knows that freedom-haters harbor a special affinity for mums. To paraphrase Raymond Chandler’s “The Big Sleep,” the intoxicating allure of the petulant perennial derives from its sweet stench of corruption and flesh like that of a harlot.

No, there’s no excuse for the silence of Nelson’s office today. I mean those people (rather we, for I am now a fellow traveler) put a lot of thought into this protest.

Helsinki Helschminki!

I thank David for the e-mail, for sharing his deepest darkest feelings with me, and for finally realizing that I am, indeed, a socialist commie Marxist, and even more so for appreciating my desire to enslave.

Why, as we speak, I've hired independent contractors from Xe and KBR to add on a dungeon to the Laffy residence. I've insisted it must be built to code, but you know how touchy they can be about things like wiring and such.

We're having some difficulty in choosing a color palette, though. What would you go with: Servitude Sienna or Bondage Burgundy?

Recent Posts