By GottaLaff
However:
The justices unanimously disagreed on that legal point and in a 5-2 vote upheld a provision banning the screens and establishing procedures for paper ballot voting. [...]Now about the rest of the country and those Diebold machines....
“It has a huge precedential value because it confirms the power of the people at the local level to ensure the accuracy of elections,” [Thomas D. Shults, a lawyer for the Sarasota Alliance for Fair Elections] said.
H/t: PoliticalBee