Also, if you're a woman who has had more than one period and are sexually active, I guess McCain would think you are serial killer b/c over 15% of fertilized eggs never implant in the uterus and leave the body through a normal period. Hmmm...
Anon, a miscarriage is not the result of a Democrat killing a baby. It is a natural process that a woman can not control.
Also, my point is that over 15% of all fertilized eggs leave a woman's body naturally with a normal period. Again, that has nothing to do with a Democrat killing a baby. Nope. No baby killing here.
I love how you try to attribute words to my comment that aren't there. I never questioned natural (miscarriages) processes. I only call to attention your willingness to kill an unborn child. That is the "baby killer" portion. But perhaps you didn't graduate high school let alone college. Yet, somehow, you feel qualified to criticize McCain with your drivel. You are so evil that you cannot even see yourselves as others see you - just like Hitler and his ilk.
Anon, remember Andrea Yates? She and her husband went to a strict church and were pro-life. So, she had 5 kids and when she couldn't handle them anymore, she drowned each and everyone of them in the bathtub b/c she said they'd have a better life with God. Another Christian woman in Texas took her two boys outside and beat them to death by bashing their heads in with a big rock b/c she said God told her to send her children home to be with him. She also went to strict fundementalist church.
Those women are fucking baby killers, moron. And I find it strange the way they both did it in the name of God, isn't it?
In this post, McCain's comments are highlighted and then there is a comment about miscarriages. I then made the comment that over 15% of fertilized eggs leave a woman's body naturally through a normal period. So, what are you talking about?
It'd be nice if you would explain what you're talking about rather than insulting my intelligence.
John McCain: My friends, did I tell you that I was a POW in Vietnam and so I know all about torture? This will be useful knowledge to me as we move forward in the war on terror. I know how to torture. I know how to win wars, and I know how to torture. And think about it, my friends, what could be more useful to America right now than another President who is capable of committing human rights violations and torturing those pesky enemy combatants?
The media sings my praises even as I bash them over and over again for their obvious bias toward Senator Obama. I am untouchable, my friends, because I was a POW and that makes my character and judgment unquestionable. No one will ever, ever ask me a difficult question,and if they do, I'll just tell a story about being a POW. Then they'll have another well- deserved pity party for me and back off any further questions...
See how this is going to work, my friends? Cindy was just a pity fuck, at first. But I managed to make her feel badly enough to marry me.
And so it is with the American people. Becoming a Senator was like a pity fuck, and now I have to make enough of them feel badly enough for me so they'll vote me right into the White House. That's the kind of campaign I'm going to run and I'm proud of it. Please show your pity and vote for me in November, my friends.
(I wonder what the first POTUS elected totally out of pity will be like, don't you?)
No exceptions, eh? More reversals of his previously stated positions: Overturn Roe v. Wade, but keep incest & rape exceptions. (Jan 2000) Wants Roe vs. Wade made irrelevant, but would not repeal it. (Aug 1999)
Specifically: McCain said he thought Roe v. Wade should be overturned and said he would support exceptions to a ban on abortion in cases of rape, incest, and when the mother’s life is in danger. Source: Boston Globe, p. A11 Jan 22, 2000 Less than 5 months before that: McCain said, “I’d love to see a point where Roe vs. Wade is irrelevant, and could be repealed because abortion is no longer necessary. But certainly in the short term, or even the long term, I would not support repeal of Roe vs. Wade, which would then force women in America to [undergo] illegal and dangerous operations.” Source: Ron Fournier, Associated Press Aug 24, 1999 http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/John_McCain_Abortion.htm The difference? In Jan 2000, he was running for President.
"SHARE" Buttons for Dummeez: How to "Share" Our Posts with Others
By clicking on theShareicon, you're recommending a post to other readers in the Blogosphere.It's the same as a Digg or Reddit button, but now you can easily share a post with tons of social networking sites all at the same time. That increases our readership. By increasing our readership, you're also increasing the number of comments, broadening healthy discussions, and learning more in the process. So click away! It's an easy way to show your support and invite new people in.
This is a personal web site. It is not a production of any organization. Statements on this site do not represent the views or policies of any organization. Preferences for electoral candidates posted on this site have not been expressed using any organizational resources. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 License. FAIR USE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I have posted it here an effort to advance the understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, and so on. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The material in this site is provided for educational and informational purposes only. I have made effort to include attribution to the source material.
11 comments:
Also, if you're a woman who has had more than one period and are sexually active, I guess McCain would think you are serial killer b/c over 15% of fertilized eggs never implant in the uterus and leave the body through a normal period. Hmmm...
McCain is a damn freak.
You people are evil baby killers and have no tolerance for anyone with any opinion different from your own. Evil Dems!
Yep, Anon, we're the intolerant ones. I guess that's why we called you a "killer" and "evil."
Thanks for stopping by weasel fart.
Anon, a miscarriage is not the result of a Democrat killing a baby. It is a natural process that a woman can not control.
Also, my point is that over 15% of all fertilized eggs leave a woman's body naturally with a normal period. Again, that has nothing to do with a Democrat killing a baby. Nope. No baby killing here.
I love how you try to attribute words to my comment that aren't there. I never questioned natural (miscarriages) processes. I only call to attention your willingness to kill an unborn child. That is the "baby killer" portion. But perhaps you didn't graduate high school let alone college. Yet, somehow, you feel qualified to criticize McCain with your drivel. You are so evil that you cannot even see yourselves as others see you - just like Hitler and his ilk.
Anon, remember Andrea Yates? She and her husband went to a strict church and were pro-life. So, she had 5 kids and when she couldn't handle them anymore, she drowned each and everyone of them in the bathtub b/c she said they'd have a better life with God. Another Christian woman in Texas took her two boys outside and beat them to death by bashing their heads in with a big rock b/c she said God told her to send her children home to be with him. She also went to strict fundementalist church.
Those women are fucking baby killers, moron. And I find it strange the way they both did it in the name of God, isn't it?
In this post, McCain's comments are highlighted and then there is a comment about miscarriages. I then made the comment that over 15% of fertilized eggs leave a woman's body naturally through a normal period. So, what are you talking about?
It'd be nice if you would explain what you're talking about rather than insulting my intelligence.
John McCain: My friends, did I tell you that I was a POW in Vietnam and so I know all about torture? This will be useful knowledge to me as we move forward in the war on terror. I know how to torture. I know how to win wars, and I know how to torture. And think about it, my friends, what could be more useful to America right now than another President who is capable of committing human rights violations and torturing those pesky enemy combatants?
The media sings my praises even as I bash them over and over again for their obvious bias toward Senator Obama. I am untouchable, my friends, because I was a POW and that makes my character and judgment unquestionable. No one will ever, ever ask me a difficult question,and if they do, I'll just tell a story about being a POW. Then they'll have another well- deserved pity party for me and back off any further questions...
See how this is going to work, my friends? Cindy was just a pity fuck, at first. But I managed to make her feel badly enough to marry me.
And so it is with the American people. Becoming a Senator was like a pity fuck, and now I have to make enough of them feel badly enough for me so they'll vote me right into the White House. That's the kind of campaign I'm going to run and I'm proud of it. Please show your pity and vote for me in November, my friends.
(I wonder what the first POTUS elected totally out of pity will be like, don't you?)
No exceptions, eh?
More reversals of his previously stated positions:
Overturn Roe v. Wade, but keep incest & rape exceptions. (Jan 2000)
Wants Roe vs. Wade made irrelevant, but would not repeal it. (Aug 1999)
Specifically:
McCain said he thought Roe v. Wade should be overturned and said he would support exceptions to a ban on abortion in cases of rape, incest, and when the mother’s life is in danger. Source: Boston Globe, p. A11 Jan 22, 2000
Less than 5 months before that:
McCain said, “I’d love to see a point where Roe vs. Wade is irrelevant, and could be repealed because abortion is no longer necessary. But certainly in the short term, or even the long term, I would not support repeal of Roe vs. Wade, which would then force women in America to [undergo] illegal and dangerous operations.”
Source: Ron Fournier, Associated Press Aug 24, 1999
http://www.ontheissues.org/2008/John_McCain_Abortion.htm
The difference? In Jan 2000, he was running for President.
Geez, McCain can't even keep his stories, much less his voting record straight. Why does the media just dismiss all this stuff?
Post a Comment