Showing posts with label confirmation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label confirmation. Show all posts

Sunday, April 11, 2010

Pat Leahy: New Justice to Be Confirmed by August

By GottaLaff

Is this anything like health care reform legislation being completed by summer, er, fall, er, before Christmas, er, in March?

I'm sure we're all looking forward to the kindly old white Congress-gentlemen on the right side of the aisle reaching out to their brethren in a grand gesture of bipartisanship, coming together as one to confirm their president's Supreme Court nominee:

The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee predicted Sunday that a new Supreme Court justice would be confirmed before Senators leave town for the August recess.

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Jacqueline H. Nguyen as U.S. District Judge: Confirmed 97-0.

By GottaLaff

A little about her from the White House web site:

Judge Jacqueline H. Nguyen: Nominee for the Central District of California

Judge Jacqueline Nguyen is currently a Superior Court Judge for the County of Los Angeles, a position to which she was appointed in August 2002. Judge Nguyen received her undergraduate degree from Occidental College in 1987 and her law degree from the University of California at Los Angeles in 1991. From 1991 to 1995, Nguyen worked in private practice where she specialized in civil litigation. From 1995 until August 2002, Nguyen was an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Central District of California. During her tenure in that office, she served as Deputy Chief of the General Crimes Section. Judge Nguyen is being nominated to the United States District Court for the Central District of California and was rated well-qualified by the ABA.

Voting details here.

(click on image to enlarge)

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Senate confirms Judge David Hamilton 59-39

By GottaLaff

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/2009-03-19-obstructionist.jpg

About time!

The Senate confirmed Judge David Hamilton to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals 59-39 Thursday after breaking a GOP filibuster Tuesday and a five-and-a-half month delay.

Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.), who represents Hamilton's home state of Indiana, casted the lone Republican vote for the judge.

This obstructionism by the Rushpublic party not only got in the way of the vote, it got in the way of something much bigger: democracy.

This gumming up the works has gotten out of hand, and it is further destroying the GOP. On the bright side, who needs opposition research when they do such a good job destroying their own credibility?

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Senate Democrats break GOP judicial filibuster


It kills me how much of a moderate Judge Hamilton is. I can't imagine the hoopla that would have happened if the President had, ::gasp:: , nominated a liberal.

Washington (CNN) - Senate Democrats broke a GOP filibuster Tuesday against a district judge first nominated eight months ago by President Barack Obama for a seat on the federal appeals court.

The Senate voted 70-29 to end debate over the nomination of Indiana Judge David Hamilton, who was tapped by Obama in March to fill a vacancy on the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Hamilton was Obama's first judicial nominee.

The full Senate is now expected to move forward quickly on a final vote on the nomination.

Hamilton's nomination cleared the Senate Judiciary Committee in June. Leading Republicans, however, then spent weeks preventing a final vote, arguing that Hamilton is too liberal.

Sunday, August 2, 2009

John McCain undecided on vote for Sotomayor

By GottaLaff



I'm "saddened" that J Sid is still undecided. Could it be he was influenced by all those "vicious attacks" on Judge Sotomayor that he disdains so much when they're directed at Sarah the Quitter?
Sen. John McCain says he is still on the fence when it comes to voting for Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor.

McCain says he is examining Sotomayor's record as an appeals court judge to decide whether she understands the limits to judicial power. He voted against her when she was nominated to the appeals court. [...]

The Arizona Republican says the prospect of Sotomayor becoming the first Hispanic on the high court is part of the discussion, and calls her a great American success story.

I see. But whether he'll further her great American success is a different question entirely. By the way, if he votes for her in part because she would be the first Hispanic SC Justice, isn't that edging into affirmative action territory?

Saturday, August 1, 2009

In case of NRA v. Sotomayor: Sotomayor wins

By GottaLaff

The National Rifle Association's threat to punish senators who vote for Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor has been met with a shrug by Democrats from conservative-leaning states and some Republicans who are breaking with their party to support her.

The gun rights group is used to getting its way by spooking lawmakers about the political consequences of defying its wishes. But it never before has weighed in on a Supreme Court confirmation battle. It was cautious about breaking that pattern, and it looks like a losing a fight to defeat President Barack Obama's first pick for the court.

Sotomayor is expected to easily win confirmation in a vote this coming week that could deflate the long-accepted truism in Washington that you don't cross the NRA.

More here.

Fat guy shooting his gun

Thursday, July 30, 2009

Sotomayor votes, to date: 35-23

By GottaLaff

Here's the latest tally to keep you busy while I catch up with today's newsiness:

The latest C-SPAN tally in advance of the coming Senate vote on Judge Sonia Sotomayor's nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court shows 35 senators in favor -- including 29 Democrats and 6 Republicans -- with 23 senators opposed.

There are still 42 senators who are uncommitted.
42 uncommitted, huh? I know of a few senators who should have been committed years ago.

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

BREAKING: Senate Judiciary Committee approves Judge Sotomayor

By GottaLaff

Just a few minutes ago, Sotomayor was approved by a vote of 13-6:

The Senate Judiciary Committee this morning endorsed Sonia Sotomayor to become an associate justice of the Supreme Court on a largely partisan vote that sends her historic nomination to the full Senate for a final decision on her confirmation.

The 13 to 6 vote came nearly two weeks after the committee's members grilled Sotomayor for 2 ½ days, eliciting answers that betrayed little indication of how the nominee, an appellate judge for the past 11 years, would rule on the most significant issues that come before the nation's highest court.

Sotomayor is President Obama's first nominee to the Supreme Court and would become the court's first Hispanic and its third female member. In choosing her in May, the president emphasized her Horatio Alger-like life story, rising from a poor childhood with a widowed mother in a Bronx housing project to attend two Ivy League universities, eventually becoming a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit.

A spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said today that the full Senate probably will not begin debate on Sotomayor's confirmation until next week, although the specific schedule has not been determined. [...]

Graham, the only Republican to join Democrats in voting to send Sotomayor's nomination to the full Senate, said, "I would not have chosen her, but I understand why President Obama did." Graham called her "left of center but certainly within the mainstream. . . She can be no worse than Souter from our point of view," he said, referring to conservatives' view of David H. Souter, the retiring court member she would replace, who was appointed by a Republican president, George H.W. Bush.

Graham said his decision to support her was motivated, in part, by an effort to end the partisan fighting that has characterized some judicial nominations in recent years, when Senate Democrats filibustered several of President George W. Bush's most controversial candidates for lower federal courts. "We came perilously close to damaging an institution of the judiciary that has held this country together in different times."

"The filibusters that were going on a few years ago were historic in nature," Graham said, predicting that their continuation would "over time drive good men and woman away from wanting to be judges," rendering the judicial branch "just an extension of politics in another form."

The law, Graham said, "should be a quiet place, where even the most unpopular could have a shot. No way you can win an election but in the court you might have a shot." He also said that Sotomayor was qualified to serve on the Supreme court and said that, if, as the first Latina member, she "will inspire young women, particularly Latina women, to seek a career in the law, that would be a good thing." [...]

Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wisc.) said, "These hearings have come little more than theater."

Thursday, June 25, 2009

Harold Koh confirmed to State Department legal post

By GottaLaff

Took long enough:

After months of GOP stalling tactics and conservative fearmongering, Yale Law School Dean Harold Koh was confirmed by the Senate today to be the State Department’s top legal adviser. He passed by a vote of 62-35, with five Republicans voting to confirm — Sens. Olympia Snowe (ME), Susan Collins (ME), Richard Lugar (IN), Mel Martinez (FL), and George Voinovich (OH).

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Republicans Will Not Fight Over Sotomayor

By GottaLaff

http://www.alchemysite.com/blog/GOP_cliff_angle_08.jpg
Rushpublics won't fight over Sotomayor? Why not? They fight over everything else:
Top Senate Republican strategists tell Politico that, "barring unknown facts about Judge Sonia Sotomayor, the GOP plans no scorched-earth opposition to her confirmation as a Supreme Court justice."

Not a single senator has come out publicly in opposition to Sotomayor's confirmation.

Said one GOP aide: "The sentiment is overwhelming that the Senate should do due diligence but should not make a mountain out of a molehill. If there's no 'there' there, we shouldn't try to create one."
1. They finally figured out that their party would effectively come to a screeching halt if they oppose her (well, a more abrupt screeching halt... it's not exactly thriving as it is). And...

2. They've made creating a "there" where there is none, into an art form. That statement is well on its way to becoming obsolete.

Insider Tips for a Smooth Confirmation Process by Former Reagan Chief of Staff

By GottaLaff

http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/images/2009/05/26/image5039543x.jpg
Future Supreme Court Judge Sotomayor, are you paying attention? A former Reaganite is giving out free pointers:
Former Reagan Chief of Staff Ken Duberstein -- who also guided Justices William Kennedy, David Souter, and Clarence Thomas through their Senate confirmation process -- shares 10 secrets for a smooth trip to the High Court.
  • Personal stories are compelling every time.
  • Begin your senatorial courtesy calls almost immediately.
  • Practice, practice, practice.
  • Be prepared for the kitchen sink at the hearings.
  • The Constitution stops at the foot of Capitol Hill.
  • Tell the truth, always.
  • Senators welcome mea culpas in your oral testimony.
  • Pause for seven seconds before you answer any question.
  • Have an answer for the one question you didn't want to be asked -- because you will undoubtedly be asked that question.
  • Senators usually depart when the cameras are turned off, but remember: The microphone will still be on.
He adds a bonus: "You have the best lobbyist in the world at your disposal... the president of the United States, and a popular one at that. Use the president's influence judiciously -- but use it."
She already has the hang of most of these tips. I have a feeling she'll sail through the Q & A with relatively few glitches.

The Rushpublics, on the other hand, may want to use that 7 second rule before they open their yaps. Come to think of it, they may want to take a good hard look at most of the above suggestions.

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Conservatives Set To Block Dawn Johnsen’s Nomination

By GottaLaff

In a couple of recent posts, I've brought up Dawn Johnsen as someone who should get confirmed without any further delay. Didn't we just know that the Rushpublics would do their level best to block her? Why would they do that? This is why. It's not about her position on abortion, it's about her (perfectly appropriate) approach to justice and our legal system, meaning: They're terrified.

Well, well, well, guess which unsurprising move by the Rushpublics is about to cut the Democrats off at the knees:

Roll Call reports that conservatives look poised to successfully block the nomination of Dawn Johnsen to head the White House Office of Legal Counsel (OLC). Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) declared that his hands were tied without the assistance of a few Republican votes:

“Right now we’re finding out when to do that,” Reid said, responding to a question about the status of Indiana University law professor Dawn Johnsen’s nomination to the Justice post. “We need a couple Republican votes until we can get to 60.”

Three words: Senator Al Franken.

It’s unclear why 60 votes are needed to confirm Johnsen, considering her predecessor, Jay Bybee — who went on to authorize illegal torture — won easy confirmation in 2001 through a simple voice vote. Bybee’s successor, Jack Goldsmith, was also approved by a voice vote. Steven Bradbury served for three years as an acting OLC head, and so did not have to come up for a vote. Having a full — and filibuster-proof — Senate vote on Johnsen would be an unusual break with recent precedent. [...]

Johnsen is eminently qualified to head the OLC. She has been an outspoken critic of Bush’s torture and eavesdropping programs, argues persuasively for accountability for wrongdoing, and has written passionately in support of checks and balances and against executive branch power grabs. She is a strong progressive candidate who could restore the tainted OLC to a place of legal professionalism and pride. And, like the majority of Americans, Johnsen thinks abortions should be safe and legal in most cases.

Specter and Nelson can find little in Johnsen’s sterling record to substantively critique, and Reid shouldn’t let them stand in the way. Indeed, their opposition to her breaks their track record for supporting previous OLC heads like Bybee. Remember, when Bush nominated Bybee for a federal judgeship, Specter, Nelson, Cornyn, and Reid all voted to confirm him.

It's time for Paddy and me to invite Specter and Nelson to join Lindsey Graham in the woodshed. I'll supply the spiders.

H/t: Dr. President

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Kathleen Sebelius confirmed as HHS Secretary


Announced just now on The Ed Show- more as I get it.

UPDATE-

WASHINGTON - Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius won Senate confirmation Tuesday to serve as the nation's health and human services secretary.

She already has a public health emergency on her hands with the swine flu sickening dozens of Americans.

The 65-31 vote came after Democrats urged quick action so that Sebelius could get to work leading the federal response to the flu outbreak. Sixty votes in the 100-seat Senate were necessary for approval.


That's a better margin than I expected.

Monday, April 20, 2009

3 nominees confirmed for Justice posts + Chris Hill news

By GottaLaff

Moving right along:

Lanny Breuer, pitcher Roger Clemens' lawyer in a steroid investigation and President Bill Clinton's impeachment attorney, was confirmed by the Senate on Monday as chief of the Justice Department's criminal division.

Senators also confirmed Tony West, a lawyer for "American Taliban" John Walker Lindh, to lead the department's civil division and Christine Varney to head the antitrust division.

Breuer was confirmed by a vote of 88-0, Varney by 87-1 and West, 82-4.

The Senate also voted 73-17 to end a filibuster — and allow a vote this week — on the nomination of Christopher Hill to be ambassador to Iraq. Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., was critical of Hill's performance when the diplomat was the Bush administration's top negotiator with North Korea.

Justice Department officials said Breuer will remove himself from the Clemens investigation.

Follow the link for more details.

Thursday, March 5, 2009

Senate Republicans playing games with our lives

By GottaLaff

Via TPM:

The senate Republicans are refusing to give a vote to two of President Obama's key (hopefully soon to be) economic advisors -- Austan Goolsbee and Cecilia Rouse. So for the moment they're barred from advising the president at all. The Republicans seem pretty candid about the fact that this is pay back for stuff that happened back in the Bush era. But aren't we in the throes of a catastrophic economic crisis?
These are the politicians who the Rushpublics trust to represent them? They just proved they don't care one iota about their country or the people who voted for them.

They don't care that Americans are in dire straits, starving, without health care, losing their homes, feeling the world crashing down around them.

All they care about is political game-playing.

They belong in the dumpster along with their abysmal poll numbers.

Recent Posts