By GottaLaff
Robert Gibbs is holding his daily briefing. Liveblogging:Obama envisioned: We are going to increase number of our forces in Afghanistan, more there sooner, staying longer in order to degrade Taliban, fight insurgency... while helping train Afghan army, police forces. July 2011 is when he believes we should begin transition. We're not gonna be there forever.
We'll provide them with the incentives they need to get their act together to train security force and army, and we can transfer responsibility to the Afghans.
Obama believes that this is best course forward.
Jake Tapper: Pressing about Rumsfeld 2001-2006, whether level of resourcing decisions, etc. were sufficient... Gibbs won't bite.
Gibbs: 9/11 brought us to Afghanistan.
Tapper: March speech, Obama said if Taliban returns it would be bad for women/girls. Didn't mention that last night.Gibbs: In context of 3 pillars, human rights is obviously part of what is happening, more broadly. That includes women/girls... nothing to read into here. Basic human rights of everyone would include that.
Q: Stability there in 2011, or is that less important?A: You can't have one w/o the other... Gates said he believed what we laid out was achievable... Part is to incentivize Afghans. We won't be there forever. Providing security will have to rest mainly with Afghan security forces. The team believes conditions will be met.
Q: So if they're not up to speed...? leave again?A: We're there to make sure it happens. We started w/ 32K military in Afghanistan in January. Then 68K by summer. By end of summer 2010, another 30K. Triple the resources in order to accelerate the training. Bench marks will be laid down to ensure on a frequent basis that we're achieving level of training necessary to do what plan envisions doing. Gates and others who testified today and others believe it's achievable.
Helen: Didn't mention pipeline in speech.A: Didn't come up in the 9 or 10 meetings. It's about Taliban, 9/11.
Helen: You gonna keep referring to 9/11?A: As Jake mentioned, in authorization to go in there was a result of 9/11, Afghan safe haven.
Helen: Isn't that an intervention? (I missed some, unintelligible)A: We're in Afghanistan. We hae a plan that incentivizes actions, whether training, improving governance... if those who are responsible are providing services that it needs, then we'll have a great rel'ship working with them. If not, we'll find people who will... because we'll have, by mid next year, more men and women... (Helen keeps pushing about whether they want us in)... They approve of us being there, quite clearly... but not forever.
Helen: Why do you have to demand of a sovereign country what they do?A: There's congressional authorization. If you ask if they want us there, they say yes. But not a permanent dependence on us being there. Incentivize, training, blahblah... meet needs of people... security force to prevent Taliban overthrow or safe haven for Al Qaeda to prevent attack on us.
Chip Reid: Majority doesn't support sending troops.A: What poll are you...? Well, he didn't make a national security decision based on polling. Obama believes the decision is the right one and he'd like to tell America why he thinks it's right. It's not a one shot deal... any one of your news orgs will poll reactions to speech, etc. This isn't a one shot deal.
Chip: But over coming months, if polls still low...?A: We didn't make decision based on polls, and won't in future. If we looked at polls before decisions, the financial system would have suffered collapse... There's be one domestic auto company.. maybe we would have pulled out of Afghanistan. He didn't believe in our system collapsing....
And now both CNN and MSNBC cut away...