By GottaLaff
David Sirota brings us this one:
Follow the link to read the whole thing.As a candidate, Barack Obama said he would oppose the Panama, South Korea and Colombia Free Trade Agreements. You can verify that (among other places) here. Now, Reuters has the report on a declaration from Tim Geithner (not a shock coming from him, a devout Rubinite):
The Obama administration's endorsement of the Panama pact appears to be a straight-up betrayal of the candidate's campaign promise because the administration says it wants to pass the pact "quickly" and without changes. This is particularly bad not just because it violates a campaign promise, but because its well-known problem of legitimizing and legally securing various tax havens has become an even bigger problem in the new era of huge deficits - that is, in the era where we need to be closing tax havens, not protecting them. [...]U.S. President Barack Obama will work with Congress to move forward on long-stalled free trade agreements with Colombia, Panama and South Korea, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said on Tuesday.
As for the administration's endorsement of the South Korea and Colombia trade agreement, we can't yet call it a betrayal because the White House has left open the possibility of trying to reform those deals before pushing for their passage.