Showing posts with label balance of power. Show all posts
Showing posts with label balance of power. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Obama Scales Back Executive Power

By GottaLaff

"On the campaign trail, Barack Obama swore he wouldn't be another president who grabs power for himself and resists oversight from Congress and the courts," CQ Politics reports.

And "some of the first steps Obama has taken as president, along with several of his early appointments, suggest that he actually is rejecting some of Bush's most expansive executive power claims, experts say, particularly on national security and secrecy."
Now, how about those renditions, wiretaps, and Bush Crime Family members?

Thursday, July 31, 2008

Judge Rules White House Aides Can Be Subpoenaed

By GottaLaff


Just throw the key away, already:
President Bush's top advisers are not immune from congressional subpoenas, a federal judge ruled Thursday in an unprecedented dispute between the two political branches.

House Democrats called the ruling a ringing endorsement of the principle that nobody is above the law. They swiftly announced that the Bush officials who have defied their subpoenas, including Bush's former top adviser Karl Rove, must appear as part of a probe of whether the White House directed the firings of nine federal prosecutors. Democrats announced plans to open hearings at the height of election season.

The Bush administration was expected to appeal. [...]

The ruling is a blow to the Bush administration's efforts to bolster the power of the executive branch at the expense of the legislative branch. Disputes over congressional subpoenas are normally resolved through political compromise, not through the court system. Had Bush prevailed, it would have dramatically weakened congressional authority in oversight investigations. [...]

Bates, who was appointed to the bench by Bush, issued a 93-page opinion that strongly rejected the administration's legal arguments. He noted that the executive branch could not point to a single case in which courts held that White House aides were immune from congressional subpoenas.

''That simple yet critical fact bears repeating: the asserted absolute immunity claim here is entirely unsupported by existing case law,'' Bates wrote.

BushCo will drag this out as long as they can.

Recent Posts