Showing posts with label sexist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label sexist. Show all posts

Saturday, October 31, 2009

"Right-wing women rock", lefties have "hairy legs"

By GottaLaff

A so-called columnist at the Calgary Sun has a remarkably sexist thing or two to say about right wing v. left wing women. I'd forgotten people like this existed in the 21st century:

The recent election of Danielle Smith as leader of the Wildrose Alliance reminded me that among the many things I love about the libertarian/right wing are the women.

Could be our slogan: Come for the culture war ... stay for the chicks.

Right-wing women rock.

"Stay for the chicks." No, that's not anachronistic at all. If this column isn't tongue-in-cheek, then Ian Robinson has RDD: Severe respect deficit disorder.

Not for us the sturdy, honest calves of the New Democrat/Green Party female, honed on eco-tourist rainforest hikes.

Those legs are often on unfortunate display, extending from a knee-length tweed skirt as hairy as the legs themselves, and end in a pair of Birkenstocks.

Apprently, all that excessive nose hair ego is interfering with what's left of his mind.

The only sensible footwear you'll find in a right-wing woman's closet are the Nike cross-trainers that go with her gym membership.

Everything else has a three-inch heel. Minimum.

What is up with conservatives and their fetishes? I wonder if Ian's into diapers, too.

Basically, the world economy depends on right-wing women buying shoes.
The world economy? Really? That's some mess-o'-new shoes! What are those high-heeled wingiewomen tromping around on, cut glass?

A right-wing woman wants to get elected, she runs for office.

If she wins, great. If she loses ... well, there's always more shoe shopping.

Campaign slogan: Elect right-wing women! They're not only losers, they're barefoot losers with way too much time on their hands!

A right-wing woman hits the gym, swings past Sobey's and has dinner on the table by the time you get home ... while her left-wing counterpart is still stuck in traffic listening to Sarah McLachlan on her iPod and feeling morally superior about her carrot choices.

And when that plate of food is put in front of you by the right-wing hottie you had the good sense to marry, it will be 100% tofu-free. If you're lucky, she just remembered to buy steak and forgot about the carrot entirely.

Spit take

There's a lot more, but let me leave you and your impending headache with this sagacious little nugget:

And in case you're not convinced, to indicate the utter superiority of the right-wing woman over the left-wing variant ... just turn on The View.

The left has Joy Behar and Whoopi Goldberg.

We've got Elisabeth Hasselbeck.

Checkmate.

So that's his idea of scoring a big win (odd juxtaposition of Hasselbeck and a game she'd mistake for a collection of salt and pepper shakers). He should stick to checkers.

H/t: Pete

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

Video- Contessa Brewer slams NRCC's Comments on Pelosi



Calls them as she sees them. "In her place" indeed. Imagine the kind of crap we'd be hearing if HRC had won.

Friday, July 3, 2009

Video- Limbaugh asserts "chicks ... have chickified the news"; again refers to female reporter as "infobabe"



I'm sure the women are just flocking to this hunka burning love, no way he'd ever have to pay for sex... in a foreign country... with chemical enhancers to raise his limp, lifeless...

Friday, May 29, 2009

Newt Gingrich blasts Sotomayor: "UnAmerican" !!!!!!!

By GottaLaff

http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:_ayAznXWf7N2BM:http://angrywhitedude.com/wp-content/uploads2/2008/12/newt1.jpg
Newtie, Newtie, don't you realize you're well on your way to becoming toast? I won't even go into his typos and overuse of !!!!!!!!s. I've edited this down... it was endless:
Renewing American Leadership, a 501(c)3 nonprofit that he heads, sent out an email to supporters calling on them to both "send blast faxes" to U.S. Senators demanding opposition to Sotomayor and contribute money to help the fight.

From the Desk of Newt Gingrich

"I have a dream: that my four little children will one day live
in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their
skin, but by the content of their character."

- Dr. Martin Luther King

Can you imagine if the President of the United States nominated a judge to the U.S. Supreme Court who said this:

"My experience as a white man will make me a better judge than a Latina woman would be."

Or could you imagine if that same judge ruled from the bench to deny 18 African-American firefighters a promotion just because of their skin color?

That judge would be called a bigot -- and in my judgment, rightly so! Would there be any doubt that he would be FORCED to WITHDRAW his nomination for the Supreme Court?

None.

There are only two options for how we govern ourselves – by laws, or by the will of those in power. The rule of law represents objective, dispassionate knowable standards that are applied and enforced equally to all citizens regardless of their background.

The will of those in power represents subjective, fleeting standards that are never fully known by any and are applied purely to satisfy the wishes of a small, concentrated group in power. [...]

President Obama should withdraw her nomination to the Supreme Court.

Consider what Judge Sotomayor said about how her being a Latina woman will affect her decisions as a judge:

"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."

You read that right -- Judge Sotomayor said that her experience as a person of a particular sex and ethnic background will make her a better judge than a person of another sex and a different ethnic background!

When did that view become acceptable?

If Civil War, suffrage, and Civil Rights are to mean anything, we cannot accept that conclusion. It is simply un-American. There is no room on the bench of the United States Supreme Court for this worldview. [...]

If President Obama will not withdraw his nomination, then the Senate has a duty to ensure that judges with who hold these beliefs are not confirmed to serve on the Supreme Court.

SEND BLAST FAXES TO EVERY U.S.
SENATOR, DEMANDING THEY REJECT
JUDICIAL ACTIVISTS LIKE SONIA SOTOMAYOR!
The United States is a nation of immigrants from many backgrounds and their contributions have made our country great but that was made possible because our nation was built upon a solid foundation of law and order. The rule of law should be non-negotiable. It cannot be subordinated to ethnic or racial biases. To do so would be to make our Constitution arbitrary and meaningless undermining the very foundations of our society.

The rule of law is a crucial safeguard for the preservation of freedom.

[...] Cases brought before the U.S. Supreme Court should be judged on the merits of the arguments rigorously tested against the United States Constitution. They should NOT be judged based on the racial and ethnic preferences of the judges making the decision!

Unfortunately, that's exactly what we'll get if Sonia Sotomayor is confirmed to the Supreme Court -- a judge who will interpret the law based on her ethnic background, rather than based on the LAW. [...]

Remember, this is the same woman who, when speaking at Duke Law School, made it clear that she believes it is a judge's role to "legislate from the bench": responding to a question on the pros and cons of different types of judicial clerkships, she stated that the court "is where policy is made!" She tried to correct her slip, by joking that "I know this is on tape and I should never say that, because we don't ‘make law,' I know, I know." But, she already made herself clear: She believes JUDGES MAKE LAW!

She is wrong. Lawmakers make law NOT judges.

Words mean things and her words give her away. No amount of explaining or spin can change what she truly believes and if she is confirmed she will bring those beliefs to the Supreme Court. [...]

The U.S. Supreme Court is no place for these kinds of judicial philosophies -- we need to STOP this nomination from going any further before it is too late!

SEND BLAST FAXES TO EVERY U.S.
SENATOR, DEMANDING THEY REJECT
JUDICIAL ACTIVISTS LIKE SONIA SOTOMAYOR!
Of course, no one believes that any judge can be 100% impartial and unbiased in every situation. Judges are human beings, and will occasionally allow their personal biases to cloud their attempts at impartiality.

But this is VERY different -- this judge is making it CLEAR that she thinks she SHOULD be biased and partial, based on her ethnicity and gender! [...]

When judges make decisions based not on the application of law but on their personal biases about an issue at hand, the independence and authority of the judiciary is compromised. [...]

Your background should NEVER impact the application of law under the U.S. Constitution. It should not be a consideration by the judge or an expected consideration by the judged. Decisions made by the highest court in the land should be made on the basis of what is right and wrong -- not who is right and who is wrong! [...]

We've set up a website where you can send "blast faxes" to EVERY SINGLE MEMBER OF THE SENATE, telling them to REJECT Sotomayor's nomination as the next U.S. Supreme Court Justice! For less that what it would cost you to gather every fax number and send all those faxes yourself, you can send SCORES of faxes, ALL AT ONCE to Capitol Hill -- to make SURE they hear your voice!

BUT... we have to act QUICKLY! Sotomayor's nomination will be debated very soon in the Senate Judiciary Committee! SEND YOUR FAXES NOW!

SEND BLAST FAXES TO EVERY U.S.
SENATOR, DEMANDING THEY REJECT

JUDICIAL ACTIVISTS LIKE SONIA SOTOMAYOR!
Your friend,

Newt Gingrich, former Speaker of the House
Renewing American Leadership

P.S. The Obama White House is already attacking me for pointing out the obvious: that Judge Sonia Sotomayor is unfit to serve on the Supreme Court. When he was specifically asked at the daily briefing to respond to my statements, spokesman Robert Gibbs gave a very ominous warning to anyone who dares to challenge this nomination:

"I think it is probably important for anyone involved in this debate to be exceedingly careful with the way in which they've decided to describe different aspects of this impending confirmation."

Well, I am not going to back down and neither should you. I see the damage that this nomination could do to our Constitution... and our country. We MUST stop Sotomayor's nomination to the Supreme Court -- or any OTHER nomination that threatens the Republic. Justice demands it!

SEND BLAST FAXES TO EVERY U.S.
SENATOR, DEMANDING THEY REJECT
JUDICIAL ACTIVISTS LIKE SONIA SOTOMAYOR!

We need YOUR help to take this fight to Capitol Hill. Please consider supporting Renewing American Leadership with a generous donation today. $25, $50, or $100 will dramatically help us stand strong for the Rule of Law in America!

PLEASE MAKE YOUR BEST
CONTRIBUTION NOW:
DONATE ONLINE!

I haven't seen so much racism, sexism, and hypocrisy since... since... 2001-2008. Poor wittle thing, big bad Robert Gibbs ATTACKED HIM!!!!! How unAmerican of Gibbs to challenge the latest Swiftboating campaign. What a racist, activist Press Secretary!!!!!!

By the way, Newtie, that rule of law you're so fond of referencing? It went out the window with John Yoo, Jay Bybee, and Stephen Bradbury. Maybe you should BLAST FAX THEM!!!! TOO!!!!! OKAY!!??!!

Thursday, November 13, 2008

VIDEO-- Dennis Miller says that "great dame" Palin is hated for having a "great sex life"

By GottaLaff


Dennis Miller's on a roll here. He humiliates himself on national television, again. With Billo, again. In a mere 46 seconds, he manages to reduce his already degraded image to that of a used gym towel. This irrelevant excuse for a talking head obviously has some unresolved personal issues.

I've got news for Formerly Funny Dennis: The last thing I consider upon being exposed to the stunted emotional development of Sarah Palin is what she does with Bobsled Todd in the little spare time they share behind closed doors:

She’s a great dame. People are fascinated by her because the Left hate her. I think the Left hate her — mostly women on the Left hate her — because to me from outside in it appears that she has a great sex life, all right? I think she has non-neurotic sex with that Todd Palin guy. … I think that snow mobile looks like mechanized foreplay to me and that’s why people are fascinated.
Hmmm. Shades of Rich Lowry. Stop your panting, Dennis. Your wife can smell your hot breath from across the room.

Recent Posts