Showing posts with label Facebook. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Facebook. Show all posts

Friday, April 30, 2010

Sarah Palin Quote- "Domestic Drilling: Why We Can Still Believe"

By GottaLaff

Polluta McOil$lick has finally admitted she prays to the Oil Gods. She's a believer:

Her ghost writer's Facebook post includes the following:

...Todd, an Alaska Native and trained oil spill responder...

I'm not sure why that sentence struck me as odd, but it did.

Now for the nauseating parts:

We still believe in responsible development, which includes drilling to extract energy sources, because we know that there is an inherent link between energy and security, energy and prosperity, and energy and freedom.

I wonder how secure, energetic, and prosperous Louisiana, Mississippi, and other Gulf states feel now that they have decades of clean-up and regrowth after all that oily, deadly destruction.

We need oil, and if we don’t drill for it here, we have to purchase it from countries that not only do not like America and can use energy purchases as a weapon against us, but also do not have the oversight that America has.

We need clean energy, not finite, dwindling, minimal, insufficient amounts of filthy fossil fuels. And Polluta, you might want to rethink that part about "oversight". Had there been proper oversight, this catastrophe might have been avoided.

Actions will be taken to increase oversight to prevent future accidents.

Too late.

Government can and must play an appropriate role here.

Would that be the same Commie Marxist fascist government you think is too big and too intrusive? So you need them now, do you, Polluta?

It is inexcusable for any oil company to not invest in preventative measures. They must be held accountable or the public will forever distrust the industry.

Too late.

I repeat the slogan “drill here, drill now” not out of naiveté or disregard for the tragic consequences of oil spills [...] I continue to believe in it because increased domestic oil production will make us a more secure, prosperous, and peaceful nation.

It's hard to imagine the affected states feeling very secure, prosperous, or at peace right about now. But now we're just repeating ourselves, aren't we Polluta?

May spill responders be safe.

...and obsolete in the near future, when we start depending on wind and solar energy, not polluting, dirty, wasteful, expensive, intrusive energy sources.

Sorry, Polluta, but I'm not a believer.


UPDATE: I forgot to share these comments from the Facebook page (click to enlarge):

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Sarah Palin's newest ghost writer on Facebook

By GottaLaff

Illiterata McKidScrawl got someone brand new to post for her on her Facebook blog! To see how bright and shiny and defensive he is, follow this link:

Let this latest dismissed complaint serve as a reminder for one of the real—and stated—reasons for her voluntary relinquishment of office, an office she campaigned for diligently, tirelessly and effectively. It stands as a marker that occasionally, every so often, there are public servants who can recognize the difference between self-interest and public interest. Sarah Palin is one such public servant.

- Thomas Van Flein, personal attorney for Sarah Palin

Yes, she is. Illiterata can tell the difference, and chose the former.

Senators urge Facebook CEO to change privacy settings

By GottaLaff

I'm beginning the entire world needs to change its privacy settings. It's fairly obvious that there is no such thing any more:

Four Democratic senators called on Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg Tuesday to reconsider the recent changes in its privacy settings and asked the Federal Trade Commission to streamline guidelines regarding privacy on all social networks. [...]

Schumer, Sens. Michael Bennet of Colorado, Mark Begich of Alaska and Al Franken of Minnesota sent a letter to Zuckerberg about Facebook's decision to allow third-party sharing of user's information.

"We are writing to express our concern regarding recent changes to the Facebook privacy policy and the use of personal data on third party websites," the senators wrote. "The expansion of Facebook – both in the number of users and applications – raises new concerns for users who want to maintain control over their information."


They went on to say how the "opt out" option should be an "opt in" option. It is pretty confusing, and the default setting is less, not more, privacy. The responsibility falls to the user, and if someone is unaware of that, or if they can't figure out Facebook's system, then information is shared with other sites.

Facebook is glitchy enough without having to worry about personal info being inadvertently shared on the InterWebs.

Sarah Palin Tea Patriot event tickets are not selling, even at 50% off

By GottaLaff

Do I sense just a touch of desperation in this here e-mail?

Because of our close partnership with WIND, members of the Chicago Tea Patriots have been offered a special ticket price of 50% off all remaining tickets.

In order to take advantage of this special ticket pricing, please go to www.Ticketmaster.com or call 800-745-3000 and use the code word: WIND.

Additional information about "An Evening with Sarah Palin" can be found at www.560WIND.com

Buses will be chartered and leave from the Mt. Greenwood/Oak Lawn and Midway Airport areas. Please let me know, if you would like to take the bus.

And if you do attend, make sure you stop by and say hi to the Chicago Tea Patriots, who will be teaming up with Adam Andrzjewski of Open the Books and David Smith of the Illinois Family Institute -- a trio of conservatives.

Feel free to contact me with questions or concerns.

I'm real excited and look forward to seeing you.

God bless,

Catherina Wojtowicz,
Chicago Tea Patriots
312-xxxxxxx
www.ChicagoTeaPatriots.com
ChicagoTeaPatriots@Gmail.com

The event I RSVP'ed to, to get on the e-mail list can be found [here] at: http://www.facebook.com/#!/event.php?eid=121079247907868

WIND Radio - home to Glenn Beck - is hosting Governor Sarah Palin Wednesday, May 12th, 7 p.m., at the Rosemont Theatre.

Tickets and info can be found at www.560WIND.com

The Chicago Tea Patriots will have buses to take those interested to the Rosemont Theatre. Please contact me for details. Buses will collect passengers in the Mt. Greenwood/Oak Lawn and Midway Airport areas.

The Chicago Tea Patriots, along with Adam Andrzejewski and the Illinois Family Institute, will be sponsoring a table at the event, so please stop by to say hi! Chicago Tea Patriot tee shirts will be on sale at the event, too!

This is going to a great evening for conservatives to spend together celebrate the approaching elections!

If you would like to reserve a seat on the bus, please let me know.

Catherina Wojtowicz,
312-xxxxxxx
Chicago Tea Patriots
www.ChicagoTeaPatriots.com

I toddled on over to the Facebook page, and look what I found:

For any other information, you need to phone me. Send me a note or call me, and if I feel comfortable with you, I will give you further details on the bus and other issues.

Otherwsise, you are on your own. Sorry but, I've received too many hate calls.

Yikes.

Well, at least with tickets going for a big 50% discount, there was an uptick in sales, right? Who could not afford an opportunity to listen to the wisdom of Half-Gov McHalf-Off?

(click on image to enlarge)


Oops. Never mind.

Oh, and just by the way, per my source, Catherina Wojtowicz, is the same lady who led the tea baggers in harassing Midge Hough at the Dan Lipinksi town hall.

Friday, April 23, 2010

Million-Fan Anti-Obama Page Doesn't Break Facebook Rules

By GottaLaff

On April 15, I posted screen grabs of a(nother) horrific Facebook page wishing very bad things upon our president.

Here is one of the shots:



Today on Twitter, I've had a number of people ask me why the page hasn't been taken down yet, especially in light of all the reporting it to the powers that be.

Now we have our answer:

Our Roll Call colleague Daniel Newhauser reports that an anti-Obama Facebook page doesn't violate the site's standards. So it will stay up -- and keep annoying people who are offended at the idea of praying for a death.

Some standards.

When I first posted, the number of "fans" was at about 73,000. Guess what it is now...

Go ahead, guess. I'll wait.

... ... ...


... ... ...



That's right, 1,064,757 "like this." And that's just on a Facebook page.

1,064,757 "like" hatred, death, and this:

David Skinner: The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. --- Thomas Jefferson

Thursday, April 15, 2010

Facebook page wants "lord to take" President Obama the way He took Michael Jackson

By GottaLaff

I hate to do this, but here we go again. As of this writing, there are 73,086 fans on a Facebook page that shouldn't exist.

Over 73,000 people are endorsing a racist death wish aimed at our president.

And as always, the only way I know how to do my part is to expose this kind of filth, report it, shine light on it, and eventually, get it deleted. Yes, it will pop up elsewhere, but IMHO, ignoring it is not the answer.

Click on images to enlarge:


Here are the "fan photos". Some fans, huh?

Under "info", this is all that appears:

Basic Info

Location: Marysville, OH, 43040


Today is TeaBagger Tax Day, or as I like to call it, Scream Your Lungs Out While Sponging Off the Government Day. (follow the link) Similar images and sentiments have been provided by the TeaBaggers. That familiar, scary mob mentality is becoming more prevalent by the day, reports of violence and militia movements have increased, and overt expressions of hate have been directed at our Congress members.

This page is representative of that. My wish continues to be that those in positions of leadership will speak out as often as the loons, and eventually drown out their horrific message.

Of course, that may be asking too much, considering the money that's being pulled in on their behalf.

H/t: DarthSpacegrass

UPDATE: Reader Drew reminds us of this original story about Chris Christie, and how the above page was meant to be a response to it... which of course, is no justification whatsoever.

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

"Do you think your members are really at risk?" Hoyer: "Yes."

By GottaLaff

(click on image to enlarge)

I caught the tail end of some Q and A with Steny Hoyer about the latest violence against Congress members.

Here is the most recent example:


The FBI, along with Albemarle County's Fire Marshal, are investigating a cut gas line in the Peacock Hills section of Ivy. The home is owned by the brother of Congressman Tom Perriello (D).

According to NBC news, 10 have been targeted so far.

Reporter:

Do you think your members are really at risk?

Hoyer:

Yes.

Other snippets:

We'll try to determine if crimes were committed.... Members targeted are getting proper attention.

We have spoken to Republican leaders. Republicans have agreed that what I just said "was appropriate". A joint statement may be issued.

Hoyer also referred to targets with cross hairs being placed over images of states of members of Congress (who are up for re-election)... which is exactly what was on Sarah Palin's Facebook page.

Inciting violence again, Reload McFacebook? Bullseye.

As usual, Rachel Maddow has the most substantive reporting on this topic:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Teabaggers aim to repeal Health Care Reform with online Facebook petition


Good lord, do they even teach civics in the schools any more? Via Wonkette-

Oh boy guess what? The Teabaggers figured out a magical way to REPEAL the not-yet-signed Health Care Reform Bill. But does it require getting up off your fat f******* lard ass and turning away from the ‘puter for a moment? Not at all! And is it potentially effective, or even loosely based on American Democracy or the much-loved but never-read U.S. Constitution? Nope, not at all! Let’s do this thing.

The RedState/Malkin-endorsed Tea Party Patriots web-blog busts out this Legislative Weapon:

Repeal The Bill!
Step One: Sign the petition.
Step Two: Help get 1 million signatures by sharing with everyone on your facebook pages.
Step Three: Use the ‘I Signed The Petition’ image on your facebook and twitter profiles.

Saturday, February 27, 2010

U.S. military OKs use of online social media


Ha! They used Twitter to announce it's okay to use Facebook and vice versa.

Washington (CNN) -- U.S. military personnel are officially allowed to tweet.

That's the upshot of the Pentagon's long-awaited policy on rank and file personnel using online social media, unveiled Friday. The new rules authorize access to Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and other social media Web sites from nonclassified government computers -- as long as such activity doesn't compromise operational security or involve prohibited activities or Web sites.

Until now, the military's various branches and departments had differing policies regarding social media use. The Marine Corps, for instance, prohibited use of social media sites from its computers in 2007, according to the Pentagon.

The Pentagon announced the policy Friday via social media such as Facebook and Twitter, in addition to using the Department of Defense's Web site, said spokesman Bryan Whitman.

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Anti-Obama Facebook page: 483,518 fans, racist, homophobic, anti-Semitic images

By GottaLaff

UPDATE: The number of "fans" has topped half a million since the original post.

My pal over at Windy City Watch has graciously invited me to cross post this latest offering from a Facebook page, which is yet another appalling collection of racist sewage.

WCW and I agree that one way to eradicate these cretins is to expose them. The post says it all, so I have nothing to add (Please note: You'll have to scroll down to view the photos, out of consideration for those who wish to avoid them):


[...] A quick survey of the page’s photo gallery features at least 20, out of 443, offensive photos (racist, homophobic, anti-semitic) referencing President Obama as well as the First Lady.

Now let me be clear, opposing and criticizing President Obama IS NOT racist, however using some of the offensive imagery found in this photo gallery to attack him is.

I find it both pathetic and insulting that folks who post, e-mail and defend the use of these offensive images will portray those of us who dare to call them out on their bigotry as accusing anyone who does not the support Obama as racist, THAT SIMPLY IS NOT TRUE.

What is true is that there is a significant number of Obama detractors who are motivated by racism and I have no problem saying that.

To those who claim not to be racist I encourage you to strongly condemn this crap.

Now that the light has been shown on this fan page lets talk about potential fall out:

* Some will quit the page. [...]

* The page’s administrators or Facebook might remove the photos or even delete the page entirely, only to have it replaced by others, which will be equally offensive.

* Others will defend the content on First Amendment grounds, these folks usually are low information activists/bigots/voters who don’t really know what the First Amendment is about.

For starters I should note that I have not demanded that this page or the photos be taken down, I wouldn’t mind leaving it up just to show how racist some of Obama’s detractors are.

Secondly, those moaning about free speech should know that as they exercise their rights to be unrepentant racists, many of us will exercise our rights to call them, what they are, BIGOTS.

Lastly, the First Amendment only deals with the government restricting speech, Facebook who could face a member/advertiser backlash, can do whatever it wants if it feels this page hurts its image and damages its bottom line.

Below are some screen caps of some of the offending pictures...



















[18_2.jpg]

Obama shines Palin's shoes


Watermelons at the White House


Pure ignorance


Confederates over throw the Capitol


Anti-Semitism


Racist birther photo


Obama as a pimp


Homophobic


Obama as a monkey


Sexual stereotypes of Black Men/White Women


Obama as a Muslim


Obama using saying "Aw Hell Naw"


Obama taking Palin from behind


Attack on the First Lady


Another attack on the First Lady


Attack on the homeless


Putting anti-white slurs in Obama's mouth


Witch doctor

Obama as a thug


Nearly half a million "fans". Welcome to "Real America".

Monday, February 1, 2010

Report: Sarah Palin's Facebook ghost writers revealed

By GottaLaff

http://principalquattrano.com/imagesmisc/two-faced_sarah.jpg

If this is what Face-y McPayWriters considered an improvement... wow. Seriously, if you're going to shell out money for ghost writers, at least find ones who can make decent points.

The Mudflats has a great post on The Many Faces of Palin's Facebook, but I'll just zero in on:
The ghost-FaceBookers (two of them, anyway) are reported now to be two of the founders of the blog Conservatives4Palin – Rebecca Mansour and Joseph Russo. The blog was based out of state, and filled the dearth of pro-Palin Alaska blogs. Eventually writers for the blog became regular phone-in guests for local conservative radio programs talking about those evil liberal Alaskan bloggers, and how swell Sarah Palin was. Objectively speaking, of course.

Yes, she’s two-”Faced.”

But this whole thing begs another question. She may not be writing the stuff, but does she even read it?

There's a lot there, so go read it all, including more about this:
The disclosure of the direct connection between C4P and Sarah Palin is highly embarrassing, because it is now more than obvious that the C4P “Webathon” for the Palin’s “Alaska Fund Trust” was most likely not a grassroots effort, but a coordinated effort with Sarah Palin – who offically has nothing to do at all with her slush-fund called “Alaska Fund Trust”.

Let me leave you with this delightful screen grab from Palingates: (click on it to enlarge)


There's a lot to read at that site, too. Palingates found some slimily interesting stuff, so hop on over.

Have fun! Don't stay out too late, now.

Saturday, January 30, 2010

Palin can't process what happened in Baltimore

By GottaLaff

Yesterday, President Obama handed the House GOP their asses. He debunked, he refuted, he stood his ground, he relied on facts, he stayed calm and in command, and he made them look like the empty, nasty, evasive party of nothing that they are.

As Mark Karlin over at BuzzFlash said:

[H]e exhibited a complete mastery of facts, detail, political motivation, hope and common sense.

Now, for some reason unfathomable to most of us, Fibby McBlogger feels she and her party have some sort of mandation. If she didn't, she wouldn't be ordering her ghost writer to work overtime, as she often has of late:
What am I missing, folks?
Brains and ethics?
We’re called obstructionists and made to feel uninformed in the Obamacare debate as we point out this is not a patient-driven, market-oriented approach to health care cost challenges. We’ve been saying for months that this is government takeover of our personal choices of insurers and doctors. We’re called liars when claiming that this is all about government mandates and control of up to a sixth of our economy.
Someone's been using her spel-l-l-check!
And yet, shockingly, the president admitted yesterday exactly what we’ve been saying: that his Democrats and lobbyists have crafted bills that in fact will prevent us from keeping our current insurance and/or choosing our own doctor. He said:
The last thing I will say, though -- let me say this about health care and the health care debate, because I think it also bears on a whole lot of other issues. If you look at the package that we’ve presented -- and there’s some stray cats and dogs that got in there that we were eliminating, we were in the process of eliminating. For example, we said from the start that it was going to be important for us to be consistent in saying to people if you can have your -- if you want to keep the health insurance you got, you can keep it, that you’re not going to have anybody getting in between you and your doctor in your decision making. And I think that some of the provisions that got snuck in might have violated that pledge. [emphasis added]
Isn't that just like Oblivia McNoseGrow. She forgot to add emphasis to this part:
...and there’s some stray cats and dogs that got in there that we were eliminating, we were in the process of eliminating.
Details, details...
Thanks to Tom Bevan at RCP for spotting this. The president’s statement is shocking, enlightening, and in an odd and unfortunate way also encouraging.
"Shocking, enlightening, and unfortunate" for their side. Encouraging to ours. See video.
Folks, this admission tells us we’re not off-base and we need to stay vigilant so we’re not missing anything else in this scheme. This trillion-dollar government takeover of our health care system is full of “stray dogs and cats” (the president’s words, not mine), and that’s what we’ve been saying all along.

Commonsense conservatives have better ideas on how to start tackling rising health care costs. Reps. Paul Ryan, Mike Pence, Eric Cantor, John Boehner, and others have offered solutions. I commend their efforts to counter the White House’s attempt to ram Obamacare through as these Congressmen seek bipartisan, sensible solutions. I implore them to speak louder because we’re listening, and we’re counting on them!
"Folks", President Obama demolished their "solutions" before they could sputter the words, "Cut the live feed!"

As for those GOP "bipartisan, sensible solutions", I repeat, see video. There were none. That pretense was put to rest by Prez O in record time.

I'm not sure what Druggy McWTF is on, but either she didn't watch so much as one minute of that exchange at the retreat, or she's even more delusional than I thought.

Friday, January 29, 2010

Unspeakable

By GottaLaff

UPDATE, GOOD NEWS: Looks like since I started writing this post and reported them, it's been taken down by Facebook.

Screen Grab, reluctantly. I am only posting this because it will disappear, and I must preserve a record of it. I'll drop the image down to the bottom of the post. Do not scroll down if you are offended by disgusting, hate-filled, racist, altered images of our president.

And yes, I reported them.

Previous posts about this group here.

The small print:

Added by Adolf Haitier
to the group "Fuck The Haiti Earthquake"

Comments: (Check out the last one... some things are NOT funny)

Josh TheKoolkid
Josh TheKoolkid
ur my hero :D
Yesterday at 4:41pm · Report
Nicolas Chevallier
Nicolas Chevallier
joshh ur gayy men !!
4 hours ago · Report
Adolf Haitier
Adolf Haitier
lol you guys think its offensive i voted for obama its just a parody learn to laugh
23 minutes ago · Report

H/t: EileenLeft























Thursday, January 28, 2010

Palin's crediblity gap

By GottaLaff

(click on image to enlarge)

LipSchmutz McQuitsStuff's ghost writer titled his/her latest Facebook entry "The Credibility Gap". How perfectly apt. That should be the title of everything he/she writes in Lippy's name:

While I don’t wish to speak too harshly about President Obama’s state of the union address, we live in challenging times that call for candor. I call them as I see them, and I hope my frank assessment will be taken as an honest effort to move this conversation forward.

While I don't wish to speak too harshly about this entry, but STFU about SOTU.

Last night, the president spoke of the “credibility gap” between the public’s expectations of their leaders and what those leaders actually deliver. “Credibility gap” is a good way to describe the chasm between rhetoric and reality in the president’s address. The contradictions seemed endless.

"Credibility gap" is a good way to describe the chasm between BaldFace McLieLips and reality. Your contradictions seem endless.

He called for Democrats and Republicans to “work through our differences,” but last year he dismissed any notion of bipartisanship when he smugly told Republicans, “I won.”

Earth to Barbie: He did. You didn't.

In case you haven't noticed, the Rushpublics need to hear those two words hourly.

He talked like a Washington “outsider,” but he runs Washington!

You say you're a maverick, talked like a Washington "outsider", yet you ran for V.P... who co-runs Washington.
He’s had everything any president could ask for – an overwhelming majority in Congress and a fawning press corps that feels tingles every time he speaks.

That was limited to Chris Matthews, Babs. Have you watched the news lately? Oh wait. You don't do that, despite the fact that you're on it all the time.

So let me clue you in: It skews right. You got more than your fair share of fawning, and as I recall, a few tingles of your own.

There was nothing preventing him from pursuing “common sense” solutions all along. He didn’t pursue them because they weren’t his priorities, and he spent his speech blaming Republicans for the problems caused by his own policies.

Two words: "You lie".

Oh, one more: Obstruction.

He dared us to “let him know” if we have a better health care plan, but he refused to allow Republicans in on the negotiations or consider any ideas for real free market and patient-centered reforms. We’ve been “letting him know” our ideas for months from the town halls to the tea parties, but he isn’t interested in listening. Instead he keeps making the nonsensical claim that his massive trillion-dollar health care bill won’t increase the deficit.

Shouting down speakers at town halls is not "letting him know". Neither, by the way, are Nazi/racist signs, and unworkable ideas. Nobody has come up with anything that approaches a serious alternative, and Obama's been listening longer than he should. Time for action... the democratic kind, not the unruly, gun-toting mob kind.

Americans are suffering from job losses and lower wages, yet the president practically demanded applause when he mentioned tax cuts, as if allowing people to keep more of their own hard-earned money is an act of noblesse oblige. He claims that he cut taxes, but I must have missed that. I see his policies as paving the way for massive tax increases and inflation, which is the “hidden tax” that most hurts the poor and the elderly living on fixed incomes.

Seriously, it's like she's unconscious. It's barely worth rebutting. Butting, maybe, but rebutting? It's like talking to a drum of oil.

He condemned lobbyists, but his White House is filled with former lobbyists, and this has been a banner year for K Street with his stimulus bill, aka the Lobbyist’s Full Employment Act. He talked about a “deficit of trust” and the need to “do our work in the open,” but he chased away the C-SPAN cameras and cut deals with insurance industry lobbyists behind closed doors.

He spoke of doing what’s best for the next generation and not leaving our children with a “mountain of debt,” but under his watch this year, government spending is up by 22%, and his budget will triple our national debt.

He spoke of a spending freeze, but doesn’t he realize that each new program he’s proposing comes with a new price tag? A spending freeze is a nice idea, but it doesn’t address the root cause of the problem. We need a comprehensive examination of the role of government spending. The president’s deficit commission is little more than a bipartisan tax hike committee, lending political cover to raise taxes without seriously addressing the problem of spending.
2001-2008. 'Nuff said.

He condemned bailouts, but he voted for them and then expanded and extended them. He praised the House’s financial reform bill, but where was Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae in that bill? He still hasn’t told us when we’ll be getting out of the auto and the mortgage industries. He praised small businesses, but he’s spent the past year as a friend to big corporations and their lobbyists, who always find a way to make government regulations work in their favor at the expense of their mom & pop competitors.

Title for a new play: "Whose Supreme Court Is It Anyway?" Friend to big corporations, indeed. Kiss my assets, Loopy McWTF.

He praised the effectiveness of his stimulus bill, but then he called for another one – this time cleverly renamed a “jobs bill.” The first stimulus was sold to us as a jobs bill that would keep unemployment under 8%. We now have double digit unemployment with no end in sight. Why should we trust this new “jobs bill”?

I repeat: 2001-2008. Plus, as I said in one of my previous FB retorts to you, the stimulus package takes time to work, and there are signs it already has.

He talked about “making tough decisions about opening new offshore areas for oil and gas development,” but apparently it’s still too tough for his Interior Secretary to move ahead with Virginia’s offshore oil and gas leases. If they’re dragging their feet on leases, how long will it take them to build “safe, clean nuclear power plants”? Meanwhile, he continued to emphasize “green jobs,” which require massive government subsidies for inefficient technologies that can’t survive on their own in the real world of the free market.

"Too tough", or smart enough not to Drill, Baby, Drill , Vapid McBoxOHair? Oh, and nuke plants aren't all that safe, nor can you store the waste products safely or efficiently.

And didja notice that he said we're still stuck using your cherished ancient, finite sources of energy while we build a thriving green power industry? Didja hear that part? I did.
He spoke of supporting young girls in Afghanistan who want to go to school and young women in Iran who courageously protest in the streets, but where were his words of encouragement to the young girls of Afghanistan in his West Point speech? And where was his support for the young women of Iran when they were being gunned down in the streets of Tehran?

Where was your support of women when you charged them for their own rape kits? Where were your words of encouragement when you wouldn't support their freedom of choice? Which is legal just by the way.
Despite speaking for over an hour, the president only spent 10% of his speech on foreign policy, and he left us with many unanswered questions. Does he still think trying the 9/11 terrorists in New York is a good idea? Does he still think closing Gitmo is a good idea? Does he still believe in Mirandizing terrorists after the Christmas bomber fiasco? Does he believe we’re in a war against terrorists, or does he think this is just a global crime spree? Does he understand that the first priority of our government is to keep our country safe?

Do you understand anything? At all?

In his address last night, the president once again revealed that there’s a fundamental disconnect between what the American people expect from their government, and what he wants to deliver. He’s still proposing failed top-down big government solutions to our problems. Instead of smaller, smarter government, he’s taken a government that was already too big and supersized it.

2001-2008. Again. Doing it your way worked out well, didn't it?

Real private sector jobs are created when taxes are low, investment is high, and people are free to go about their business without the heavy hand of government. The president thinks innovation comes from government subsidies. Common sense conservatives know innovation comes from unleashing the creative energy of American entrepreneurs.

Can you show me where Big Government has imposed on you since Obama was elected? Can you show me how BushCo's Big Government set us all free with its torture, invasion of privacy, warrantless wiretaps, "free speech zones", ad nauseam?

Everything seems to be “unexpected” to this administration: unexpected job losses; unexpected housing numbers; unexpected political losses in Massachusetts, Virginia, and New Jersey. True leaders lead best when confronted with the unexpected. But instead of leading us, the president lectured us. He lectured Wall Street; he lectured Main Street; he lectured Congress; he even lectured our Supreme Court Justices.

The United Corporation of America will put a stop to that.

Oh, and you forgot about NY 23. Don't forget about that, Babs. That was pretty unexpected.

So was 9/11. Oh wait. No it wasn't, and yet our "true leader" sat there for 7 minutes reading My Pet Goat when he was confronted with it.

And don't get me started on Wall Street.

While we're at it, aren't you lecturing us, and President Obama, right now?

He criticized politicians who “wage a perpetual campaign,” but he gave a campaign speech instead of a state of the union address. The campaign is over, and President Obama now has something that candidate Obama never had: an actual track record in office. We now can see the failed policies behind the flowery words. If Americans feel as cynical as the president suggests, perhaps it’s because the audacity of his recycled rhetoric no longer inspires hope.

See: Rock star, Townhall, Florida. They sounded pretty hopeful to me.

Real leadership requires results. Real hope lies in the ingenuity, generosity, and boundless courage of the American people whose voices are still not being heard in Washington.

Maybe you should have titled this piece "Delusional".

H/t: DAKGirl

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Palin's latest Facebook entry: Don't ask

By GottaLaff


UPDATE (H/t: Dr. President), looks like Barbie got her wish.

Original story:

Wowzers, boys and girls, look who's back! That's two days in a row!

My stars and garters, Barbie must be exhausted from ordering Fakey McGhostWriter around:

Women’s Rights groups, like NOW, commendably call out advertisers and networks for airing sexist and demeaning portrayals of women that lead to young women’s diminished self-esteem and acceptance of roles as mere sexed-up objects.

Speaking of mere sexed-up objects...

http://media-files.gather.com/images/d724/d69/d746/d224/d96/f3/full.jpghttp://conservativeamerican.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/palin-butt.bmp

I guess those don't count.
What a ridiculous situation they’re getting themselves into now with their protest of CBS airing a pro-life ad during the upcoming Super Bowl game. The ad will feature Heisman trophy winner Tim Tebow and his mom, and they’ll speak to the sanctity of life and the beautiful potential within every innocent child as Mrs. Tebow acknowledges her choice to give Tim life, despite less than ideal circumstances. Messages like this empower women! This speaks to the strength and commitment and nurturing spirit within women. The message says everything positive and nothing negative about the power of women – and life. Evidently, some women’s rights groups like NOW do not like that message.

Socialist fascist gay commie abortionists are like that.

NOW is looking at the pro-life issue backwards. Women should be reminded that they are strong enough and smart enough to make decisions that allow for career and educational opportunities while still giving their babies a chance at life. In my own home*, my daughter Bristol has also been challenged by pro-abortion “women’s rights” groups who don’t agree with her decision to have her baby, nor do they like the abstinence message which she articulated as her personal commitment.

Well, there was that issue of hypocrisy... Oops, did Barbie McFakeBlogger forget about that?

NOW could gain ground and credibility with everyday Americans, thus allowing their pro-women message to be heard by more than just their ardent supporters, if they made wiser decisions regarding which battles to pick. They should call attention to and embrace the Tebow’s message, instead of covertly and overtly disrespecting what Mrs. Tebow, Bristol, and millions of other women have chosen to do (in less than ideal circumstances).

My message to these groups who are inexplicably offended by a pro-woman, pro-child, pro-life message airing during the Super Bowl: please concentrate on empowering women, help with efforts to prevent unexpected pregnancies, stay consistent with your message that for too long women have been made to feel like sex objects in our “modern” culture and that we can expect better in 2010.

See above photos. Oh, and Fakey McBlogSchmutz? Empowering women includes not allowing men (and women) to make decisions about their own bodies for them.

For someone who's not into government sticking its nose into everyone's bee's wax, you sure do have difficulty processing that.

Empowerment also works better when women have the right to privacy.

Oh, one more thing. Abortion is legal.
But don’t let your double standard glare so vividly as to undo some of the good to which you could contribute.

And CBS: just do the right thing. Don’t cave. Have the backbone to run the ad.

To the Tebows: thank you. America is listening. We appreciate you.

Politicizing is so much a part of Lippy McBarbSchmutz that she even has to extend it to the Super Bowl.

How do you solve a problem like Sarah?

*Before I forget, let me remind you what Levi Johnston said about Barbie McLipSchmutz's fine parenting skills:
The Palin house was much different from what many people expect of a normal family, even before she was nominated for vice president. There wasn’t much parenting in that house. Sarah doesn’t cook, Todd doesn’t cook—the kids would do it all themselves: cook, clean, do the laundry, and get ready for school. Most of the time Bristol would help her youngest sister with her homework, and I’d barbecue chicken or steak on the grill.

Even before Palin became John McCain’s running mate, she seemed worried about what a grandchild would do to her political career. According to Johnston, she had a plan for how to handle her daughter’s unexpected pregnancy.

Sarah told me she had a great idea: we would keep it a secret—nobody would know that Bristol was pregnant. She told me that once Bristol had the baby she and Todd would adopt him. That way, she said, Bristol and I didn’t have to worry about anything. Sarah kept mentioning this plan. She was nagging—she wouldn’t give up. She would say, “So, are you gonna let me adopt him?” We both kept telling her we were definitely not going to let her adopt the baby. I think Sarah wanted to make Bristol look good, and she didn’t want people to know that her 17-year-old daughter was going to have a kid.

After the campaign, Johnston watched Palin turn into a different person. The result back home in Alaska was a woman ready to turn in elected office for money.

I can't wait for the next Ghosty McBlogLips post.

Monday, January 25, 2010

Palin's latest: Mr. President: Please Try, "I'm Listening, People," Instead of "Listen Up, People!"

By GottaLaff

I knew I wasn't done posting for the evening, I just knew it. I felt it in my bones. I had that sneaky little Barbie McLipSchmutz aura haunting my subconscious the way the smell of rancid soup haunts the hallways of old apartment buildings.

I bring you Fakey McGhostWriter:

We’ve now seen three landslide Republican victories in three states that President Obama carried in 2008. From the tea parties to the town halls to the Massachusetts Miracle, Americans have tried to make their opposition to Washington’s big government agenda loud and clear. But the President has decided that this current discontent isn’t his fault, it’s ours. He seems to think we just don’t understand what’s going on because he hasn’t had the chance – in his 411 speeches and 158 interviews last year – to adequately explain his policies to us.
Isn't she presh the way she completely ignored 2001-2008? Isn't that just like her... and the Tea Baggers who think like her?
Instead of sensibly telling the American people, “I’m listening,” the president is saying, “Listen up, people!
Psst! Know why, Fakey? Because between no-nothings like you and the inept media that refuse to do anything but misrepresent/ignore the facts, nobody's listening.
This approach is precisely the reason people are upset with Washington. Americans understand the president’s policies.
No. Not really. Not entirely. Not when he's constantly being drowned out by "Death panels!" and "Grandma's gonna die!" and "Socialist!"
We just don’t agree with them. But the president has refused to shift focus and come around to the center from the far left. Instead he and his old campaign advisers are regrouping to put a new spin on the same old agenda for 2010.

Americans aren’t looking for more political strategists. We’re looking for real leadership that listens and delivers results.
This from the person who eats political strategy for breakfast, lunch, dinner, and between-meal snacks.
The president’s former campaign adviser is now calling on supporters to “get on the same page,” but what’s on that page? He claims that the president is “resolved” to “keep fighting for” his agenda, but we’ve already seen what that government-growth agenda involves, and frankly the hype doesn’t give us much hope. Real health care reform requires a free market approach; real job creation involves incentivizing, not punishing, the job-creators; reining in the “big banks” means ending bailouts; and stopping “the undue influence of lobbyists” means not cutting deals with them behind closed doors.
Real leaders who care about America realize that free market stuff doesn't work. Real leaders who care about America don't lie. Or quit before their term is up. Or toss out bucketful after bucketful of hypocrisy (see: lobbyists, undue influence). Or lie.
Instead of real leadership, though, we’ve had broken promises and backroom deals. One of the worst: candidate Obama promised to go through the federal budget “with a scalpel,” but President Obama spent four times more than his predecessor. Want more? Candidate Obama promised that lobbyists “won’t find a job in my White House,” but President Obama gave at least a dozen former lobbyists top administration jobs.
Want more? Your entire campaign was financed and shaped by lobbyists.
Candidate Obama promised us that we could view his health care deliberations openly and honestly on C-SPAN, but President Obama cut deals behind closed doors with industry lobbyists. Candidate Obama promised us that we would have at least five days to read all major legislation, but President Obama rushed through bills before members of Congress could even read them.
Um, Fakey? The bills were posted on the InterWebs for you to read. Besides, after hashing through every detail for months, thanks to your party's obstructionist tactics, everyone in the universe could have read them at their leisure during all the stalling.

Twice.

Candidate Obama promised us that his economic stimulus package would be targeted and pork-free, but President Obama signed a stimulus bill loaded with pork and goodies for corporate cronies.
Hey! I know! Let's play "Remember When...?" Remember when you had that jet and then you lied about selling it on eBay? Remember the Bridge to Nowhere? Remember all your own corporate cronies who loaded everything with so much pork, they could have replaced Porky Pig as the "Th-th-that's all, folks" mascot? Remember how it takes awhile for a stimulus package to take effect? Remember when you ran for vice president and lost?

I just threw that last one in for fun.
Candidate Obama railed against Wall Street greed, but President Obama cozied up to bankers as he extended and expanded their bailouts. Candidate Obama promised us that for “Every dollar that I’ve proposed [in spending], I’ve proposed an additional cut so that it matches.” We’re still waiting to see how President Obama will cut spending to match the trillion he’s spent.
Yes. Yes, we're still waiting for a lot of things. Know why? Because it's only been one year!
More than anything, Americans were promised jobs, but the president’s stimulus package has failed to stem our rising unemployment rate.
I already covered that.
Maybe it was unfair to expect that an administration with so little private sector experience would understand something about job creation. How many Obama Administration officials have ever had to make a payroll or craft a business plan in the private sector? How many have had to worry about not having the resources to invest and expand? The president’s big government policies have made hiring a new employee a difficult commitment for employers to make. Ask yourself if the Obama Administration has done anything to make it easier for employers to hire. Have they given us any reassurance that the president will keep taxes low and not impose expensive new regulations?
Sounds like a 2012 candidate to me. Your thoughts?
Candidate Obama over-promised; President Obama has under-delivered. We understand you, Mr. President. We’ve listened to you again and again. We ask that you now listen to the American people.
And we ask that you shut your pie hole, genius. Here's why: Because you have failed in every possible way, including ignoring the press, refusing to answer anything but friendly, softball questions, and have yet to listen to the American people when they let you know loudly and clearly that they did not want you anywhere near the White House.

Look who's giving whom advice.

To quote your own blog entry, "Please Try, "I'm Listening, People," Instead of "Listen Up, People!"

Recent Posts