By GottaLaff
If these organizations aren't up for a good fight, then fuggetaboutit:
This was a very extensive piece. Please go read the whole thing.To their credit, NARAL and Planned Parenthood are have already shown their willingness to do what's necessary to win this next round. They have threatened to withhold funding from Ciro Rodriguez and Harry Teague, the two members of Congress who got money from the groups in the last election cycle and proceeded to vote for Stupak anyway. And Planned Parenthood has announced its intentions to pull its support from any reform bill that includes Stupak.
There's more hardball to be played. These groups, along with the prochoice PAC EMILY's List, could announce that they'll "score" a vote for a healthcare bill that contains abortion restrictions like the Stupak amendment as an antichoice vote, for instance. That's important because these lobbying organizations use their scores to determine which legislators gets their money--and how much. (Planned Parenthood and NARAL have not yet decided how to score votes on health reform bills that contain antiabortion provisions, though NARAL's policy director, Donna Crane said, "That's a very serious question being discussed in our organization." EMILY's List has not returned calls.)
We have to be as tough as nails on this, consistent, persistent, clear, and unified.
In fact, check out how hard core in-your-face Chris Matthews was on this subject on today's Hardball. He was debating Rev. Thomas Tobin, Bishop of Providence, Rhode Island about banning Patrick Kennedy from Holy Communion for his views, among other things:
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy