Thursday, June 12, 2008

Rezko: Feds pushed for dirt on Obama

By GottaLaff

Shades of Susan McDougal? And I am not equating McDougal with Rezko, I am seeing a parallel between the pressures on both of them to turn against major political figures:

Imprisoned Chicago businessmanAntoin “Tony” Rezko has accused federal prosecutors of improperly pressuring him to implicate Barack Obama in a corruption case.

In a letter to the U.S. District judge who presided over his trial, Rezko, who was convicted this month of 16 corruption-related counts, including fraud and money laundering, called prosecutors “overzealous.” And he singled out what he said were their efforts to get him to turn on Obama, an Illinois senator and the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, and Illinois Gov. Rod Bagojevich.

They are pressuring me to tell them the ‘wrong’ things that I supposedly know about Gov. Bagojevich and Sen. Obama,” Rezko wrote in an undated letter released by the court this week. “I have never been party to any wrongdoing that involved the governor or the senator. I will never fabricate lies about anyone else for selfish purposes. I will take what comes my way, but I will never hurt innocent people.”

Randall Samborn, a spokesman for the U.S. attorney’s office in Chicago, wouldn't comment on Rezko's allegation.
See what I mean? Kinda makes you nostalgic for Ken Starr, doesn't it? Me neither.
But its allegations about pressure to implicate Obama will surely give ammunition to partisans on both sides.

For Democrats, Rezko’s claim dovetails with allegations that the Department of Justice targeted high-profile Democrats.

For Republicans, it will be used to suggest Obama’s relationship with Rezko drew warranted federal scrutiny.
The DoJ would never play politics when it comes to justice! Why ::sputter, sputter:: that would be politicizing our legal system! By the way:
Though Obama was not implicated in any wrongdoing in the Rezko case, his name was mentioned sporadically during Rezko’s trial.
Its a given, when someone mentions a Democrat in a trial, it means the Democrat is automatically guilty of something. Ask any Republican.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Recent Posts