Showing posts with label we lerve Rachel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label we lerve Rachel. Show all posts

Monday, October 12, 2009

Rachel Maddow has become the best talkshow host in America

By GottaLaff

http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2009/10/09/maddow460x276.jpg
Photograph: Virginia Sherwood/NBC

UPDATE: August '09 Ratings: MSNBC Down, But Maddow Up (h/t: Shoq)

As if we didn't know:

Rachel Maddow first came on my radar in the spring of 2004, when she, along with Lizz Winstead and Chuck D of Public Enemy hosted an early morning radio show called Unfiltered on the newly minted Air America, an attempt to counter rightwing talk radio with liberal programming.

[...] I wanted other people to learn about this Maddow character, who brought to every episode a dynamic mix of sparkling good humour, intelligent analysis and a broad view of what issues should matter.

Unfiltered didn't make the first round of reshuffling at Air America, but Maddow hung in, hosting her own eponymous radio show and eventually moving to television, first as a guest pundit and now as a host of her own night time political talkshow on MSNBC. [...]

It was mostly hard to imagine a cable news network rewarding a pundit for being sober-minded and nuanced in her analysis, as well as suspicion that homophobia would prevent it from promoting a lesbian who favours a more masculine way of dressing.

But 2008 was a year for re-arranging American expectations about who gets to have a voice in public. [...] In a very short period of time, the unthinkable became the reality, and Maddow had her very own MSNBC programme.

Maddow's audience is still small, but she inspires devotion in her fans, because she doesn't fit the tedious mould of most political talkshow hosts. Maddow openly identifies with the wild world of the liberal blogosphere, and even went so far as to wear pajamas on her show to cheekily demonstrate solidarity with bloggers after Palin denounced the netroots.

Like bloggers, Maddow knows that the key to building rapport with your audience isn't making yourself into an aloof portrayal of authority, but to show your human side and sense of humour. To this end, Maddow lets her idiosyncrasies become known, such as her obsession with classic cocktails.

But what really endears her to American liberals is the way she takes her job and the authority it gives her seriously. Maddow is less interested in the shouting fests that dominate most cable news and instead favours in-depth interviews with experts who are permitted to show their expertise on air without being interrupted. Hers may be the only show on cable news were feminists come on air to speak their minds without being paired off with belligerent sexists who dominate the conversation by yelling over their points.

Stop. That last part deserves some applause.

http://manmadequilts.com/A101.gif

Okay, good, thank you. Moving on:

But Maddow isn't opposed to fair-mindedness. She often brings on conservatives for the same kind of in-depth interviews, and even when she strongly disagrees, she always gives them a chance to air their views (and generally hang themselves with those views). Her show is the exact opposite of Bill O'Reilly's show. Where he cuts people off for saying things he doesn't like, Maddo

Stop again. Sorry. I can't help myself.

Alrighty. Here we go:

She also gives far more coverage to issues other hosts avoid because they're big downers. Maddow is the only reliable source of televised information on the growing problem of domestic terrorism in the US, and the only mainstream pundit to pay attention to the network of anti-abortion activists that quietly support the few that work up the courage to shoot doctors or bomb clinics. She doesn't treat the rapid growth of the extreme right in America like it's a joke or a minimal issue, as do other hosts, but as a serious threat to our democracy.

Damn. Here comes the dreaded BUT:

BUT

It seems that now, most liberals have turned off their TVs and returned to getting most information from the internet, and Maddow's ratings have plummeted as a result. [...]

Hopefully, the next round of US elections will push her ratings back up again, because we can't afford to lose the sole voice of intellectual liberalism in the cable news desert.

The dumbing down of America is kicking in big time. Shame on us.

H/t: Ellen

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Wish Rachel Maddow a Happy 36th Birthday!

By GottaLaff

Here's a short video from that series I posted about the other day. This one is about blogging and Tweeting:



(via)

Happy birthday, Rachel!

http://images.huffingtonpost.com/gen/72182/thumbs/s-MADDOW-BIRTHDAY-large.jpg

Today, your new favorite cable news host turns 36 — she was born on April 1, 1973.

Send Rachel your birthday message — or relive your favorite Maddow moments — in the comments below, and we'll make sure to pass them on.
I left a comment on behalf of TPC, but don't let that stop you. Go ahead... leave a comment here.

Saturday, February 14, 2009

Rachitude

By GottaLaff



—Photo: Ashton Worthington
Nobody needs to talk us down from this:

Mother Jones: You're TV's "It Girl." Why did your popularity take off so explosively?

Rachel Maddow: Two things happened. One, I opened up an umbrella factory at the start of monsoon season. The other thing was that Keith Olbermann's ratings are off the charts, so I have the best lead-in in cable news. I just hit the contextual lottery.

MJ: You've risen to fame critiquing the Bush administration. Will your show change without that foil?

RM: As if Fox News did really poorly with Bush in the White House? [...]

MJ: You're representing on a lot of different fronts: women, youngish people, gays and lesbians, lefties, Oxford PhDs, comic book enthusiasts...

RM: People who aren't conventionally attractive or a size zero, people with unruly hair. [...]

MJ: Speaking of mirrors, you changed your look a lot for TV. How was that handled?

RM: It wasn't at anybody else's encouraging. I wanted my appearance to not be the only thing people would pay attention to. So essentially I was seeking genericness.

MJ: Will women eventually be able to host a show and wear glasses?

RM: I'm not sure msnbc would stop me from wearing my glasses now if I wanted to. The problem is technical, in that the frames are cheap plastic and they reflect. [...]

MJ: Still, it's nice that you have a hipster sensibility. There's something so homogenized about the news on every level.

RM: Working in news is a homogenizing lifestyle—that's part of the problem. People say, "You seem too normal." Well, yeah, I've been in this industry for six weeks. Wait until I've been working 14-hour days and having no outside life for five years. [...]

MJ: But as the first lesbian talk-show news host...I don't know what title you'd use...

RM: It's a very small glass ceiling I've broken. [...] I'm in favor of outing when people have demonized or scapegoated gay people for their own public gain. I don't think just being a Republican is reason enough.

MJ: You've been an activist. Is being a journalist influenced by progressive values the same thing?

RM: No. Activism is setting a goal of something you would like to be different, and figuring out what would have to change to achieve that goal. [...] The only thing I'm trying to change in the world is to increase the amount of useful information in it. And entertainment, honestly.

MJ: Speak of your love of Pat Buchanan.

RM: Aww. Pat is a good debater, and I love that, and he has strong beliefs. He listens to people who disagree with him and he's not condescending. [...] And he knows a lot. You want to talk Watergate? He was there. You want to talk culture war? That was him. Southern strategy, comma, Buchanan. [...]

MJ: You're writing a book about the influence of politics on the US Military. How is it changing?

RM: My central thesis is that we need more politics in the military. This idea of "the foreign policy consensus" gave Congress an excuse to be hands-off about deploying armed forces for reasons that never got debated and were often scandalous when they came to light. The number of Iraq veterans who ran for Congress this year? Holy shit. To have the Democratic Party become the party of the veterans? There's a realignment happening at the urging of members of the military who are sick of being used.

MJ: Olbermann just renegotiated his contract for a reported $7.5 million a year. When do you get to renegotiate?

RM: For $7.5 million? Ha! It remains to be seen whether I'm a flash in the pan.

Go read the whole thing. It's Rachelicious.

Sunday, November 23, 2008

VIDEO: Rachel Maddow on "Conan O'Brien"

By GottaLaff


From November 21, 2008

"My brother and I used to play 'Iran'... and fight over who got to be the Shah... I was like, seven."
Seven was also the age at which she decided she hated Ronald Reagan. Here's my fave:
"People write in to tell me that I'm gay... as if I didn't know."

Saturday, November 22, 2008

Little known facts about Rachel Maddow

By GottaLaff


Newsweek has a long piece all about our Rachel, way too much to summarize. Here are a few fun facts, but for substance, go here:
  • Rachel Maddow is six feet tall.
  • She is "knock on wood" superstitious.
  • She is anxious, often lying awake worrying about America's need for improved infrastructure and national security.
  • She often has just one large meal at 2 a.m., purchased from street vendors.
  • She comes in every day and studies for eight hours.
  • She has suffered from cyclical depression since puberty that, she says, you can set your watch by.
  • At her lowest points, she loses her sense of smell.
  • At seven years old, she hated Ronald Reagan.
  • She wanted to be an Olympic athlete until a serious injury dashed her hopes.
  • Her 10-year partner, Susan Mikula, is 50.
She is one interesting, accomplished, smart woman.

I found an old photo of Rachel and Susan.
Not the most flattering, but one of the few I could dig up.

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

VIDEO-- Rachel Maddow: What's wrong with pajamas?

By GottaLaff


Comedy Binky Barbie is blaming bloggers for her bad press now. Surprise! I'll have you know, I don't have a basement, although I believe CBB may have been projecting just a tad since that's where her poll numbers are.

I'll have you know I, as an evil blogger, will gladly take responsibility for the downfall of CBB. And I'll have you know, we bloggers lerve Rachel even more after seeing this:


For the record, I don't wear jammies when I post. I reserve them for when I dine out.

Recent Posts