By GottaLaff
Do you hear that sound? It's the chip-chip-chipping away at Roe v. Wade. Legal abortions are less accessible, physicians who perform them are being assassinated, and restrictions on women who might need one are getting tighter.
This must be the liberty conservatives rave about so often. That whole "coming between you and your doctor" thing? Yeah, it is not the progressives who condone that:
LINCOLN, Neb.—Nebraska lawmakers on Monday gave final approval to a first-of-its-kind measure requiring women to be screened for possible mental and physical problems before having abortions. [...]
It's also likely be challenged in court. National abortion-rights supporters have called it a drastic shift in abortion policy that would block abortions by scaring doctors who might perform them.
Doctors would be required to screen women to find out if they were pressured into having abortions. Then they could determine whether someone is likely to end up with mental or physical problems after the procedure.
That's awfully subjective, and it occurs to me that a woman would feel pressured by the question about feeling pressured. Could this be the birth (no pun) of "pressure panels"?
The patients would have to be told whether they are at risk, but would still be allowed to have an abortion.
If I were told I were at risk, that would stress me out enough to be diagnosed as being stressed out, but I wouldn't necessarily be able to identify the source of my stress. Especially if I were a very young woman, as in teenager.
And after having worked with teens for years, I can safely say that they feel pressured if you so much look at them wrong.
Or if you tell them you're about to look at them wrong.
Or if you ask them if they feel pressured.
If a screening was not done, a woman could file a civil suit.
Doctors would not face criminal charges, nor would they lose their medical licenses.
So what's the problem?
"It's too vague," said Sen. Brad Ashford of Omaha, one of just nine senators who voted against the measure on Monday. "I don't know if a physician faced with civil action can know all the risk factors," cited in journals, he added.
Chip, chip, chip....