Showing posts with label race. Show all posts
Showing posts with label race. Show all posts

Saturday, March 20, 2010

Black support for Obama's race-neutral stance is high


I've often wondered about his thinking on all this. Guess he's doing it right.

CHARLOTTE, N.C. - Discontent is surging among some black advocates over President Barack Obama's refusal to target rising black unemployment, but many black residents in Charlotte, N.C., say they support his racially neutral approach to joblessness.

(snip)

African-Americans interviewed last week by The Associated Press say the president is correct to focus on the needs of all Americans, and black people should take responsibility for solving their own problems.

They include Shenika Simpson, an unemployed single mother. Simpson says Obama "can't just jump in the chair and fix everything within a year."

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

More Americans call selves multiracial


Someone make sure that Buchanan and Tancredo have their "nerve pills" on them, ready to go.

WASHINGTON, March 3 (UPI) -- The number of U.S. residents classifying themselves multiracial in the U.S. Census is expected to climb, officials say.

The 2010 census forms go to 135 million households at a time when the country has grown more ethnically and racially diverse because of immigration and a growing number of interracial marriages, USA Today reported Wednesday.

(snip)

The Census Bureau first allowed people to choose more than one race in the 2000 census, and this year's census will enable some of those who were children identified as one race by parents to choose more than one now that they're adults.

The bureau predicts by 2050, there will be no racial or ethnic majority as the proportion of non-Hispanic whites slides below 50 percent.

Friday, February 5, 2010

VIDEO: Cook defends fried chicken choice for Black History Month menu

By GottaLaff



I previously wrote a piece about a controversial menu honoring Black History Month that was posted at the NBC commissary.

There have been valid arguments for both sides of this story. However, I think Leslie Calhoun, the chef, wins the day on this one.

And now, thanks to GrrrlRomeo, we have a wonderful video that explains Ms. Calhoun's decisions, in her own words.

There's more here, follow the link:

One person who doesn't understand how offense could be taken: Chef Leslie Calhoun. It was her decision to select the menu items and create the sign. TheGrio caught up with her minutes after the tweet fiasco erupted and she seemed genuinely upset by the whole thing. Calhoun is an African-American and employee of Flick, a catering service that runs the NBC commissary. She said that for the last eight years she's been seeking approval from Flick management for a special Black History Month menu, and had finally been told that every Thursday for the month of February, she could serve whatever she chose. [...]

This isn't the first time this year that fried chicken and collard greens on a menu have created a stir. Last month, Denver Public Schools experienced a backlash after announcing they would serve fried chicken and collard greens in honor of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
It's good to have both sides aired. Fair and balanced and all that, right?

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Oh no they di-in't!

By GottaLaff
UPDATE HERE. Video of the chef that clears a lot of things up.

What better way to celebrate Black History Month than by serving up a steaming plateful of stereotype?

NBCU employee Questlove is bringing it to the attention of his 1 million plus Twitter followers.
Ooops.
Questlove, the band leader and drummer for The Roots (the house band on Late Night with Jimmy Fallon) tweeted this picture from the NBC Commissary at 30 Rock, with the comment: “Hmm HR?”


Oh, but don't worry your pretty little head about it:


Apparently, not everyone was offended by it. They're just apologizing to those of us who were.

Oh sorry. Apologized for anyone who was offended. Not only are they insensitive, they're illiterate, too.

Good thing they removed it before only a million of us saw it. Whew! Close call.

Brought to you by the very same group that makes Al Franken a little jittery.

UPDATE: The apology came from someone who has a grand total of 9 followers on Twitter. I'm guessing it won't be too effective.

H/t: Misha 1234, Raine 1967

Thursday, January 28, 2010

VIDEO: Chris Matthews clarifies his appreciation of Obama's post-racialism

By GottaLaff

Earlier, Paddy posted the video of Tweety's "I forgot he was black" comment following President Obama's State of the Union speech. The Twitterverse reacted en masse over that one, including Melissa Harris Lacewell .


He must have gotten wind of that:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy


So is this another one of those Harry Reid "different generation" moments? Or as "not OK" as it seemed to so many?

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Poll-itics: African-Americans are dramatically more upbeat than in past 25 years

By GottaLaff

Turn that frown upside down:

Despite a recession that's disproportionately affected their community, African-Americans are dramatically more upbeat about their progress in this country than at any time during the past quarter century, according to a new Pew Research Center poll.

Barack Obama's election as the nation's first African-American president is credited for the increased optimism that's reflected in a range of issues, including race relations and expectations for further African-American progress.

Do you mean to tell me that a light-skinned African American who only talks Negro at certain events has African Americans fooled into feeling more optimistic? Someone better tell the authors of Game Change. They've been all over the Tee Vee Machine making mischief.

In the survey, 39 percent of African-Americans said "the situation of black people in this country" is better off now than it was five years ago, almost double the 20 percent who said that in 2007. [...]

Fifty-three percent of African-Americans said life for African-Americans in the future will be better than it is now, while only 10 percent predicted that things would get worse. In 2007, 44 percent said things would get better and 21 percent said worse.

As for that light-skinned business:

Fifty-five percent of African-Americans said Obama is an African-American, while 34 percent said he's of mixed race. Whites' opinions split in almost opposite proportion: 53 percent said he's of mixed race, while 24 percent said he's African-American.
There's a lot more. Go take a look.

Phony indignation = news

By GottaLaff

This is one of my pet topics. What was once hard news has gradually morphed into tabloid gossip, shouting matches, and bi-polar self-righteousness that is passed off as fair and balanced reporting.

The news dee jays and spokesmodels are like permissive, self-serving parents who enable rapt children who plug into frothy politics like they were narcotic iPods.

And so the viewing audience is hooked on manufactured drama the way Boss Limpdong is addicted to Oxycontin:

It's appropriate that a book about the 2008 campaign -- Mark Halperin and John Heilemann's newly published "Game Change" -- has given us yet another example in which phony outrage over an out-of-context sound bite captivates the media all out of proportion to the offensiveness of the remark. The statement was Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's 2008 comment that he expected Obama to fare better electorally than previous black presidential aspirants partly because of his lighter skin tone and lack of "Negro dialect" -- a term, incidentally, that the "Google Books" search engine finds in 3,780 publications, all before this year, none apparently racist. [...]

The most obvious reason is that it's a political game perfectly suited for our new news cycle. Episodes like the Reid comment provide "catnip for the news media," as Obama said, because of the new rhythms of cable TV and blogging, which intensify the old talk-radio pattern: polarized and combative, with guest experts and pundits chosen to parrot each side's arguments with requisite rage. Verbal missteps work well for cable because they require little explanation (so the fight can begin quickly); they lend themselves to simple partisan battles; and viewers can readily align their own emotions with one side or the other.

The media, of course, reflect our politics, and a second reason these flaps are so common lately is that they fit well with our divided and mutually suspicious condition. [...]

Then there's a third, less obvious reason that the outrage game is thriving: its connection to the politics of race. [...]

Ultimately, explaining all the subtleties of a linguistic concept like "Negro dialect" -- or any other touchy subjects that could trigger such an episode -- demands more time, patience and intellectual precision than the leading producers and avid consumers of our breakneck political discussions wish to indulge.

David Greenberg is a professor of history and journalism and media studies at Rutgers University and the author of "Nixon's Shadow: The History of an Image" and other books.
Much more here.

Monday, January 11, 2010

Reid "didn't say anything many Americans -- especially us Negroes -- don't already know"

By GottaLaff

http://www.schoodoodle.com/weblog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Harry_Reid.jpg

Sandy Banks, a regular contributor to the L.A. Times, wrote about her feelings regarding the Harry Reid "Negro" remarks:
Harry Reid doesn't owe me an apology.

Sure, it was a little odd to see the term "Negro" used outside of a history class or documentary. Sounds like Reid is stuck in the last century.

But the Senate majority leader didn't say anything many Americans -- especially us Negroes -- don't already know.

If you're black, it is easier in this country to be light-skinned. [...]

Obama came by his light skin and dialectical flexibility differently -- as a biracial, bicultural son. But he's a political beneficiary of our color-conscious society; to pretend otherwise is disingenuous.

Reid was stating a fact, however indelicate and impolitic.
Original post about Reid's apology here. Follow-up saying he's not going anywhere here.
But I don't know why I should be offended.

If anyone is insulted, it should be whites -- whom Reid accused implicitly of being willing to vote for a black man only if he talks like them and is not too black.

I think the next apology ought to come from Michael Steele -- the light-skinned, dialectically flexible African American head of the Republican National Committee. [...]

Either Steele is playing politics with a combustible case, or he thinks Americans are so incapable of thinking intelligently about race that we can't tell the difference between Lott and Reid.

Now that offends me.
Please read the whole thing here.

Reid's talking points, intended to blunt fallout here.

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

Video- Animosity against Obama based on race?


Here's that typical cable race discussion I was talking about.

Sunday, August 2, 2009

Frank Rich: Teachable beer moment ended with a burp--"Village People populism"

By GottaLaff

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2009/08/02/opinion/rich190.jpg

Frank Rich:

THE comforting thing about each “national conversation on race” is that the “teachable moment” passes before any serious conversation can get going.

This one ended with a burp. The debate about which brew would best give President Obama Joe Six-Pack cred in his White House beer op with Harvard’s town-and-gown antagonists hit the front page of The Wall Street Journal. [...]

He answers a single, legitimate race-based question at the end of a news conference and is roundly condemned for “stepping on his own message” about health care. It was the noisiest sector of the news media that did much of the stepping. “Health care is bad for ratings,” explained one cable anchor, Dylan Ratigan of MSNBC, with refreshing public candor. What a relief, then, to drop dreary debates about the public option and declare a national conversation about black-white fisticuffs. [...]

[L]et’s note that the only crime Obama committed at his news conference was honesty (always impolitic in Washington). He conceded he did not know “all the facts” and so wisely resisted passing judgment on “what role race played” in the incident. He said, accurately, that “separate and apart from this incident” there is “a long history” of “African-Americans and Latinos being stopped by law enforcing disproportionately.” And, yes, the police did act “stupidly in arresting” — not to mention shackling — “somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own home.” If Obama had really wanted to go for the jugular, he might have added that the police may have overstepped the law as well. [...]

Whalen, who was pilloried as a racist because of Crowley’s report, received no apology from him and no White House invitation from Obama. That’s stupid behavior by both men.

It’s also stupid to look at Harvard as a paradigm of anything, race included. If there was a teachable moment in this incident, it could be found in how some powerful white people well beyond Cambridge responded to it. That reaction is merely the latest example of how the inexorable transformation of America into a white-minority country in some 30 years — by 2042 in the latest Census Bureau estimate is causing serious jitters, if not panic, in some white establishments.

Ground zero for this hysteria is Fox News [...]

What about those far more famous leaders in Hume’s own camp who insistently cry “racist” — and in public forums — without any credible justification whatsoever? [...] They include Rush Limbaugh and Newt Gingrich, both of whom labeled Sonia Sotomayor a racist. Their ranks were joined last week by Glenn Beck, who on Fox News inexplicably labeled Obama a racist with “a deep-seated hatred for white people,” presumably including his own mother.

What provokes their angry and nonsensical cries of racism is sheer desperation: an entire country is changing faster than these white guys bargained for. [...]

Even Texas may be tinting blue, and as goes Texas, so will all but the dwindling rural minority of the Electoral College. [...]

This bizarre “birther” movement, out to prove that Obama is not a naturally born citizen, first gained notice in the summer of 2008 when it was being advanced by the author Jerome Corsi, a leader of the Swift boat assault on Kerry. That it revved up again as Gatesgate boiled over and Sotomayor sped toward Senate confirmation is not a coincidence.

Obama’s election, far from alleviating paranoia in the white fringe, has only compounded it. There is no purer expression of this animus than to claim that Obama is literally not an American — or, as Sarah Palin would have it, not a “real American.” The birth-certificate canard is just the latest version of those campaign-year attempts to strip Obama of his American identity with faux controversies over flag pins, the Pledge of Allegiance and his middle name. [...]

One of the loudest birther enablers is not at Fox but CNN: Lou Dobbs, who was heretofore best known for trying to link immigrants, especially Hispanics, to civic havoc. [...]

As Eugene Robinson of The Washington Post and Helene Cooper of The Times have pointed out, a lot of today’s variation on the theme is class-oriented. Some whites habituated to a monopoly on the upper reaches of American power just can’t adjust to the reality that Obama, Sotomayor, Oprah Winfrey and countless others are now at the very pinnacle, and that they might sometimes side with each other just as their white counterparts do. Threatened white elites try to mask their own anxieties by patronizingly adopting working-class whites as their pet political surrogates — Joe the Plumber, New Haven firemen, a Cambridge police officer. Call it Village People populism. [...]

America has not transcended race. America is not postracial. So we can all say that again. But it must also be said that we’re just at the start of what may be a 30-year struggle. Beer won’t cool the fury of those who can’t accept the reality that America’s racial profile will no longer reflect their own.

Thursday, July 16, 2009

VIDEO: Maddow v. Buchanan on Sotomayor hearings, race. 2 words: No contest.

By GottaLaff

Gimme a B! B! Gimme an I! I! Gimme a G! G! Gimme an O! O! Gimme a T! T! Whaddya got? BUCHANAN!



H/t: Cody

Thursday, May 7, 2009

VIDEO-- Furniture ad transcends race: Genius or insanity?

By GottaLaff

Hilarious:



Insanius? Gensanity?

H/t: Babzter

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Obama seeks to change crack sentences

By GottaLaff

http://www.drugs.org.im/images/CRACK%20PARAPHERNALIA.jpg
Crack-ing the whip, finally:

The Obama administration joined a federal judge Wednesday in urging Congress to end a racial disparity by equalizing prison sentences for dealing and using crack versus powdered cocaine.

"Jails are loaded with people who look like me," U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton, an African-American, told a Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing.

Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer said the administration believes Congress' goal "should be to completely eliminate the disparity" between the two forms of cocaine. "A growing number of citizens view it as fundamentally unfair," Breuer testified. [...]

Durbin said more than 81 percent of those convicted for crack offenses in 2007 were African-American, although only about 25 percent of crack cocaine users are African Americans.

Another campaign promise kept:

President Barack Obama had called for such a change while campaigning for the White House. [...]

The Obama administration is also seeking to increase drug treatment, as well as rehabilitation programs for felons after they're released from prison.

Monday, April 27, 2009

Poll-itics: Obama’s Term Is Altering Views on Race

By GottaLaff

http://pro.corbis.com/images/O-029-0793.jpg?size=67&uid=%7B8D19F8A4-F91F-4242-B86A-D2BB54C93693%7D
Making a difference:

Barack Obama’s presidency seems to be altering the public perception of race relations in the United States. Two-thirds of Americans now say race relations are generally good and the percentage of blacks who say so has doubled since last July, according to the latest New York Times/ CBS News poll.

Despite that, half of blacks still say whites have a better chance of getting ahead in American society, the poll found. Black Americans remain among the president’s staunchest supporters; 70 percent of black respondents now say the country is headed in the right direction, compared to 34 percent of whites.

The poll found broad support for Mr. Obama’s approach on a variety of issues, including one of the most contentious on his plate right now: whether Congress should investigate the harsh interrogation tactics authorized by his predecessor, George W. Bush. Sixty-two percent of Americans share Mr. Obama’s view that hearings are unnecessary.

As Mr. Obama approaches the 100th day of his presidency, Americans seem to have high hopes for him; 72 percent said they are optimistic about the next four years. By and large, Americans expect the president to make significant progress in revamping health care, energy and immigration policy, issues central to his ambitious domestic agenda.

But the optimism is tempered by a feeling of resignation about two of the most difficult challenges the president faces: reviving the economy and ending United States military involvement in Iraq. Most Americans say Mr. Obama has begun to make progress on both fronts, but many do not expect either the recession or the war to be over by the end of his term.

It is not unusual for new presidents to enjoy substantial public support at this point in their terms. But Mr. Obama’s 68 percent job approval rating is higher than that of any recent president at the 100-day mark. Former President George W. Bush had the approval of 56 percent of the public at this juncture. [...]

Fewer than half of those surveyed, 48 percent, said Mr. Obama had begun to make progress on one of his major campaign promises, changing the way business is conducted in Washington. And just 39 percent said Mr. Obama had begun to make progress on another major promise, cutting taxes for middle-class Americans, even though the stimulus bill he signed into law does include a middle class tax cut. [...]

“With all Obama wants to do and all he’s got going, it’s going to take more than four years,” said Larry Gibbons, 58, a retired restaurant manager and Republican in Phoenix who voted for Mr. Obama’s opponent, John McCain. Speaking in a follow-up interview, he added, “Obama is attacking everything at once and I do approve of that.” [...]

Another Democrat, Lisa Fleming, 49, who is white, said that even in the small Illinois town, Potomac, where she lives, she notices ‘’people of different races being kinder to each other” since Mr. Obama’s election. A white Republican homemaker in Kansas City, Mary Robertson, 78, said Mr. Obama’s ‘’openness and acceptance have helped others be more open and accepting.”
Much more here.

Saturday, March 14, 2009

Sporst Illustrated: "There is something masterful about Todd Palin"

By GottaLaff

2009-03-14-ht_iron_dog4_080830_mn.jpg
That romantic, starry-eyed Sports Illustrated! Every month a new infatuation, the little strumpets:
[A]s part of SI's web "bonus," the venerable sports mag featured a profile of Todd Palin and his participation in Alaska's annual Iron Dog--a snowmachine endurance race through the frozen western half of the state billed as the "toughest in the world." [...]

In his article, "The 'First Dude' in His Element," Donahue proclaims:

There is something masterful about Todd Palin. He is almost invariably calm, and he is handsome and rock-steady in an affable, unobtrusive way. He is the perfect political husband.

Donahue was clearly taken by Palin and his partner, Scott Davis, referring to their "lean, gym-sculpted physiques."

Gives the term "snowmachine endurance" a whole new meaning.

But S.I.'s crush is superficial. They, as so many blinded by lust do, ignore what lies beneath Todd's big, bad, macho six-packy surface.

They skip right over this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, and this.

In spite of those remarkable holes in his coverage, Donahue does allow that there's "a political resonance to the whole [Iron Dog] scene."

On two race sleds are bumper stickers reading AMERICA. LOVE IT, DEFEND IT, OR GET THE HELL OUT. On another there's a mock ALASKA TERRORIST HUNTING PERMIT, good through 2050, with the license number 9-11-01. Tina Fey is not here amid the wafting aroma of two-stroke motor oil. Neither is Michelle Obama.
[...] When Sarah Palin was named John McCain's running mate, husband Todd was heralded as a "world champion" athlete. Donahue's description of the Iron Dog reveals it for what it is, something closer akin to a long-distance motorcycle poker run, with a handful of requisite rest stops along the way, during which the contestants eat hardy meals, refuel, sleep in warm beds and, that's right, even shower along the way.

It's quite a cast, but World Class athletes? [...] [I]t looks more like a slow-pitch softball team to me--or something that belongs on the wall of the local post office.


(go here for an interactive look, or click on image to enlarge)

Sigh. Ain't puppy love grand? Then again, familiarity breeds contempt.

Saturday, March 7, 2009

Obama retreats from Holder's race comment

By GottaLaff

Remember this comment by Attorney General Holder at an event celebrating Black History Month.?

"Though this nation has proudly thought of itself as an ethnic melting pot, in things racial, we have always been and we -- I believe continue to be in too many ways essentially a nation of cowards."
President Obama is taking the discussion in another direction:
President Barack Obama says he would not have used the same language that Eric Holder did last month [...]

"We've made enormous progress and we shouldn't lose sight of that," Obama told The New York Times in an interview posted on the newspaper's Web site Saturday.

The president said he understood Holder to be saying the country often is uncomfortable talking about race until there's a racial flare-up or conflict and that the nation probably could be more constructive in facing up to slavery and discrimination.

The first U.S. black president gently departed from the tone of the comments by the country's first black attorney general.

The president said he is not someone who believes that constantly talking about race can solve racial tensions. To address that problem, it will mean fixing the economy, putting people to work, making sure that people have health care and ensuring that children are learning, Obama said.

"I think if we do that, then we'll probably have more fruitful conversations," Obama said in the interview Friday aboard Air Force One.

Did you know President Obama is black? I'm surprised they didn't call this "breaking news".

UPDATE: Audio of President Obama's remarks here.

Sunday, January 18, 2009

Bigger than race

By GottaLaff


Barry Blitt
Frank Rich:
For all our huge progress, we are not “post-racial,” whatever that means. The world doesn’t change in a day, and the racial frictions that emerged in both the Democratic primary campaign and the general election didn’t end on Nov. 4. As Obama himself said in his great speech on race, liberals couldn’t “purchase racial reconciliation on the cheap” simply by voting for him. And conservatives? The so-called party of Lincoln has spent much of the past month in spirited debate about whether a white candidate for the party’s chairmanship did the right thing by sending out a “humorous” recording of “Barack the Magic Negro” as a holiday gift.

Next to much of our history, this is small stuff. And yet: Of all the coverage of Obama’s victory, the most accurate take may still be the piquant morning-after summation of the satirical newspaper The Onion. Under the headline “Black Man Given Nation’s Worst Job,” it reported that our new president will have “to spend four to eight years cleaning up the messes other people left behind.

Those messes are enormous, bigger than Washington, bigger than race, bigger than anything most of us have ever seen. Nearly three months after Election Day, it remains astonishing that the American people have entrusted the job to a young black man who seemed to come out of nowhere looking for that kind of work just as we most needed him.

“In no other country on earth is my story even possible,” Obama is fond of saying. That is true, and that is what the country celebrates this week. But it is all the tragic American stories that came before him, some of them still playing out in chilly streets just blocks from the White House, that throw both his remarkable triumph and the huge challenge ahead of him into such heart-stopping relief.
Tears. Happy ones and sad ones.

Sunday, November 2, 2008

Updates from Nevada and Missouri, courtesy of Chuck Todd

By GottaLaff

Chuck Todd is discussing the election with two reporters right now on MSNBC:

Gramm-pa McCain's gotta win SW Missouri big. He needs a strong turnout there. So says one reporter, Jo Mannies of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. She says that they won't go for Obama, but that she's not seeing a big win for Gramm-pa in that region.

Jon Ralston of the Las Vegas Sun is pretty much saying Obama will win Nevada.

And yes, race plays a part in the rural areas of both states, the reporters say.

Friday, October 24, 2008

Poll: Age may play bigger role than race on Election Day

By GottaLaff

Nah, race isn't that big a factor. But I'll shut up until you read the whole post:

A new national survey suggests that race won't be a major factor in the outcome of the presidential election.

Seven out of ten Americans questioned in a CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Survey released Friday say that the race of the candidates will not be a factor in their vote for president this year. That 70 percent figure is up 9 points from July, when the same question was asked. Only 5 percent of those polled say race will be the single most important factor in their choice for president, with 11 percent saying it's one of several important factors, and 13 percent indicating race will be a minor factor in their vote.

I'm not so sure that 70% is something to celebrate, but okay, we'll take what we can get at this point.

So how will race affect the results on election day?

"First, don't assume that everyone who says that race is factor in their votes are voting against Obama,” says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland.

He adds that some voters are choosing Obama because of his race — and that many of those who say that race will influence their votes are Republicans who were highly unlikely to vote for any Democrat this year.

"By one complicated measure, the number of votes Obama may lose due to his race is roughly equal to the number who will vote for him because he is black. And both those numbers appear to be small, possibly just one percentage point in each direction," says Holland.

One question that often comes up when discussing polling regarding race is whether those being polled are telling the truth. Holland says that the survey results should be taken with a grain of salt: “ race is a complicated topic and polls may not reveal each respondent's true feelings on this hot-button issue,” says Holland.

Then what was the point of the poll? It's been that kind of day. Don't even get me started about my little tiff with Time/Warner just now. Moving on. What about age, already?

Roughly half of those polled say the age of the candidates will affect their vote, a number essentially unchanged since July. Three percent said age would be the most important factor in determining their presidential pick, with 19 percent saying it would be one of several important factors, and 25 percent saying it would be a minor factor.

Boy, that was a long way to go for one lousy paragraph. My Time/Warner convo took less time.

Monday, October 20, 2008

106 Year-Old Obama Supporter Excited about the First Black U.S. President



Too cute. There should be a "106 year olds for Obama" group! h/t Amy C.

Recent Posts