By GottaLaff
Those wacky media types.
They just can't seem to get it right:Last night at a social event here in Washington, a national political reporter said that Palin had attracted huge crowds in the tens of thousands during the campaign. Other reporters nodded in agreement.
I spent a few days traveling with Palin last week. In a half-dozen stops, she never attracted a crowd in the tens-of thousands-category. At one rally in Florida, she didn’t even come close to filling the venue’s 5,333-person capacity. The crowds were boisterous, even raucous, but amounted to never more than a few thousand to 10,000 — max.
A recent Kimberly Strassel column in the Wall Street Journal similarly claimed a huge crowd at a Palin rally in Cape Girardeau, Mo., last week:
Wending my way through the traffic and crowds around the Palin event in this small river city on Thursday morning, I began to wonder if the whole state hadn’t shown up. Walking the cold half-hour from the nearest parking space, I passed mobs of disappointed voters who had already been turned away for lack of space. Inside the city’s Show Me Center, thousands of roaring, stomping, sign-waving Palin fans were practically hanging from the rafters. It felt like, well . . . an Obama rally.
I just checked the crowd count with the local paper. There were 7,000 people in attendance. Another 1,800 had been turned away at the door.
That is not even close to Sen. Barack Obama’s most recent rally in Missouri, where he attracted 100,000 people in St. Louis. Obama attracted 90,000 people at his final campaign rally in Manassas, Va.
Could Palin one day attract these kinds of crowds? Who knows. But for now, she doesn’t.
The overstatement of the numbers amounts to bad reporting and conveying subtle bias. If there is an obvious disregard for accuracy, then we need better journalists.
And yes, I realize I just stated the obvious.